The argument for integrating vector control with multiple drug administration campaigns to ensure elimination of lymphatic filariasis.

T R Burkot, D N Durrheim, W D Melrose, R Speare, K Ichimori
{"title":"The argument for integrating vector control with multiple drug administration campaigns to ensure elimination of lymphatic filariasis.","authors":"T R Burkot, D N Durrheim, W D Melrose, R Speare, K Ichimori","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-5-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a danger that mass drug administration campaigns may fail to maintain adequate treatment coverage to achieve lymphatic filariasis elimination. Hence, additional measures to suppress transmission might be needed to ensure the success of the Global Program for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Vector control successfully eliminated lymphatic filariasis when implemented alone or with mass drug administration. Challenges to lymphatic filariasis elimination include uncertainty of the exact level and duration of microfilarial suppression required for elimination, the mobility of infected individuals, consistent non-participation of some infected individuals with mass drug administration, the possible development of anti-filarial drug resistance and treatment strategies in areas co-endemic with loasis. Integration of vector control with mass drug administration can address some of these challenges. The potential benefits of vector control would include: (1) the ability to suppress filariasis transmission without the need to identify all individual 'foci of infection'; (2) minimizing the risk of reestablishment of transmission from imported microfilaria positive individuals; and (3) decreasing the risk of dengue or malaria transmission where, respectively, Aedes or Anopheles are lymphatic filariasis vectors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>With adequate sustained treatment coverage, mass drug administration should meet the criteria for elimination of lymphatic filariasis. However, it may be difficult to sustain sufficiently high mass drug administration coverage to achieve lymphatic filariasis elimination in some areas, particularly, where Aedes species are the vectors. Since vector control was effective in controlling and even eliminating lymphatic filariasis transmission, integration of vector control with mass drug administration will ensure the sustainability of transmission suppression and thereby better ensure the success of national filariasis elimination programs. Although trials of some vector control interventions are needed, proven vector control strategies are ready for immediate integration with mass drug administration for many important vectors. Vector control is the only presently available additional lymphatic filariasis control measure with the potential for immediate implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"5 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1560133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-5-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a danger that mass drug administration campaigns may fail to maintain adequate treatment coverage to achieve lymphatic filariasis elimination. Hence, additional measures to suppress transmission might be needed to ensure the success of the Global Program for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis.

Discussion: Vector control successfully eliminated lymphatic filariasis when implemented alone or with mass drug administration. Challenges to lymphatic filariasis elimination include uncertainty of the exact level and duration of microfilarial suppression required for elimination, the mobility of infected individuals, consistent non-participation of some infected individuals with mass drug administration, the possible development of anti-filarial drug resistance and treatment strategies in areas co-endemic with loasis. Integration of vector control with mass drug administration can address some of these challenges. The potential benefits of vector control would include: (1) the ability to suppress filariasis transmission without the need to identify all individual 'foci of infection'; (2) minimizing the risk of reestablishment of transmission from imported microfilaria positive individuals; and (3) decreasing the risk of dengue or malaria transmission where, respectively, Aedes or Anopheles are lymphatic filariasis vectors.

Summary: With adequate sustained treatment coverage, mass drug administration should meet the criteria for elimination of lymphatic filariasis. However, it may be difficult to sustain sufficiently high mass drug administration coverage to achieve lymphatic filariasis elimination in some areas, particularly, where Aedes species are the vectors. Since vector control was effective in controlling and even eliminating lymphatic filariasis transmission, integration of vector control with mass drug administration will ensure the sustainability of transmission suppression and thereby better ensure the success of national filariasis elimination programs. Although trials of some vector control interventions are needed, proven vector control strategies are ready for immediate integration with mass drug administration for many important vectors. Vector control is the only presently available additional lymphatic filariasis control measure with the potential for immediate implementation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将病媒控制与多种给药运动相结合,以确保消灭淋巴丝虫病的论点。
背景:大规模用药运动有可能无法保持足够的治疗覆盖率,从而无法实现根除淋巴丝虫病的目标。因此,可能需要采取其他措施抑制传播,以确保全球消除淋巴丝虫病计划取得成功:讨论:病媒控制在单独实施或与大规模用药一起实施时,可成功消灭淋巴丝虫病。消除淋巴丝虫病所面临的挑战包括:不确定消除淋巴丝虫病所需的微丝抑制的确切程度和持续时间、感染者的流动性、一些感染者始终不参与大规模用药、抗丝虫药物耐药性的可能产生以及在与淋巴丝虫病共同流行地区的治疗策略。将病媒控制与大规模给药相结合可以应对其中的一些挑战。病媒控制的潜在益处包括(1) 能够抑制丝虫病的传播,而无需确定所有个体的 "感染病灶";(2) 尽量减少微丝蚴阳性个体输入后重新传播的风险;(3) 在伊蚊或按蚊分别是淋巴丝虫病病媒的情况下,降低登革热或疟疾传播的风险。然而,在某些地区,特别是伊蚊为病媒的地区,可能很难维持足够高的大规模用药覆盖率,以实现消灭淋巴丝虫病的目标。由于病媒控制能有效控制甚至消除淋巴丝虫病的传播,因此将病媒控制与大规模给药相结合,将确保抑制传播的可持续性,从而更好地确保国家消除丝虫病计划的成功。尽管还需要对一些病媒控制干预措施进行试验,但对于许多重要的病媒来说,经过验证的病媒控制策略已经可以立即与大规模用药相结合。病媒控制是目前唯一有可能立即实施的额外淋巴丝虫病控制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contribution of migrant coffee labourers infected with Onchocerca volvulus to the maintenance of the microfilarial reservoir in an ivermectin-treated area of Mexico. Epidemiology and psycho-social aspects of onchocercal skin diseases in northeastern Nigeria. Contributions of different mosquito species to the transmission of lymphatic filariasis in central Nigeria: implications for monitoring infection by PCR in mosquito pools. The geographical distribution of lymphatic filariasis infection in Malawi. Monitoring lymphatic filariasis interventions: Adult mosquito sampling, and improved PCR - based pool screening method for Wuchereria bancrofti infection in Anopheles mosquitoes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1