Analysis of pregnant occupant crash exposure and the potential effectiveness of four-point seatbelts in far side crashes.

Stefan M Duma, David M Moorcroft, Hampton C Gabler, Sarah M Manoogian, Joel D Stitzel, Greg G Duma
{"title":"Analysis of pregnant occupant crash exposure and the potential effectiveness of four-point seatbelts in far side crashes.","authors":"Stefan M Duma,&nbsp;David M Moorcroft,&nbsp;Hampton C Gabler,&nbsp;Sarah M Manoogian,&nbsp;Joel D Stitzel,&nbsp;Greg G Duma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to present the crash exposure patterns of pregnant occupants and to evaluate the effectiveness of restraint systems, including four-point seatbelts, in far side crashes. The NASS CDS database revealed that 53.0 % of pregnant occupants are exposed to frontal crashes while 13.5 % are exposed to far side impacts. Given that far side crashes were the second leading crash mode after frontal impacts, a previously validated MADYMO computer model of a 30 week pregnant occupant was utilized to investigate pregnant occupant biomechanics in far side crashes. Three impact speeds (5, 15, and 25 mph) were simulated with four restraint conditions: unbelted, lap-belt only, three-point belt, and a four-point belt. Direct abdominal contact from the shoulder strap of the three-point or four-point belt caused uterine-placental strain in contrast to the inertial loading induced strain in the lap-belt and unbelted cases. Overall, the three-point and four-point belt systems provide superior restraint effectiveness for the pregnant occupant compared to the lap-belt and no restraint cases. The four-point resulted in slightly better performance than the three-point belt by reducing the fetal injury risk and occupant excursion.</p>","PeriodicalId":80490,"journal":{"name":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","volume":"50 ","pages":"187-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217485/pdf/aam50_p177.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the crash exposure patterns of pregnant occupants and to evaluate the effectiveness of restraint systems, including four-point seatbelts, in far side crashes. The NASS CDS database revealed that 53.0 % of pregnant occupants are exposed to frontal crashes while 13.5 % are exposed to far side impacts. Given that far side crashes were the second leading crash mode after frontal impacts, a previously validated MADYMO computer model of a 30 week pregnant occupant was utilized to investigate pregnant occupant biomechanics in far side crashes. Three impact speeds (5, 15, and 25 mph) were simulated with four restraint conditions: unbelted, lap-belt only, three-point belt, and a four-point belt. Direct abdominal contact from the shoulder strap of the three-point or four-point belt caused uterine-placental strain in contrast to the inertial loading induced strain in the lap-belt and unbelted cases. Overall, the three-point and four-point belt systems provide superior restraint effectiveness for the pregnant occupant compared to the lap-belt and no restraint cases. The four-point resulted in slightly better performance than the three-point belt by reducing the fetal injury risk and occupant excursion.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕妇乘员碰撞暴露分析及四点式安全带在远侧碰撞中的潜在有效性。
本文的目的是介绍怀孕乘员的碰撞暴露模式,并评估约束系统的有效性,包括四点安全带,在远侧碰撞。NASS CDS数据库显示,53.0%的孕妇会遭遇正面碰撞,13.5%的孕妇会遭遇远侧碰撞。考虑到远侧碰撞是继正面碰撞之后的第二大碰撞模式,研究人员利用先前验证的MADYMO计算机模型,对怀孕30周的乘员进行了远侧碰撞中的生物力学研究。在四种约束条件下模拟了三种冲击速度(5、15和25英里/小时):不系安全带、仅系安全带、三点带和四点带。从三点或四点安全带的肩带直接腹部接触引起子宫-胎盘应变,与惯性载荷引起的应变相比,在腰带和未系安全带的情况下。总的来说,三点和四点安全带系统提供了优越的约束效果,为怀孕乘员相比,安全带和没有约束的情况下。通过降低胎儿损伤风险和乘员偏移,四点安全带的性能略好于三点安全带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Other high-risk factors for young drivers - how graduated licensing does, doesn't or could address them. Characteristics on fractures of tibia and fibula in car impacts to pedestrians and bicyclists - influences of car bumper height and shape. The impacts of functional performance, behaviour and traffic exposure on road-crossing judgements of young children. The association between age, injury, and survival to hospital among a cohort of injured motorcyclists. Are child passengers bringing up the rear? Evidence for differential improvements in injury risk between drivers and their child passengers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1