The debate on surrogate motherhood: the current situation, some arguments and issues; questions facing law and policy.

L M Harding
{"title":"The debate on surrogate motherhood: the current situation, some arguments and issues; questions facing law and policy.","authors":"L M Harding","doi":"10.1080/09649068708412160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent incidents where a woman has intentionally conceived and borne a child by a man for that man and his partner to possess and bring up have attracted a great deal of media excitement and general public concern and debate. The last few years have also seen the publication of the Warnock Committee's Report on “Human Fertilisation and Embryology”1 which discusses surrogate mother practices among other related questions, the passing of an Act outlawing commercial arrangements for surrogacy, and the introduction of a Bill in the Lords outlawing all surrogacy arrangements. At the same time the pace of change in the field of reproductive technology has raised similar challenges to those posed by surrogate motherhood, dilemmas which child-care law and policy need to address. This occurs against a back-drop of intensified debate in the 1970s and 1980s about the general direction of policy and practice in relation to children and their parents or parent substitutes. Recent manifestations of this debate...","PeriodicalId":83137,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of social welfare law","volume":"1987 ","pages":"37-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09649068708412160","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of social welfare law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649068708412160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Recent incidents where a woman has intentionally conceived and borne a child by a man for that man and his partner to possess and bring up have attracted a great deal of media excitement and general public concern and debate. The last few years have also seen the publication of the Warnock Committee's Report on “Human Fertilisation and Embryology”1 which discusses surrogate mother practices among other related questions, the passing of an Act outlawing commercial arrangements for surrogacy, and the introduction of a Bill in the Lords outlawing all surrogacy arrangements. At the same time the pace of change in the field of reproductive technology has raised similar challenges to those posed by surrogate motherhood, dilemmas which child-care law and policy need to address. This occurs against a back-drop of intensified debate in the 1970s and 1980s about the general direction of policy and practice in relation to children and their parents or parent substitutes. Recent manifestations of this debate...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于代孕母亲的争论:现状、争论与问题法律和政策面临的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Supreme Court 1968 Term Feminism and Social Policy The Welfare State: A Self-Inflicted Crisis? Welfare Benefits, Administrative Discretion, and the Politics of the ‘New Urban Left’ The Positive Functions of Poverty 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1