M. Colleen Stainton , Maria Lohan , Judith Fethney , Lyn Woodhart , Shamim Islam
{"title":"Women's responses to two models of antepartum high-risk care: Day stay and hospital stay","authors":"M. Colleen Stainton , Maria Lohan , Judith Fethney , Lyn Woodhart , Shamim Islam","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2006.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To replicate and extend previous research by examining women's responses to two current models of high-risk antenatal care that replaced the traditional bed rest model.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A sample of 61 women assigned to high-risk antenatal care: 29 in the Antenatal Hospital Unit (ANHU) and 32 in the Pregnancy Day Stay Unit (PDSU).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal study with data collected by a range of validated tools were used to assess mood, family functioning, stress and physical symptoms every 2 weeks from admission into antenatal high-risk care to birthing and at 3- and 6-weeks postpartum. Data were analysed for similarities and differences and change over time between the two groups of women.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Stress from emotions was the highest antenatal stressor for both groups and highest for those in hospital. Stress about health increased over time for those in the PDSU and varied for those in ANHU. Anxiety was significantly different between the groups over time (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01), being highest for the ANHU group and decreasing from admission to 6-weeks postnatal for both groups. Sensation Seeking (sensory deprivation) showed significant differences (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <span>0.05) with the highest scores in the ANHU group and increasing over time for both groups. Family relationships were most disrupted for those in ANHU. Both groups were satisfied with support from spouse, family and friends and those in ANHU acknowledged the support received from midwifery staff.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p><span>The responses of both the woman and her family differ between the two models of care and vary with time. Midwives can use the patterns of response identified of these findings to address needs for assistance with family relationships, sensory stimulation, information and support and management of anxiety when care is required for </span>complications of pregnancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages 89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wombi.2006.08.001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519206000667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Aim
To replicate and extend previous research by examining women's responses to two current models of high-risk antenatal care that replaced the traditional bed rest model.
Participants
A sample of 61 women assigned to high-risk antenatal care: 29 in the Antenatal Hospital Unit (ANHU) and 32 in the Pregnancy Day Stay Unit (PDSU).
Methods
A longitudinal study with data collected by a range of validated tools were used to assess mood, family functioning, stress and physical symptoms every 2 weeks from admission into antenatal high-risk care to birthing and at 3- and 6-weeks postpartum. Data were analysed for similarities and differences and change over time between the two groups of women.
Findings
Stress from emotions was the highest antenatal stressor for both groups and highest for those in hospital. Stress about health increased over time for those in the PDSU and varied for those in ANHU. Anxiety was significantly different between the groups over time (p < 0.01), being highest for the ANHU group and decreasing from admission to 6-weeks postnatal for both groups. Sensation Seeking (sensory deprivation) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) with the highest scores in the ANHU group and increasing over time for both groups. Family relationships were most disrupted for those in ANHU. Both groups were satisfied with support from spouse, family and friends and those in ANHU acknowledged the support received from midwifery staff.
Conclusions and implications
The responses of both the woman and her family differ between the two models of care and vary with time. Midwives can use the patterns of response identified of these findings to address needs for assistance with family relationships, sensory stimulation, information and support and management of anxiety when care is required for complications of pregnancy.
期刊介绍:
Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews.
Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.