Women's responses to two models of antepartum high-risk care: Day stay and hospital stay

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Women and Birth Pub Date : 2006-12-01 Epub Date: 2006-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2006.08.001
M. Colleen Stainton , Maria Lohan , Judith Fethney , Lyn Woodhart , Shamim Islam
{"title":"Women's responses to two models of antepartum high-risk care: Day stay and hospital stay","authors":"M. Colleen Stainton ,&nbsp;Maria Lohan ,&nbsp;Judith Fethney ,&nbsp;Lyn Woodhart ,&nbsp;Shamim Islam","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2006.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To replicate and extend previous research by examining women's responses to two current models of high-risk antenatal care that replaced the traditional bed rest model.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A sample of 61 women assigned to high-risk antenatal care: 29 in the Antenatal Hospital Unit (ANHU) and 32 in the Pregnancy Day Stay Unit (PDSU).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal study with data collected by a range of validated tools were used to assess mood, family functioning, stress and physical symptoms every 2 weeks from admission into antenatal high-risk care to birthing and at 3- and 6-weeks postpartum. Data were analysed for similarities and differences and change over time between the two groups of women.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Stress from emotions was the highest antenatal stressor for both groups and highest for those in hospital. Stress about health increased over time for those in the PDSU and varied for those in ANHU. Anxiety was significantly different between the groups over time (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01), being highest for the ANHU group and decreasing from admission to 6-weeks postnatal for both groups. Sensation Seeking (sensory deprivation) showed significant differences (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>0.05) with the highest scores in the ANHU group and increasing over time for both groups. Family relationships were most disrupted for those in ANHU. Both groups were satisfied with support from spouse, family and friends and those in ANHU acknowledged the support received from midwifery staff.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p><span>The responses of both the woman and her family differ between the two models of care and vary with time. Midwives can use the patterns of response identified of these findings to address needs for assistance with family relationships, sensory stimulation, information and support and management of anxiety when care is required for </span>complications of pregnancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages 89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wombi.2006.08.001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519206000667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Aim

To replicate and extend previous research by examining women's responses to two current models of high-risk antenatal care that replaced the traditional bed rest model.

Participants

A sample of 61 women assigned to high-risk antenatal care: 29 in the Antenatal Hospital Unit (ANHU) and 32 in the Pregnancy Day Stay Unit (PDSU).

Methods

A longitudinal study with data collected by a range of validated tools were used to assess mood, family functioning, stress and physical symptoms every 2 weeks from admission into antenatal high-risk care to birthing and at 3- and 6-weeks postpartum. Data were analysed for similarities and differences and change over time between the two groups of women.

Findings

Stress from emotions was the highest antenatal stressor for both groups and highest for those in hospital. Stress about health increased over time for those in the PDSU and varied for those in ANHU. Anxiety was significantly different between the groups over time (p < 0.01), being highest for the ANHU group and decreasing from admission to 6-weeks postnatal for both groups. Sensation Seeking (sensory deprivation) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) with the highest scores in the ANHU group and increasing over time for both groups. Family relationships were most disrupted for those in ANHU. Both groups were satisfied with support from spouse, family and friends and those in ANHU acknowledged the support received from midwifery staff.

Conclusions and implications

The responses of both the woman and her family differ between the two models of care and vary with time. Midwives can use the patterns of response identified of these findings to address needs for assistance with family relationships, sensory stimulation, information and support and management of anxiety when care is required for complications of pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女对两种高危产前护理模式的反应:日间住院和住院
目的通过检查妇女对目前取代传统卧床休息模式的两种高风险产前护理模式的反应,复制和扩展先前的研究。参与者:61名接受高危产前护理的妇女:29名在产前医院病房(ANHU), 32名在妊娠日间住院病房(PDSU)。方法采用一系列经过验证的工具收集的数据进行纵向研究,从产前高危护理入院到分娩,以及产后3周和6周,每2周评估一次情绪、家庭功能、压力和身体症状。研究人员分析了两组女性的异同以及随时间变化的数据。发现情绪压力对两组人来说都是最大的产前压力源,在医院里的压力最大。PDSU组的健康压力随着时间的推移而增加,而ANHU组的健康压力则有所不同。随着时间的推移,两组之间的焦虑程度有显著差异(p <0.01), ANHU组最高,从入院至出生后6周,两组均呈下降趋势。感觉寻求(感觉剥夺)差异有统计学意义(p <0.05), ANHU组得分最高,且随时间的推移,两组得分均升高。安湖县的家庭关系受到的破坏最为严重。两组患者都对来自配偶、家人和朋友的支持感到满意,而在ANHU的患者也承认得到了助产士的支持。结论和意义两种护理模式下,妇女及其家人的反应不同,且随时间而变化。助产士可以利用这些发现确定的反应模式来解决在家庭关系、感官刺激、信息和支持方面的援助需求,以及在需要对妊娠并发症进行护理时对焦虑的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
期刊最新文献
The birth trauma earthquake: A qualitative investigation of first-time mothers who perceived their birth as traumatic The role of midwives in advancing planetary health: Insights from the GREEN MOTHER project in Spain Occupational well-being in community and hospital midwives in the Netherlands: A cross-sectional study Midwives’ competence and challenges in managing urgent childbirth during escalation and closure conditions in the West Bank-Palestine: A qualitative study First Nations families’ maternity care experiences in the Australian Capital Territory: Kapati Time Yarning, intergenerational trauma and the case for Birthing with Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1