Reclassifying DIS-III-R alcohol use disorders to DSM-IV criteria in a sample of convicted impaired drivers.

Janet C'de Baca, Garnett P McMillan, Sandra C Lapham
{"title":"Reclassifying DIS-III-R alcohol use disorders to DSM-IV criteria in a sample of convicted impaired drivers.","authors":"Janet C'de Baca,&nbsp;Garnett P McMillan,&nbsp;Sandra C Lapham","doi":"10.15288/jsa.2006.67.898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study used data gathered from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version Three, Revised (DIS-III-R), which calculated diagnoses based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-III-R), criteria and rescored the data to be compatible with the criteria of the Fourth Edition of the DSM (DSM-IV) for lifetime alcohol abuse and dependence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A psychologist reassigned questions from the DIS-III-R according to DSM-IV criteria. Another clinician evaluated the rescoring criteria and discrepancies were discussed and resolved. Using these criteria, SAS code was written to automate the rescoring of responses to DIS-III-R questions to DSM-IV diagnoses from a population of DWI offenders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a fair-to-good level of agreement between the DSM-III-R and rescored DSM-IV diagnoses (kappa = .65). Three hundred forty-eight subjects classified as alcohol dependent using DSMIII- R were reclassified as alcohol abuse in the DSM-IV rescore. Among subjects who were alcohol dependent based on DIS-III-R criteria, the distribution of DSM-IV diagnoses was similar across gender, age, and ethnic groups. There was no difference in agreement between DSMIII- R and the rescored DSM-IV diagnoses by age category. However, women and Hispanics had significantly higher weighted kappa statistics than men and non-Hispanic whites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our rescoring results were consistent with earlier studies that compared DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses. Here, we offer an approach that may be useful to investigators who used the DIS-III-R in earlier studies. The DIS-III-R questions corresponding to DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence are on our Web site at www.bhrcs.org, along with the scoring algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":17092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.898","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study used data gathered from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version Three, Revised (DIS-III-R), which calculated diagnoses based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-III-R), criteria and rescored the data to be compatible with the criteria of the Fourth Edition of the DSM (DSM-IV) for lifetime alcohol abuse and dependence.

Method: A psychologist reassigned questions from the DIS-III-R according to DSM-IV criteria. Another clinician evaluated the rescoring criteria and discrepancies were discussed and resolved. Using these criteria, SAS code was written to automate the rescoring of responses to DIS-III-R questions to DSM-IV diagnoses from a population of DWI offenders.

Results: There was a fair-to-good level of agreement between the DSM-III-R and rescored DSM-IV diagnoses (kappa = .65). Three hundred forty-eight subjects classified as alcohol dependent using DSMIII- R were reclassified as alcohol abuse in the DSM-IV rescore. Among subjects who were alcohol dependent based on DIS-III-R criteria, the distribution of DSM-IV diagnoses was similar across gender, age, and ethnic groups. There was no difference in agreement between DSMIII- R and the rescored DSM-IV diagnoses by age category. However, women and Hispanics had significantly higher weighted kappa statistics than men and non-Hispanic whites.

Conclusions: Our rescoring results were consistent with earlier studies that compared DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses. Here, we offer an approach that may be useful to investigators who used the DIS-III-R in earlier studies. The DIS-III-R questions corresponding to DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence are on our Web site at www.bhrcs.org, along with the scoring algorithm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在被定罪的受损司机样本中,将DIS-III-R酒精使用障碍重新分类为DSM-IV标准。
目的:本研究使用《诊断访谈表》第三版修订本(DIS-III-R)的数据,根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM- iii - r)的诊断标准计算诊断,并对数据进行重新排序,使其符合第四版DSM (DSM- iv)终身酒精滥用和依赖的标准。方法:一位心理学家根据DSM-IV标准重新分配了DIS-III-R中的问题。另一位临床医生评估了评分标准,讨论并解决了差异。使用这些标准,编写SAS代码来自动记录DWI罪犯对DIS-III-R问题对DSM-IV诊断的反应。结果:DSM-III-R和恢复的DSM-IV诊断之间有相当好的一致性(kappa = .65)。使用dsm - iii - R分类为酒精依赖的348名受试者在DSM-IV评分中被重新分类为酒精滥用。在基于DIS-III-R标准的酒精依赖受试者中,DSM-IV诊断的分布在性别、年龄和种族群体中相似。DSMIII- R和恢复的DSM-IV诊断在年龄分类上的一致性没有差异。然而,女性和西班牙裔白人的加权kappa统计数据明显高于男性和非西班牙裔白人。结论:我们的评分结果与早期比较DSM-III-R和DSM-IV诊断的研究一致。在这里,我们提供了一种可能对在早期研究中使用DIS-III-R的研究人员有用的方法。与DSM-IV酒精滥用和酒精依赖标准相对应的DIS-III-R问题以及评分算法都在我们的网站www.bhrcs.org上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy scale. Premenstrual symptomatology, alcohol consumption, and family history of alcoholism in women with premenstrual syndrome. Alcohol consumption and symptoms of depression in young adults from 20 countries. An evaluation of the performance of the self-rating of the effects of alcohol questionnaire in 12- and 35-year-old subjects. Memory and perseveration on a win-stay, lose-shift task in rats exposed neonatally to alcohol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1