Behind the slow enrollment growth of employer-based consumer-directed health plans.

Jon Gobel, Jeremy Pickreign, Heidi Whitmore
{"title":"Behind the slow enrollment growth of employer-based consumer-directed health plans.","authors":"Jon Gobel,&nbsp;Jeremy Pickreign,&nbsp;Heidi Whitmore","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the buzz about empowering consumers and controlling rising health costs, consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs)--defined as high-deductible plans coupled with savings accounts--have barely gained a toehold among Americans with employer-sponsored insurance, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). CDHP proponents often assert the plans offer employees greater choice and autonomy in the health care marketplace, but 39 percent of the estimated 2.7 million workers enrolled in employer-sponsored CDHPs had no choice of another type of health plan in 2006. Moreover, among workers with a choice of plans, relatively few (19%) choose CDHPs when offered another type of plan option, such as preferred provider organizations (PPOs) or health maintenance organizations (HMO). Comparable take-up rates for PPO and HMO plans when employees have a choice of another plan type were 55 percent and 40 percent, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":80012,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","volume":" 107","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the buzz about empowering consumers and controlling rising health costs, consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs)--defined as high-deductible plans coupled with savings accounts--have barely gained a toehold among Americans with employer-sponsored insurance, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). CDHP proponents often assert the plans offer employees greater choice and autonomy in the health care marketplace, but 39 percent of the estimated 2.7 million workers enrolled in employer-sponsored CDHPs had no choice of another type of health plan in 2006. Moreover, among workers with a choice of plans, relatively few (19%) choose CDHPs when offered another type of plan option, such as preferred provider organizations (PPOs) or health maintenance organizations (HMO). Comparable take-up rates for PPO and HMO plans when employees have a choice of another plan type were 55 percent and 40 percent, respectively.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以雇主为基础的消费者导向的健康计划注册人数增长缓慢的背后。
美国医疗体系改革研究中心(Center for study health System Change,简称HSC)的一项最新全国性研究显示,尽管有关赋予消费者权力和控制不断上涨的医疗成本的说法不绝于声,但消费者导向的医疗计划(CDHPs)——定义为高免赔额计划与储蓄账户相结合——在雇主赞助的美国人中几乎没有获得立足点。CDHP的支持者经常声称,该计划为雇员在医疗保健市场上提供了更多的选择和自主权,但在2006年,参加雇主赞助的CDHP计划的约270万工人中,有39%的人没有其他健康计划的选择。此外,在可选择计划的员工中,当提供其他类型的计划选项(如首选提供者组织(PPOs)或健康维护组织(HMO))时,选择cdhp的员工相对较少(19%)。当员工可以选择另一种计划类型时,PPO和HMO计划的可比接受率分别为55%和40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Small employers and self-insured health benefits: too small to succeed? Employer-sponsored health insurance: down but not out. Rising hospital employment of physicians: better quality, higher costs? Key findings from HSC's 2010 site visits: health care markets weather economic downturn, brace for health reform. Physicians slow to e-mail routinely with patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1