Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in 327 ICSI cycles.

Giovanni B La Sala, Barbara Valli, Sergio Leoni, Michela Pescarini, Ferdinando Martino, Alessia Nicoli
{"title":"Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in 327 ICSI cycles.","authors":"Giovanni B La Sala,&nbsp;Barbara Valli,&nbsp;Sergio Leoni,&nbsp;Michela Pescarini,&nbsp;Ferdinando Martino,&nbsp;Alessia Nicoli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency of testicular sperm recovery by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in an IVF program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective Data Analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Center of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>Couples undergoing TESA/ICSI for obstructive or nonobstructive azoospermia.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>ESA/ICSI.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Efficiency of testicular sperm recovery, fertilization rate, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Between March 1, 1997 and March 31, 2005, 327 cycles of TESA/ICSI were performed in couples in which the male had obstructive or nonobstructive azoospermia. The efficiency of testicular sperm recovery was 99.4% and 99.3%, fertilization rate 57.1% and 49.1%, implantation rate 5.7% and 6.2%, and the clinical pregnancy rate 12.9% and 15.4% in men with obstructive and nonobstructive infertility, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>The efficiency of TESA is very high in both obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. Because TESA is less invasive than TESE, it should be considered a valuable alternative to TESE in IVF programs, especially in setting where resources are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":50324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","volume":"51 4","pages":"177-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility and Womens Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of testicular sperm recovery by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in an IVF program.

Design: Retrospective Data Analysis.

Setting: The Center of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Patient(s): Couples undergoing TESA/ICSI for obstructive or nonobstructive azoospermia.

Intervention(s): ESA/ICSI.

Main outcome measure(s): Efficiency of testicular sperm recovery, fertilization rate, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate.

Result(s): Between March 1, 1997 and March 31, 2005, 327 cycles of TESA/ICSI were performed in couples in which the male had obstructive or nonobstructive azoospermia. The efficiency of testicular sperm recovery was 99.4% and 99.3%, fertilization rate 57.1% and 49.1%, implantation rate 5.7% and 6.2%, and the clinical pregnancy rate 12.9% and 15.4% in men with obstructive and nonobstructive infertility, respectively.

Conclusion(s): The efficiency of TESA is very high in both obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. Because TESA is less invasive than TESE, it should be considered a valuable alternative to TESE in IVF programs, especially in setting where resources are limited.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
327个ICSI周期的睾丸精子抽吸(TESA)。
目的:评价体外受精中睾丸精子抽吸法(TESA)恢复睾丸精子的效果。设计:回顾性数据分析。地点:意大利雷吉欧艾米利亚Arcispedale s . Maria Nuova妇产科生殖医学中心患者:接受TESA/ICSI治疗梗阻性或非梗阻性无精子症的夫妇干预:ESA/ICSI。主要观察指标:睾丸精子恢复效率、受精率、着床率和临床妊娠率。结果:1997年3月1日至2005年3月31日,对男性为梗阻性或非梗阻性无精子症的夫妇进行了327次TESA/ICSI。梗阻性和非梗阻性不孕男性睾丸精子恢复率分别为99.4%和99.3%,受精率分别为57.1%和49.1%,着床率分别为5.7%和6.2%,临床妊娠率分别为12.9%和15.4%。结论:TESA治疗梗阻性和非梗阻性无精子症的效率都很高。由于TESA的侵入性比TESE小,因此在体外受精项目中,尤其是在资源有限的情况下,它应该被认为是TESE的有价值的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The paradox of obstetric "near misses": converting maternal mortality into morbidity. Climacteric symptom control after the addition of low-dose esterified conjugated estrogens to raloxifene standard doses. Update on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: part 2--clinical signs and treatment. Influence of adiposity on leptin, LH and androgen levels in lean, overweight and obese PCOS patients. Value of fetal echocardiography in diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a Serbian university hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1