{"title":"Reining in agency action: the rejected proposal rule and Section 1011 of the 2003 Medicare Act.","authors":"Sabrina Charles","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Section 1011 of the 2003 Medicare Act authorized the disbursement of over one billion dollars to healthcare providers that provide uncompensated emergency medical care to undocumented immigrants. In 2005, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its final interpretation of the statute. Despite previous statementsto the contrary, CMS conditioned eligibilityfor Section 1011 funds on the collection of certain immigration status-related information from patients seeking emergency care. Prior to the issuance of CMS' final guidance, the House defeated House Resolution 3722, which was substantially similar to the CMS final guidance. This Article argues that the House's rejection of H.R. 3722 renders CMS's final guidance invalid under the analysis set forth in Chevron, U.S.A. Inc. v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":80027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health law","volume":"39 3","pages":"403-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Section 1011 of the 2003 Medicare Act authorized the disbursement of over one billion dollars to healthcare providers that provide uncompensated emergency medical care to undocumented immigrants. In 2005, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its final interpretation of the statute. Despite previous statementsto the contrary, CMS conditioned eligibilityfor Section 1011 funds on the collection of certain immigration status-related information from patients seeking emergency care. Prior to the issuance of CMS' final guidance, the House defeated House Resolution 3722, which was substantially similar to the CMS final guidance. This Article argues that the House's rejection of H.R. 3722 renders CMS's final guidance invalid under the analysis set forth in Chevron, U.S.A. Inc. v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc.
2003年《医疗保险法》第1011条授权向向无证移民提供无偿紧急医疗服务的医疗保健提供者支付10亿多美元。2005年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)发布了对该法规的最终解释。尽管之前有相反的声明,但CMS将从寻求紧急护理的患者收集某些与移民身份相关的信息作为获得第1011条资金的条件。在CMS最终指导意见发布之前,众议院否决了与CMS最终指导意见实质相似的众议院3722号决议。本文认为,众议院对H.R. 3722的否决使得CMS的最终指导在Chevron, U.S.A. Inc. v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc.一案中提出的分析无效。