Consumer tolerance for inaccuracy in physician performance ratings: one size fits none.

Matthew M Davis, Judith H Hibbard, Arnold Milstein
{"title":"Consumer tolerance for inaccuracy in physician performance ratings: one size fits none.","authors":"Matthew M Davis,&nbsp;Judith H Hibbard,&nbsp;Arnold Milstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health plans increasingly use physician performance ratings, but some physicians are concerned that measurement inaccuracies may jeopardize their reputations and livelihoods. Absent from the debate thus far are consumer views about how accurate physician ratings need to be for various uses. Consumer tolerance for inaccuracy in physician performance ratings varies widely, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). At least one-third of adults have a low tolerance for inaccuracy (5 percent or less), but more than one of every five adults would tolerate ratings that were 20 percent-50 percent inaccurate. Consumers' relatively higher tolerance for inaccuracy when used for public reporting and tiered networks may speed these uses of physician performance ratings by health plans. However, consumers' lower tolerance for inaccurate ratings when choosing their own physicians and paying physicians for performance may hinder such uses.</p>","PeriodicalId":80012,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","volume":" 110","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health plans increasingly use physician performance ratings, but some physicians are concerned that measurement inaccuracies may jeopardize their reputations and livelihoods. Absent from the debate thus far are consumer views about how accurate physician ratings need to be for various uses. Consumer tolerance for inaccuracy in physician performance ratings varies widely, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). At least one-third of adults have a low tolerance for inaccuracy (5 percent or less), but more than one of every five adults would tolerate ratings that were 20 percent-50 percent inaccurate. Consumers' relatively higher tolerance for inaccuracy when used for public reporting and tiered networks may speed these uses of physician performance ratings by health plans. However, consumers' lower tolerance for inaccurate ratings when choosing their own physicians and paying physicians for performance may hinder such uses.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对医生表现评级不准确的容忍:一刀切。
健康计划越来越多地使用医生绩效评级,但一些医生担心测量不准确可能会危及他们的声誉和生计。到目前为止,消费者对各种用途的医生评级需要有多准确的看法还没有引起争论。根据卫生系统改革研究中心(HSC)的一项新的全国性研究,消费者对医生表现评级不准确的容忍度差异很大。至少有三分之一的成年人对不准确的容忍度很低(5%或更低),但超过五分之一的成年人会容忍20% - 50%的不准确评级。当用于公共报告和分层网络时,消费者对不准确的容忍度相对较高,这可能会加速健康计划对医生绩效评级的使用。然而,消费者在选择自己的医生和根据医生的表现付费时,对不准确评级的容忍度较低,这可能会阻碍这种使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Small employers and self-insured health benefits: too small to succeed? Employer-sponsored health insurance: down but not out. Rising hospital employment of physicians: better quality, higher costs? Key findings from HSC's 2010 site visits: health care markets weather economic downturn, brace for health reform. Physicians slow to e-mail routinely with patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1