Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania.

Arwen Bunce, Greg Guest, Hannah Searing, Veronica Frajzyngier, Peter Riwa, Joseph Kanama, Isaac Achwal
{"title":"Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania.","authors":"Arwen Bunce,&nbsp;Greg Guest,&nbsp;Hannah Searing,&nbsp;Veronica Frajzyngier,&nbsp;Peter Riwa,&nbsp;Joseph Kanama,&nbsp;Isaac Achwal","doi":"10.1363/3301307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Calls for increased inclusion of men in matters of reproductive health emphasize the need for research into vasectomy acceptability and decision making. Vasectomy is a safe, simple and effective method of contraception, but is underused worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted with potential and actual sterilization clients and their partners in the Kigoma Region of Tanzania. Content analysis was used to search for emergent themes related to vasectomy decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes emerged as overarching factors contributing to the vasectomy decision-making process: economics, spousal influence, religion, provider reputation and availability, uncertainty about the future, and poor vasectomy knowledge and understanding. There was substantial communication between partners regarding the vasectomy decision, and wives had a strong influence on the outcome; however, men and women agreed that husbands would resist vasectomy if wives initially raised the topic. Vasectomy acceptance is limited by the scarcity of skilled vasectomy providers and by the fact that men and women hold many of the same misunderstandings about vasectomy, including a fear of decreased sexual performance as a result of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spousal discussions are important in the decision to get a vasectomy, but these discussions should be initiated by the male partner. Programs need to educate men about contraceptive options, including vasectomies. Detailed, culturally relevant knowledge of the barriers and facilitators individuals experience during their decision- making process will enable vasectomy promotion programs to more successfully target appropriate populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":81537,"journal":{"name":"International family planning perspectives","volume":"33 1","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/3301307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Context: Calls for increased inclusion of men in matters of reproductive health emphasize the need for research into vasectomy acceptability and decision making. Vasectomy is a safe, simple and effective method of contraception, but is underused worldwide.

Methods: Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted with potential and actual sterilization clients and their partners in the Kigoma Region of Tanzania. Content analysis was used to search for emergent themes related to vasectomy decision making.

Results: Six themes emerged as overarching factors contributing to the vasectomy decision-making process: economics, spousal influence, religion, provider reputation and availability, uncertainty about the future, and poor vasectomy knowledge and understanding. There was substantial communication between partners regarding the vasectomy decision, and wives had a strong influence on the outcome; however, men and women agreed that husbands would resist vasectomy if wives initially raised the topic. Vasectomy acceptance is limited by the scarcity of skilled vasectomy providers and by the fact that men and women hold many of the same misunderstandings about vasectomy, including a fear of decreased sexual performance as a result of the procedure.

Conclusions: Spousal discussions are important in the decision to get a vasectomy, but these discussions should be initiated by the male partner. Programs need to educate men about contraceptive options, including vasectomies. Detailed, culturally relevant knowledge of the barriers and facilitators individuals experience during their decision- making process will enable vasectomy promotion programs to more successfully target appropriate populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响坦桑尼亚输精管结扎可接受性的因素。
背景:呼吁男性更多地参与生殖健康事务,强调需要研究输精管结扎术的可接受性和决策。输精管结扎术是一种安全、简单、有效的避孕方法,但在世界范围内使用不足。方法:对坦桑尼亚基戈马地区潜在和实际绝育患者及其伴侣进行焦点小组讨论和深度访谈。内容分析用于搜索与输精管结扎决策相关的紧急主题。结果:六个主题成为影响输精管结扎决策过程的首要因素:经济、配偶影响、宗教、提供者声誉和可用性、对未来的不确定性以及输精管结扎知识和理解的不足。伴侣之间就输精管结扎的决定进行了大量的沟通,妻子对结果有很大的影响;然而,男性和女性一致认为,如果妻子首先提出这个话题,丈夫会抵制输精管结扎术。由于缺乏熟练的输精管结扎提供者,以及男性和女性对输精管结扎术有许多相同的误解,包括担心手术会导致性能力下降,因此输精管结扎术的接受程度受到限制。结论:配偶讨论在决定是否进行输精管结扎时很重要,但这些讨论应由男性伴侣发起。项目需要教育男性避孕选择,包括输精管切除术。对个体在决策过程中遇到的障碍和促进因素进行详细的、与文化相关的了解,将使输精管结扎推广计划能够更成功地针对合适的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Danlou Tablet May Alleviate Vascular Injury Caused by Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia through Regulating FIH-1, HIF-1, and Angptl4. An Update to the Pilot Study of 177Lu-PSMA in Low Volume Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Psychometric properties of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (KKaPsy). The role of social support and parity on contraceptive use in Cambodia Early coital debut and associated HIV risk factors among young women and men in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1