Reliability, validity, incidence and impact of temporormandibular pain disorders in adolescents.

Swedish dental journal. Supplement Pub Date : 2007-01-01
Ing-Marie Nilsson
{"title":"Reliability, validity, incidence and impact of temporormandibular pain disorders in adolescents.","authors":"Ing-Marie Nilsson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first aim of this thesis was to investigate the prevalence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain in adolescents an a Swedish county and whether there were differences in patient age and gender and in treatment given for TMD pain by dentists in Public Dental Service (PDS) clinics. The epidemiological variable TMD-S was introduced in the PDS in Ostergötland County, Sweden, in 2000 and is recorded for all adolescents aged 12-19 at the annual routine examination. Self-reported TMD pain in this investigation was based upon the response of the subjects to two questions: (1) Do you have pain in your temples, face, temporomandibular joint, or jaws once a week or more? and (2) Do you have pain when you open your mouth wide or chew, once a week or more? Dental records of 200 patients with TMD pain were randomly selected from the population to evaluate treatment given for TMD. Among 28,899 participating adolescents, 4.2% reported TMD pain. Prevalence increased with age, a significant difference was seen between boys and girls, and 34% of patients with TMD pain received TMD-relared treatment in dental clinics. The second aim was to evaluate the reliability and validity of self-reported TMD pain in 120 adolescents, 60 with self-reported TMD pain and 60 age- and sex-matched controls without TMD pain. All adolescents were examined twice at a PDS clinic. At the first examination, self-reported TMD pain was recorded for each patient. At the second examination, a clinical examination was made blind to the patients' self-report of pain symptoms, after which self-reported TMD pain was again recorded. The clinical examination was based upon the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD). Test-retest reliability of 0.83 (kappa) was found for the two questions. Sensitivity was 0.98 and specificity 0.90 for assessments made on the same day and 0.96 and 0.83, respectively, for assessments made 2-4 weeks apart. The third aim was to evaluate incidence, by age and gender, and temporal patterns of TMD pain in adolescents. This 3-year longitudinal study was carried out at all PDS clinics from 2000 to 2003. All individuals aged 12-19 years in the county who visited the clinics for annual examinations were eligible for the study. Overall, the annual incidence of TMD pain among 2255 participating adolescents was 2.9%. Incidence among girls (4.5% was significantly higher than in boys (1.3%). Incidence increased with age in girls and boys, although less so in boys. These adolescents were re-examined annually for 3 years, and a fluctuating pattern of TMD pain was common. The fourth and final aim was to investigate gender and age differences in pain behavior, jaw function, and psychosocial status in adolescents with self-reported TMD pain. A postal questionnaire was sent to 350 consecutive patients with self-reported TMD pain and 350 healthy age- and sex-matched individuals aged 12-19 years 2-4 weeks after their annual dental examination. The groups were divided into younger (age 12-15) and older (age 16-19) groups. The TMD and control groups differed significantly in most variables related to pain characteristics and psychosocial and behavioral factors. Multiple pain sites were significantly more common in the TMD than in the control group, but there were no gender differences. For adolescents reporting pain once a week or more, no gender differences were seen in pain intensities. Jaw function limitation, depression scores, and perceived need for TMD treatment were significantly higher overall in girls than in boys. Almost one-third of older girls, compared to one out of ten older boys, reported school absences and analgesic consumption because of their TMD pain. Older girls had significantly higher Graded Chronic Pain Scale scores than older boys. In conclusion, TMD pain increases with increasing age in adolescents and is more common in girls than in boys. A fluctuating pain pattern can be seen. TMD-S, with two self-report questions, has very good reliability and validity, and can be recommended for screening adolescents for TMD pain. TMD pain seems to have a greater Impact on girls than boys. particularly in ages 16-19 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":76572,"journal":{"name":"Swedish dental journal. Supplement","volume":" 183","pages":"7-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish dental journal. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first aim of this thesis was to investigate the prevalence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain in adolescents an a Swedish county and whether there were differences in patient age and gender and in treatment given for TMD pain by dentists in Public Dental Service (PDS) clinics. The epidemiological variable TMD-S was introduced in the PDS in Ostergötland County, Sweden, in 2000 and is recorded for all adolescents aged 12-19 at the annual routine examination. Self-reported TMD pain in this investigation was based upon the response of the subjects to two questions: (1) Do you have pain in your temples, face, temporomandibular joint, or jaws once a week or more? and (2) Do you have pain when you open your mouth wide or chew, once a week or more? Dental records of 200 patients with TMD pain were randomly selected from the population to evaluate treatment given for TMD. Among 28,899 participating adolescents, 4.2% reported TMD pain. Prevalence increased with age, a significant difference was seen between boys and girls, and 34% of patients with TMD pain received TMD-relared treatment in dental clinics. The second aim was to evaluate the reliability and validity of self-reported TMD pain in 120 adolescents, 60 with self-reported TMD pain and 60 age- and sex-matched controls without TMD pain. All adolescents were examined twice at a PDS clinic. At the first examination, self-reported TMD pain was recorded for each patient. At the second examination, a clinical examination was made blind to the patients' self-report of pain symptoms, after which self-reported TMD pain was again recorded. The clinical examination was based upon the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD). Test-retest reliability of 0.83 (kappa) was found for the two questions. Sensitivity was 0.98 and specificity 0.90 for assessments made on the same day and 0.96 and 0.83, respectively, for assessments made 2-4 weeks apart. The third aim was to evaluate incidence, by age and gender, and temporal patterns of TMD pain in adolescents. This 3-year longitudinal study was carried out at all PDS clinics from 2000 to 2003. All individuals aged 12-19 years in the county who visited the clinics for annual examinations were eligible for the study. Overall, the annual incidence of TMD pain among 2255 participating adolescents was 2.9%. Incidence among girls (4.5% was significantly higher than in boys (1.3%). Incidence increased with age in girls and boys, although less so in boys. These adolescents were re-examined annually for 3 years, and a fluctuating pattern of TMD pain was common. The fourth and final aim was to investigate gender and age differences in pain behavior, jaw function, and psychosocial status in adolescents with self-reported TMD pain. A postal questionnaire was sent to 350 consecutive patients with self-reported TMD pain and 350 healthy age- and sex-matched individuals aged 12-19 years 2-4 weeks after their annual dental examination. The groups were divided into younger (age 12-15) and older (age 16-19) groups. The TMD and control groups differed significantly in most variables related to pain characteristics and psychosocial and behavioral factors. Multiple pain sites were significantly more common in the TMD than in the control group, but there were no gender differences. For adolescents reporting pain once a week or more, no gender differences were seen in pain intensities. Jaw function limitation, depression scores, and perceived need for TMD treatment were significantly higher overall in girls than in boys. Almost one-third of older girls, compared to one out of ten older boys, reported school absences and analgesic consumption because of their TMD pain. Older girls had significantly higher Graded Chronic Pain Scale scores than older boys. In conclusion, TMD pain increases with increasing age in adolescents and is more common in girls than in boys. A fluctuating pain pattern can be seen. TMD-S, with two self-report questions, has very good reliability and validity, and can be recommended for screening adolescents for TMD pain. TMD pain seems to have a greater Impact on girls than boys. particularly in ages 16-19 years.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年颞下颌疼痛障碍的信度、效度、发生率和影响。
本文的第一个目的是调查瑞典一个县青少年颞下颌紊乱(TMD)疼痛的患病率,以及患者的年龄、性别和公共牙科服务(PDS)诊所牙医对TMD疼痛的治疗是否存在差异。流行病学变量TMD-S于2000年在瑞典Ostergötland县的PDS中引入,并在年度常规检查中记录所有12-19岁青少年。在本次调查中,自我报告的TMD疼痛是基于受试者对两个问题的回答:(1)你是否每周一次或更多地感到太阳穴、面部、颞下颌关节或颌骨疼痛?(2)当你张大嘴巴或咀嚼时是否感到疼痛,一周一次或更多次?从人群中随机选择200例TMD疼痛患者的牙科记录来评估TMD的治疗方法。在28,899名参与调查的青少年中,4.2%报告了TMD疼痛。患病率随着年龄的增长而增加,男孩和女孩之间存在显著差异,34%的TMD疼痛患者在牙科诊所接受了TMD相关治疗。第二个目的是评估120名青少年自我报告的TMD疼痛的可靠性和有效性,60名自我报告的TMD疼痛和60名年龄和性别匹配的无TMD疼痛对照。所有青少年都在PDS诊所接受了两次检查。在第一次检查时,记录每位患者自我报告的TMD疼痛。在第二次检查时,对患者自述的疼痛症状进行盲检,之后再次记录患者自述的TMD疼痛。临床检查依据TMD研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)。两个问题的重测信度为0.83 (kappa)。当天评估的敏感性为0.98,特异性为0.90,间隔2-4周评估的敏感性为0.96,特异性为0.83。第三个目的是评估青少年TMD疼痛的发病率、年龄和性别以及时间模式。这项为期3年的纵向研究于2000年至2003年在所有PDS诊所进行。该县所有到诊所进行年度检查的12-19岁的个人都有资格参加这项研究。总体而言,在2255名参与研究的青少年中,TMD疼痛的年发病率为2.9%。女孩的发病率(4.5%)显著高于男孩(1.3%)。女孩和男孩的发病率随着年龄的增长而增加,但男孩的发病率较低。这些青少年每年重新检查3年,TMD疼痛的波动模式是常见的。第四个也是最后一个目的是调查自我报告TMD疼痛的青少年在疼痛行为、颌功能和社会心理状态方面的性别和年龄差异。在每年的牙齿检查后2-4周,向350名自我报告TMD疼痛的连续患者和350名年龄和性别匹配的健康12-19岁的个体发送邮寄调查问卷。这些人群被分为较年轻(12-15岁)和较年长(16-19岁)两组。TMD组和对照组在大多数与疼痛特征、社会心理和行为因素相关的变量上存在显著差异。多发性疼痛部位在TMD组明显比对照组更常见,但没有性别差异。对于每周报告疼痛一次或更多次的青少年,疼痛强度没有性别差异。下颌功能限制、抑郁评分和对TMD治疗的感知需求在女孩中总体上显著高于男孩。与十分之一的大男孩相比,几乎三分之一的大女孩报告说,由于他们的TMD疼痛而缺课和服用止痛药。年龄较大的女孩的慢性疼痛评分明显高于年龄较大的男孩。总之,TMD疼痛随着青少年年龄的增长而增加,女孩比男孩更常见。可以看到波动的疼痛模式。TMD- s包含两个自我报告问题,具有很好的信度和效度,可推荐用于青少年TMD疼痛的筛查。TMD疼痛对女孩的影响似乎比男孩更大。尤其是16-19岁的孩子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental tooth clenching. A model for studying mechanisms of muscle pain. On implementation of an endodontic program. Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and orthodontic treatment. Effects on dental, skeletal and nasal structures and rhinological findings. Masticatory function and temporomandibular disorders in patients with dentofacial deformities. On dental caries and dental erosion in Swedish young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1