Releasing managed care's chokehold on healthcare providers.

Annals of health law Pub Date : 2007-01-01
Kristin L Jensen
{"title":"Releasing managed care's chokehold on healthcare providers.","authors":"Kristin L Jensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article addresses the imbalance of power between managed care organizations and physicians regarding the content of treatment information given to patients. The author provides a thoughtful discussion surrounding informed consent issues in a managed care environment, and how managed care organizations maintain their control over physicians. The author concludes by offering varied and insightful methods to even out the disparity of power.</p>","PeriodicalId":79788,"journal":{"name":"Annals of health law","volume":"16 1","pages":"141-61, table of contents"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of health law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the imbalance of power between managed care organizations and physicians regarding the content of treatment information given to patients. The author provides a thoughtful discussion surrounding informed consent issues in a managed care environment, and how managed care organizations maintain their control over physicians. The author concludes by offering varied and insightful methods to even out the disparity of power.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解除管理式医疗对医疗保健提供者的束缚。
本文讨论了管理护理组织和医生之间关于给予患者治疗信息内容的权力不平衡。作者提供了一个深思熟虑的讨论,围绕知情同意问题在一个管理的护理环境,以及如何管理的护理组织保持对医生的控制。最后,作者提出了各种有见地的方法来平衡权力的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial conflicts of interest in science. Beyond "safe and effective": the role of the federal government in supporting and disseminating comparative-effectiveness research. Putting together the pieces: recent proposals to fill in the genetic testing regulatory puzzle. Options for state and local governments to regulate non-cigarette tobacco products. Prescription data mining, medical privacy and the First Amendment: the U.S. Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS health Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1