Margaret M McGovern, Rob Elles, Isabella Beretta, Martin J Somerville, Gerald Hoefler, Mauri Keinanen, David Barton, Nancy Carson, Elisabeth Dequeker, Radim Brdicka, Alena Blazkova, Ségolène Aymé, Birgit Schnieders, Clemens R Muller, Vibeke Dalen, Armando Albert Martinez, Ulf Kristoffersson, Meral Ozguc, Hansjakob Mueller, Joe Boone, Ira M Lubin, Jorge Sequeiros, Domenica Taruscio, Bob Williamson, Lynn Mainland, Hiroshi Yoshikura, Elettra Ronchi
{"title":"Report of an international survey of molecular genetic testing laboratories.","authors":"Margaret M McGovern, Rob Elles, Isabella Beretta, Martin J Somerville, Gerald Hoefler, Mauri Keinanen, David Barton, Nancy Carson, Elisabeth Dequeker, Radim Brdicka, Alena Blazkova, Ségolène Aymé, Birgit Schnieders, Clemens R Muller, Vibeke Dalen, Armando Albert Martinez, Ulf Kristoffersson, Meral Ozguc, Hansjakob Mueller, Joe Boone, Ira M Lubin, Jorge Sequeiros, Domenica Taruscio, Bob Williamson, Lynn Mainland, Hiroshi Yoshikura, Elettra Ronchi","doi":"10.1159/000101753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To collect data on the practices of molecular genetic testing (MGT) laboratories for the development of national and international policies for quality assurance (QA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey of MGT laboratory directors (n = 827; response rate 63%) in 18 countries on 3 continents. QA and reporting indices were developed and calculated for each responding laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laboratory setting varied among and within countries, as did qualifications of the directors. Respondents in every country indicated that their laboratory receives specimens from outside their national borders (64%, n = 529). Pair-wise comparisons of the QA index revealed a significant association with the director having formal training in molecular genetics (p < 0.005), affiliation with a genetics unit (p = 0.003), accreditation of the laboratory (p < 0.005) and participation in proficiency testing (p < 0.005). Research labs had a lower mean report score compared to all other settings (p < 0.05) as did laboratories accessioning <150 samples per year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MGT is provided under widely varying conditions and regulatory frameworks. The data provided here may be a useful guide for policy action at both governmental and professional levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"10 3","pages":"123-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000101753","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000101753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
Abstract
Objective: To collect data on the practices of molecular genetic testing (MGT) laboratories for the development of national and international policies for quality assurance (QA).
Methods: A web-based survey of MGT laboratory directors (n = 827; response rate 63%) in 18 countries on 3 continents. QA and reporting indices were developed and calculated for each responding laboratory.
Results: Laboratory setting varied among and within countries, as did qualifications of the directors. Respondents in every country indicated that their laboratory receives specimens from outside their national borders (64%, n = 529). Pair-wise comparisons of the QA index revealed a significant association with the director having formal training in molecular genetics (p < 0.005), affiliation with a genetics unit (p = 0.003), accreditation of the laboratory (p < 0.005) and participation in proficiency testing (p < 0.005). Research labs had a lower mean report score compared to all other settings (p < 0.05) as did laboratories accessioning <150 samples per year.
Conclusion: MGT is provided under widely varying conditions and regulatory frameworks. The data provided here may be a useful guide for policy action at both governmental and professional levels.