Obstacles and advances in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Joseph O Deasy, James R Alaly, Konstantin Zakaryan
{"title":"Obstacles and advances in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.","authors":"Joseph O Deasy,&nbsp;James R Alaly,&nbsp;Konstantin Zakaryan","doi":"10.1159/000106027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, the current state of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning systems is reviewed, including some inefficiencies along with useful workarounds and potential advances. Common obstacles in IMRT treatment planning are discussed, including problems due to the lack of scatter tails in optimization dose calculations, unexpected hot spots appearing in uncontoured regions, and uncontrolled tradeoffs inherent in conventional systems. Workarounds that can be applied in current systems are reviewed, including the incorporation of an 'anchor zone' around the target volume (including a margin of separation), which typically induces adequate dose falloff around the target, and the use of pseudostructures to reduce conflicts among objective functions. We propose changing the planning problem statement so that different dosimetric or outcome goals are prioritized as part of the prescription ('prioritized prescription optimization'). Higher-priority goals are turned into constraints for iterations that consider lower-priority goals. This would control tradeoffs between dosimetric objectives. A plan review tool is proposed that specifically summarizes distances from a structure to hot or cold doses ('dose-distance plots'). An algorithm for including scatter in the optimization process is also discussed. Lastly, brief comments are made about the ongoing effort to use outcome models to rank or optimize treatment plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":55140,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","volume":"40 ","pages":"42-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000106027","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000106027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In this paper, the current state of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning systems is reviewed, including some inefficiencies along with useful workarounds and potential advances. Common obstacles in IMRT treatment planning are discussed, including problems due to the lack of scatter tails in optimization dose calculations, unexpected hot spots appearing in uncontoured regions, and uncontrolled tradeoffs inherent in conventional systems. Workarounds that can be applied in current systems are reviewed, including the incorporation of an 'anchor zone' around the target volume (including a margin of separation), which typically induces adequate dose falloff around the target, and the use of pseudostructures to reduce conflicts among objective functions. We propose changing the planning problem statement so that different dosimetric or outcome goals are prioritized as part of the prescription ('prioritized prescription optimization'). Higher-priority goals are turned into constraints for iterations that consider lower-priority goals. This would control tradeoffs between dosimetric objectives. A plan review tool is proposed that specifically summarizes distances from a structure to hot or cold doses ('dose-distance plots'). An algorithm for including scatter in the optimization process is also discussed. Lastly, brief comments are made about the ongoing effort to use outcome models to rank or optimize treatment plans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调强放射治疗计划的障碍与进展。
本文综述了调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗计划系统的现状,包括一些效率低下的问题,以及有用的解决方法和潜在的进展。讨论了IMRT治疗计划中的常见障碍,包括在优化剂量计算中缺乏散射尾,在非轮廓区域出现意外热点以及传统系统固有的不受控制的权衡。本文回顾了可应用于当前系统的变通方法,包括在目标体积周围加入“锚区”(包括分离边缘),这通常会在目标周围引起足够的剂量衰减,并使用伪结构来减少目标函数之间的冲突。我们建议更改规划问题陈述,以便不同的剂量学或结果目标作为处方的一部分被优先考虑(“优先处方优化”)。高优先级目标被转换为考虑低优先级目标的迭代的约束。这将控制剂量学目标之间的权衡。提出了一种计划审查工具,专门总结从结构到热剂量或冷剂量的距离(“剂量-距离图”)。本文还讨论了在优化过程中考虑散射的算法。最后,简要评论了正在进行的使用结果模型对治疗方案进行排序或优化的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in the planning and delivery of radiotherapy: new expectations, new standards of care. The expanding roles of stereotactic body radiation therapy and oligofractionation: toward a new practice of radiotherapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: normal tissue and tumor control effects with large dose per fraction. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for thoracic cancers: recommendations for patient selection, setup and therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for gastrointestinal malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1