Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry Pub Date : 2007-11-01 Epub Date: 2007-08-02 DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00227.x
Morakot Piemjai, Mansuang Arksornnukit
{"title":"Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems.","authors":"Morakot Piemjai,&nbsp;Mansuang Arksornnukit","doi":"10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00227.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To measure the compressive strength of porcelain laminates of 0.5 or 1.0 mm thickness when bonded to enamel or dentin using these resin cements: All-Bond 2 + Choice, Panavia 21, Scotchbond + Opal, and Super-Bond C&B.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The buccal and lingual aspects of human molars were sectioned to prepare specimens at least 3 x 3 x 3 mm in size. Thirty horizontally flat enamel surfaces were prepared with a diamond disc for each group using a milling machine. Ten enamel specimens were randomly selected to test the fracture strength of 0.5-mm thick porcelain laminates without resin cement, and the data were recorded for a control group. The enamel specimens of each group were divided into two subgroups of 15 specimens to bond with either 0.5- or 1.0-mm thick porcelain laminates. Four resin cements were used for bonding of individual groups. All bonded specimens were stored in 37 degrees C for 24 hours before fracture testing. The horizontally flat dentin surfaces were prepared on the fractured bonded specimens using a diamond disc for each group. Ten 0.5 mm porcelain laminates were randomly selected to test the fracture strength on dentin (control group). The bonded laminates to dentin were prepared using the same procedure as for enamel. The fracture strengths were statistically analyzed at alpha= 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences in mean fracture strengths between groups were revealed. No significant difference in fracture strengths of control specimens between enamel and dentin was found. Super-Bond C&B provided a higher fracture resistance of porcelain than the other resin cements. Increasing the thickness of porcelain laminate increased the fracture strength. The 0.5-mm thick porcelain bonded to enamel had higher fracture strength than that of 1.0-mm thick porcelain bonded to dentin when using Super-Bond C&B and Scotchbond + Opal cements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bonding techniques and curing systems of resin cements influenced the fracture resistance of porcelain laminates. Dry bonding with auto-polymerization of Super-Bond C&B resin provided the highest fracture resistance of porcelain. Porcelain bonded to enamel with this resin had a much higher fracture strength than when bonded to dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":"16 6","pages":"457-64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00227.x","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00227.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2007/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the compressive strength of porcelain laminates of 0.5 or 1.0 mm thickness when bonded to enamel or dentin using these resin cements: All-Bond 2 + Choice, Panavia 21, Scotchbond + Opal, and Super-Bond C&B.

Materials and methods: The buccal and lingual aspects of human molars were sectioned to prepare specimens at least 3 x 3 x 3 mm in size. Thirty horizontally flat enamel surfaces were prepared with a diamond disc for each group using a milling machine. Ten enamel specimens were randomly selected to test the fracture strength of 0.5-mm thick porcelain laminates without resin cement, and the data were recorded for a control group. The enamel specimens of each group were divided into two subgroups of 15 specimens to bond with either 0.5- or 1.0-mm thick porcelain laminates. Four resin cements were used for bonding of individual groups. All bonded specimens were stored in 37 degrees C for 24 hours before fracture testing. The horizontally flat dentin surfaces were prepared on the fractured bonded specimens using a diamond disc for each group. Ten 0.5 mm porcelain laminates were randomly selected to test the fracture strength on dentin (control group). The bonded laminates to dentin were prepared using the same procedure as for enamel. The fracture strengths were statistically analyzed at alpha= 0.05.

Results: Statistically significant differences in mean fracture strengths between groups were revealed. No significant difference in fracture strengths of control specimens between enamel and dentin was found. Super-Bond C&B provided a higher fracture resistance of porcelain than the other resin cements. Increasing the thickness of porcelain laminate increased the fracture strength. The 0.5-mm thick porcelain bonded to enamel had higher fracture strength than that of 1.0-mm thick porcelain bonded to dentin when using Super-Bond C&B and Scotchbond + Opal cements.

Conclusions: Bonding techniques and curing systems of resin cements influenced the fracture resistance of porcelain laminates. Dry bonding with auto-polymerization of Super-Bond C&B resin provided the highest fracture resistance of porcelain. Porcelain bonded to enamel with this resin had a much higher fracture strength than when bonded to dentin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用四种胶粘剂体系粘结搪瓷或牙本质的瓷层板抗压断裂性能。
目的:测量0.5或1.0 mm厚的瓷层板在使用以下树脂胶合剂(All-Bond 2 + Choice, Panavia 21, Scotchbond + Opal, Super-Bond C&B)粘合到牙釉质或牙本质时的抗压强度。材料和方法:对人磨牙的颊部和舌部进行切片,制备尺寸至少为3 × 3 × 3 mm的标本。用铣床为每组准备30个水平平面的珐琅表面,并使用金刚石盘。随机选取10个搪瓷试件,测试0.5 mm厚无树脂水泥瓷层合板的断裂强度,并记录数据作为对照组。每组牙釉质标本分成两个亚组,每组15个标本,分别与0.5或1.0 mm厚的瓷层板结合。用四种树脂胶结剂粘接各基团。所有粘结试样在37℃下保存24小时后进行断裂试验。每组用金刚石盘在断裂粘结试样上制备水平平面牙本质表面。随机选择10块0.5 mm瓷层压板,测试其对牙本质的断裂强度(对照组)。与牙本质结合的层压板采用与牙釉质相同的方法制备。断裂强度以alpha= 0.05进行统计学分析。结果:组间平均断裂强度差异有统计学意义。对照组牙本质与牙釉质的断裂强度无明显差异。超粘接C&B比其他树脂胶合剂具有更高的瓷体抗断裂性能。增加瓷层板的厚度可以提高瓷层板的断裂强度。使用Super-Bond C&B和Scotchbond + Opal粘结剂时,0.5 mm厚瓷与牙本质的粘结强度高于1.0 mm厚瓷与牙本质的粘结强度。结论:树脂胶结剂的粘结技术和固化体系影响瓷层板的抗断裂性能。采用自聚合的超粘接C&B树脂进行干粘接,使陶瓷具有最高的抗断裂性能。用这种树脂粘在牙釉质上的瓷比粘在牙本质上的瓷具有更高的断裂强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
期刊最新文献
Retrieving a "frozen" over-torqued altered dental implant healing abutment: A dental technique. Effects of autoclave sterilization on the dimensional stability of implant surgical guides: A 3D in vitro analysis. What occlusal scheme should be used for tooth-supported fixed partial dentures? Relationship between palatal coverage and accuracy of texture perception: A preliminary study using an experimental palatal plate. Obtaining full-arch implant scan with smartphone video and deep learning: An in vitro investigation on trueness and precision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1