Obtrusiveness of information-based assistive technologies as perceived by older adults in residential care facilities: a secondary analysis.

Karen L Courtney, George Demiris, Brian K Hensel
{"title":"Obtrusiveness of information-based assistive technologies as perceived by older adults in residential care facilities: a secondary analysis.","authors":"Karen L Courtney,&nbsp;George Demiris,&nbsp;Brian K Hensel","doi":"10.1080/14639230701447735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the anticipated growth in the older adult population in the next few years, information designers are examining new ways for assistive technologies to support independent living and quality of life for adults as they age. Central to the role of assistive technology to support and enhance quality of life is the development of non-obtrusive technologies. Despite the importance of non-obtrusiveness to the design of assistive technologies, there remains no standard definition of obtrusiveness or measurement instrument. A conceptual framework for obtrusiveness in home telehealth technologies has recently been proposed but has not yet been tested empirically. This project performed a secondary analysis of focus group and interview data to explore the presence of the dimensions of the obtrusiveness framework in older adults' responses to information-based assistive technologies in residential care facilities. We found the existing data contained examples of each dimension (physical, usability, privacy, function, human interaction, self-concept, routine, and sustainability) and 16 of the 22 subcategories proposed by the obtrusiveness framework. These results provide general support for the framework, although further prospective validation research is needed. Potential enhancements to the framework are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":80069,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","volume":"32 3","pages":"241-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639230701447735","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230701447735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

Abstract

With the anticipated growth in the older adult population in the next few years, information designers are examining new ways for assistive technologies to support independent living and quality of life for adults as they age. Central to the role of assistive technology to support and enhance quality of life is the development of non-obtrusive technologies. Despite the importance of non-obtrusiveness to the design of assistive technologies, there remains no standard definition of obtrusiveness or measurement instrument. A conceptual framework for obtrusiveness in home telehealth technologies has recently been proposed but has not yet been tested empirically. This project performed a secondary analysis of focus group and interview data to explore the presence of the dimensions of the obtrusiveness framework in older adults' responses to information-based assistive technologies in residential care facilities. We found the existing data contained examples of each dimension (physical, usability, privacy, function, human interaction, self-concept, routine, and sustainability) and 16 of the 22 subcategories proposed by the obtrusiveness framework. These results provide general support for the framework, although further prospective validation research is needed. Potential enhancements to the framework are proposed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住宿护理机构中老年人所感知的信息辅助技术的突兀性:一项二次分析。
随着未来几年老年人口的预期增长,信息设计师正在研究辅助技术的新方法,以支持成年人随着年龄的增长而独立生活和提高生活质量。辅助技术在支持和提高生活质量方面的核心作用是开发非突发性技术。尽管非突兀性对辅助技术的设计很重要,但对于突兀性或测量仪器仍然没有标准的定义。最近提出了家庭远程医疗技术中突兀性的概念框架,但尚未经过经验检验。本研究透过焦点小组与访谈资料,探讨突兀性框架的各维度是否存在于安老院舍长者对资讯辅助技术的回应中。我们发现现有的数据包含了每个维度(物理、可用性、隐私、功能、人际互动、自我概念、常规和可持续性)的例子,以及突兀性框架提出的22个子类别中的16个。这些结果为该框架提供了总体支持,尽管还需要进一步的前瞻性验证研究。提出了对该框架的潜在增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICT-based health information services for elderly people: past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. Readability and cultural sensitivity of web-based patient decision aids for cancer screening and treatment: a systematic review. Digital pens and pain diaries in palliative home health care: professional caregivers' experiences. Assisting the transition from hospital to home for children with major congenital heart disease by telemedicine: a feasibility study and initial results. Patients' perceptions of Internet usage and their opportunity to obtain health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1