Mortality amongst babies from injury at birth.

W T RUSSELL, I SUTHERLAND
{"title":"Mortality amongst babies from injury at birth.","authors":"W T RUSSELL, I SUTHERLAND","doi":"10.1136/jech.3.2.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much has been said and written about infant mortality and particularly about its decline. Even statesmen have cited its decrease as suggestive evidence of the benefits which arise from their stewardship. They are, it would seem, oblivious of the fact that the decline is not of recent occurrence but one which has been operating over a period of many years. The facts are easy to appreciate. Fifty years ago the mortality in infancy in England and Wales exceeded 150 per 1,000 births; in 1948 it was 34, an impressive reduction which was particularly observable in the age group 3-12 months. The reduction in the first four weeks of life has been less satisfactory. It may well be asked whether each contributory cause of death in early infancy has declined equally or whether some have declined more than others. If the average annual change in the mortality \" under 4 weeks \" during the period 1931-38 is expressed as a percentage of the mean death rate in that period in England and Wales, the statistical picture for certain broad categories is as in Table I. It will be noted that in four instances the mortality has declined, the annual decrement being largest (9-1 per cent.) for convulsions. The death rate in the two remaining groups, congenital malformations and injury at birth, increased, and the increment for the latter was the greater as the values were 1 1 per cent, and 2-6 per cent, respectively. It should be stated, however, that there is a school of expert medical opinion which regards such observed increments as fictitious. Although it recognizes the total neonatal mortality as a reliable figure, it suggests that the constituent causes defy statistical analysis owing to the inability of doctors in general to state, with any degree of precision, the exact cause of death at this period of life. The difficulties of accurate certification of causes of death in the first four weeks of life are well recognized, but it would se m unlikely that medical men are in the habit of exa gerating birth injury as a cause. Indeed, the joi t report of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the British Paediatric Association (1949) has suggested a much higher rate of mortality from birth injury than is revealed by the Registrar General's tabulations. It is not the province of a statistician to question the v lidity of medical diagnosis. In the absence of a sudden or startling departure from the normal mortality (apart from epidemic experience), he accepts the declared findings as facts although he is, at the same time, fully conscious of the vagaries of medical opinion and the influence of new preci sions on diagnosis. We have been told, however, tha the increments which have been demonstrated in the mortality from injury at birth may possibly be due to a transfer of deaths from asphyxia, atelec tasis, or convulsions. The death rate from con vulsions has declined, and convulsions in children under four weeks are believed, in many instances, to be the aftermath of an injury during delivery. As a t st we calculated the mortality of a combined group of causes of death, namely convulsions, injury at birth, asphyxia, and atelectasis, over a","PeriodicalId":84321,"journal":{"name":"British journal of social medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1949-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jech.3.2.85","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.3.2.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much has been said and written about infant mortality and particularly about its decline. Even statesmen have cited its decrease as suggestive evidence of the benefits which arise from their stewardship. They are, it would seem, oblivious of the fact that the decline is not of recent occurrence but one which has been operating over a period of many years. The facts are easy to appreciate. Fifty years ago the mortality in infancy in England and Wales exceeded 150 per 1,000 births; in 1948 it was 34, an impressive reduction which was particularly observable in the age group 3-12 months. The reduction in the first four weeks of life has been less satisfactory. It may well be asked whether each contributory cause of death in early infancy has declined equally or whether some have declined more than others. If the average annual change in the mortality " under 4 weeks " during the period 1931-38 is expressed as a percentage of the mean death rate in that period in England and Wales, the statistical picture for certain broad categories is as in Table I. It will be noted that in four instances the mortality has declined, the annual decrement being largest (9-1 per cent.) for convulsions. The death rate in the two remaining groups, congenital malformations and injury at birth, increased, and the increment for the latter was the greater as the values were 1 1 per cent, and 2-6 per cent, respectively. It should be stated, however, that there is a school of expert medical opinion which regards such observed increments as fictitious. Although it recognizes the total neonatal mortality as a reliable figure, it suggests that the constituent causes defy statistical analysis owing to the inability of doctors in general to state, with any degree of precision, the exact cause of death at this period of life. The difficulties of accurate certification of causes of death in the first four weeks of life are well recognized, but it would se m unlikely that medical men are in the habit of exa gerating birth injury as a cause. Indeed, the joi t report of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the British Paediatric Association (1949) has suggested a much higher rate of mortality from birth injury than is revealed by the Registrar General's tabulations. It is not the province of a statistician to question the v lidity of medical diagnosis. In the absence of a sudden or startling departure from the normal mortality (apart from epidemic experience), he accepts the declared findings as facts although he is, at the same time, fully conscious of the vagaries of medical opinion and the influence of new preci sions on diagnosis. We have been told, however, tha the increments which have been demonstrated in the mortality from injury at birth may possibly be due to a transfer of deaths from asphyxia, atelec tasis, or convulsions. The death rate from con vulsions has declined, and convulsions in children under four weeks are believed, in many instances, to be the aftermath of an injury during delivery. As a t st we calculated the mortality of a combined group of causes of death, namely convulsions, injury at birth, asphyxia, and atelectasis, over a
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿出生时受伤造成的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical theory of prophylactic and therapeutic trials. II. Methods of operational advantage. Cohort analysis of fertility in England and Wales, 1939-50. Stature of Scotsmen aged 18 to 40 years in 1941. Incidence of neurosis related to maternal age and birth order. Factors influencing sex differences in mortality from respiratory tuberculosis in England and Wales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1