Performance of booster seats in side impacts: effect of adjacent passengers and ISOfix attachment.

Judith L Charlton, Brian Fildes, David Taranto, Ronald Laemmle, Stuart Smith, Anthony Clark
{"title":"Performance of booster seats in side impacts: effect of adjacent passengers and ISOfix attachment.","authors":"Judith L Charlton,&nbsp;Brian Fildes,&nbsp;David Taranto,&nbsp;Ronald Laemmle,&nbsp;Stuart Smith,&nbsp;Anthony Clark","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the performance of a booster seat in different seating configurations in side-impact hyGe sled tests (crash severity 30 km/h) with two attachment systems: a standard seatbelt and ISOfix (rigid). The objectives of the study were twofold: (i) to identify the relative benefits of ISOfix attachment compared with seatbelt attachment of a near-side booster seat in a 3-abreast seating configuration with adjacent occupants in child restraints (CRS); and (ii) to examine the effects of 3-abreast seating configurations compared with no adjacent passengers on booster seat crash protection characteristics. Overall, the findings confirmed the superior performance of the rigid anchorages in reducing lateral motion of the booster as well as the two adjacent CRS. However, the expected benefits of the rigid attachment in reducing head accelerations were not uniformly observed across the three occupants/seating positions and also appeared to be influenced by seating configuration (3-abreast versus no adjacent occupant). Further research is warranted to explore the applicability of the findings for different CRS types and seating configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":80490,"journal":{"name":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","volume":"51 ","pages":"155-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217517/pdf/aam51_p155.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the performance of a booster seat in different seating configurations in side-impact hyGe sled tests (crash severity 30 km/h) with two attachment systems: a standard seatbelt and ISOfix (rigid). The objectives of the study were twofold: (i) to identify the relative benefits of ISOfix attachment compared with seatbelt attachment of a near-side booster seat in a 3-abreast seating configuration with adjacent occupants in child restraints (CRS); and (ii) to examine the effects of 3-abreast seating configurations compared with no adjacent passengers on booster seat crash protection characteristics. Overall, the findings confirmed the superior performance of the rigid anchorages in reducing lateral motion of the booster as well as the two adjacent CRS. However, the expected benefits of the rigid attachment in reducing head accelerations were not uniformly observed across the three occupants/seating positions and also appeared to be influenced by seating configuration (3-abreast versus no adjacent occupant). Further research is warranted to explore the applicability of the findings for different CRS types and seating configurations.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧撞时增高座椅的性能:相邻乘客的影响和ISOfix附着。
本研究通过两种附加系统:标准安全带和ISOfix(刚性),测试了不同座椅配置下的侧碰撞hyGe滑橇试验(碰撞严重程度为30 km/h)中助推座椅的性能。该研究的目的是双重的:(i)确定在与儿童约束装置(CRS)相邻乘员的3并排座椅配置中,与近侧助推座椅的安全带连接相比,ISOfix连接的相对优势;(ii)与没有相邻乘客的情况相比,检查3人并排座位配置对增强座椅防撞特性的影响。总的来说,研究结果证实了刚性锚固在减少助推器以及相邻两个CRS的横向运动方面的优越性能。然而,刚性连接在减少头部加速度方面的预期好处并不是在三个乘客/座位位置上一致观察到的,而且似乎也受到座位配置的影响(3人并排或没有相邻乘客)。研究结果是否适用于不同的CRS类型和座位配置还有待进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Other high-risk factors for young drivers - how graduated licensing does, doesn't or could address them. Characteristics on fractures of tibia and fibula in car impacts to pedestrians and bicyclists - influences of car bumper height and shape. The impacts of functional performance, behaviour and traffic exposure on road-crossing judgements of young children. The association between age, injury, and survival to hospital among a cohort of injured motorcyclists. Are child passengers bringing up the rear? Evidence for differential improvements in injury risk between drivers and their child passengers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1