LAVIA--an evaluation of the potential safety benefits of the French intelligent speed adaptation project.

R Driscoll, Y Page, S Lassarre, J Ehrlich
{"title":"LAVIA--an evaluation of the potential safety benefits of the French intelligent speed adaptation project.","authors":"R Driscoll,&nbsp;Y Page,&nbsp;S Lassarre,&nbsp;J Ehrlich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents the potential safety benefits of the experimental French LAVIA Intelligent Speed Adaptation system, according to road network and system mode, based on observed driving speeds, distributions of crash severity and crash injury risk. Results are given for car frontal and side impacts that together, represent 80% of all serious and fatal injuries in France. Of the three system modes tested (advisory, driver select, mandatory), our results suggest that driver select would most significantly reduce serious injuries and death. We estimate this 100% utilization of cars equipped with this type of speed adaptation system would decrease injury rates by 6% to 16% over existing conditions depending on the type of crash (frontal or side) and road environment considered. Some limitations associated with the analysis are also identified. LAVIA is the acronym for Limiteur s'Adaptant à la VItesse Autorisée, a French Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) project that was set up towards the end of 1999. At the time, 1998 French national road safety statistics recorded 8437 road related deaths, a figure which had shown virtually no positive evolution since 1994. Detailed analysis of the contributory factors involved in fatal road crashes highlighted the time-honoured crash and injury causation mechanisms - alcohol, speed and seatbelts. Of the three, excessive speed (over and above the posted speed limit) was a contributory factor in half of all fatal crashes Inappropriate behaviour such as excessive speeding can be dealt with either by legislative or driver-incentive programmes. The first of these two solutions involves the introduction of new legislation and/or the enforcement of existing laws. This is the domain of Public Authorities and will not be discussed in detail here. Alternatively, incentive schemes can involve the implementation of speed related driver assistance systems, categorised according to their voluntary or mandatory character and the degree of autonomy proposed to or imposed on the driver. The LAVIA project set out to address several possible combinations of these two factors. The generic term Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) encompasses a wide range of different technologies aimed at improving road safety by reducing traffic speed and homogenising traffic flow, within the limit of posted speed limits. \"Fixed speed limit\" systems inform the vehicle of the posted speed limit whereas \"variable speed limit\" systems take into account certain locations on the road network where a speed below the posted limit is desirable, such as sharp curves, pedestrian crossings or crash black spots. Taken one step further, speed limit systems may also take into account weather and traffic flow conditions. These systems are known as \"dynamic speed limit\" systems and benefit from real time updates for a specific location. The different ISA systems are generally characterised by the degree of freedom of choice given to the driver in moderating his or her speed. Speed limit technologies may be advisory (informing drivers of the current speed limit and speed limit changes), voluntary (allowing the driver to decide whether or not to implement speed limitation) or mandatory (imposing the current speed limit). The information supplied may be provided by way of the road infrastructure (and associated equipment), may be acquired autonomously by the vehicle or may be based on an interaction between the infrastructure and the vehicle. Even the most basic of these systems should be considered as a very useful driver aid, helping the driver to stay within the posted speed limit, avoiding \"unnecessary\" speeding fines through inattention, modelling driver behaviour through the long term reduction of speeds and reducing driver workload by limiting visual speedometer controls. Vehicle-based ISA systems should not be confused with internal systems. These latter systems rely upon the driver entering the desired travel speed, which is then maintained by cruise control or set as a maximum value by automatic speed regulators. Although these systems will not be discussed in detail here, it should be noted that the engine management technologies that they employ are a vital component of ISA systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":80490,"journal":{"name":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","volume":"51 ","pages":"485-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217520/pdf/aam51_p485.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the potential safety benefits of the experimental French LAVIA Intelligent Speed Adaptation system, according to road network and system mode, based on observed driving speeds, distributions of crash severity and crash injury risk. Results are given for car frontal and side impacts that together, represent 80% of all serious and fatal injuries in France. Of the three system modes tested (advisory, driver select, mandatory), our results suggest that driver select would most significantly reduce serious injuries and death. We estimate this 100% utilization of cars equipped with this type of speed adaptation system would decrease injury rates by 6% to 16% over existing conditions depending on the type of crash (frontal or side) and road environment considered. Some limitations associated with the analysis are also identified. LAVIA is the acronym for Limiteur s'Adaptant à la VItesse Autorisée, a French Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) project that was set up towards the end of 1999. At the time, 1998 French national road safety statistics recorded 8437 road related deaths, a figure which had shown virtually no positive evolution since 1994. Detailed analysis of the contributory factors involved in fatal road crashes highlighted the time-honoured crash and injury causation mechanisms - alcohol, speed and seatbelts. Of the three, excessive speed (over and above the posted speed limit) was a contributory factor in half of all fatal crashes Inappropriate behaviour such as excessive speeding can be dealt with either by legislative or driver-incentive programmes. The first of these two solutions involves the introduction of new legislation and/or the enforcement of existing laws. This is the domain of Public Authorities and will not be discussed in detail here. Alternatively, incentive schemes can involve the implementation of speed related driver assistance systems, categorised according to their voluntary or mandatory character and the degree of autonomy proposed to or imposed on the driver. The LAVIA project set out to address several possible combinations of these two factors. The generic term Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) encompasses a wide range of different technologies aimed at improving road safety by reducing traffic speed and homogenising traffic flow, within the limit of posted speed limits. "Fixed speed limit" systems inform the vehicle of the posted speed limit whereas "variable speed limit" systems take into account certain locations on the road network where a speed below the posted limit is desirable, such as sharp curves, pedestrian crossings or crash black spots. Taken one step further, speed limit systems may also take into account weather and traffic flow conditions. These systems are known as "dynamic speed limit" systems and benefit from real time updates for a specific location. The different ISA systems are generally characterised by the degree of freedom of choice given to the driver in moderating his or her speed. Speed limit technologies may be advisory (informing drivers of the current speed limit and speed limit changes), voluntary (allowing the driver to decide whether or not to implement speed limitation) or mandatory (imposing the current speed limit). The information supplied may be provided by way of the road infrastructure (and associated equipment), may be acquired autonomously by the vehicle or may be based on an interaction between the infrastructure and the vehicle. Even the most basic of these systems should be considered as a very useful driver aid, helping the driver to stay within the posted speed limit, avoiding "unnecessary" speeding fines through inattention, modelling driver behaviour through the long term reduction of speeds and reducing driver workload by limiting visual speedometer controls. Vehicle-based ISA systems should not be confused with internal systems. These latter systems rely upon the driver entering the desired travel speed, which is then maintained by cruise control or set as a maximum value by automatic speed regulators. Although these systems will not be discussed in detail here, it should be noted that the engine management technologies that they employ are a vital component of ISA systems.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LAVIA——对法国智能速度适应项目潜在安全效益的评估。
本文介绍了实验性法国LAVIA智能速度自适应系统的潜在安全效益,该系统根据道路网络和系统模式,基于观察到的行驶速度、碰撞严重程度分布和碰撞伤害风险。结果给出了汽车正面和侧面碰撞的结果,这些碰撞占法国所有严重和致命伤害的80%。在测试的三种系统模式(建议、驾驶员选择、强制)中,我们的结果表明驾驶员选择将最显著地减少严重伤害和死亡。我们估计,根据碰撞类型(正面或侧面)和道路环境的不同,配备这种速度适应系统的汽车的100%利用率将使受伤率比现有条件降低6%至16%。还指出了与分析相关的一些限制。LAVIA是Limiteur s'Adaptant la VItesse autoris e的首字母缩略词,是法国智能速度适应(ISA)项目,于1999年底成立。1998年,法国国家道路安全统计数字记录了8437起与道路有关的死亡,这一数字自1994年以来几乎没有任何积极的变化。对致命道路交通事故所涉及的促成因素进行的详细分析强调了历史悠久的事故和伤害原因机制——酒精、速度和安全带。在这三种情况中,超速(超过公布的速度限制)是造成一半致命车祸的一个因素。超速等不当行为可以通过立法或司机激励计划来处理。这两种解决办法中的第一种涉及提出新的立法和/或执行现有法律。这是公共当局的领域,在此不作详细讨论。另外,奖励计划可以包括实施与速度有关的驾驶员辅助系统,根据其自愿或强制性质以及建议或强加给驾驶员的自主程度进行分类。LAVIA项目着手处理这两个因素的几种可能组合。通用术语智能速度适应(ISA)包括一系列不同的技术,旨在通过在限速范围内降低交通速度和均匀交通流量来改善道路安全。“固定速度限制”系统会通知车辆张贴的速度限制,而“可变速度限制”系统则会考虑道路网络上某些需要低于张贴速度限制的地点,例如急转弯、行人过路处或撞车黑点。更进一步,限速系统还可以考虑天气和交通状况。这些系统被称为“动态限速”系统,并受益于特定位置的实时更新。不同的ISA系统通常以驾驶员在减速方面的自由选择程度为特征。限速技术可以是咨询式的(告知驾驶员当前的限速和限速变化),自愿式的(允许驾驶员决定是否实施限速)或强制性的(实施当前的限速)。所提供的信息可以通过道路基础设施(及相关设备)提供,也可以由车辆自主获取,也可以基于基础设施与车辆之间的交互。即使是最基本的这些系统也应该被认为是一个非常有用的驾驶员辅助工具,帮助驾驶员保持在张贴的速度限制内,避免因注意力不集中而“不必要的”超速罚款,通过长期降低速度来模拟驾驶员的行为,并通过限制视觉速度计控制来减少驾驶员的工作量。基于车辆的ISA系统不应与内部系统相混淆。后一种系统依赖于驾驶员输入所需的行驶速度,然后由巡航控制系统维持或由自动速度调节器设置为最大值。虽然这里不会详细讨论这些系统,但应该注意的是,它们使用的引擎管理技术是ISA系统的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Other high-risk factors for young drivers - how graduated licensing does, doesn't or could address them. Characteristics on fractures of tibia and fibula in car impacts to pedestrians and bicyclists - influences of car bumper height and shape. The impacts of functional performance, behaviour and traffic exposure on road-crossing judgements of young children. The association between age, injury, and survival to hospital among a cohort of injured motorcyclists. Are child passengers bringing up the rear? Evidence for differential improvements in injury risk between drivers and their child passengers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1