An open-source framework for large-scale, flexible evaluation of biomedical text mining systems.

William A Baumgartner, K Bretonnel Cohen, Lawrence Hunter
{"title":"An open-source framework for large-scale, flexible evaluation of biomedical text mining systems.","authors":"William A Baumgartner,&nbsp;K Bretonnel Cohen,&nbsp;Lawrence Hunter","doi":"10.1186/1747-5333-3-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improved evaluation methodologies have been identified as a necessary prerequisite to the improvement of text mining theory and practice. This paper presents a publicly available framework that facilitates thorough, structured, and large-scale evaluations of text mining technologies. The extensibility of this framework and its ability to uncover system-wide characteristics by analyzing component parts as well as its usefulness for facilitating third-party application integration are demonstrated through examples in the biomedical domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our evaluation framework was assembled using the Unstructured Information Management Architecture. It was used to analyze a set of gene mention identification systems involving 225 combinations of system, evaluation corpus, and correctness measure. Interactions between all three were found to affect the relative rankings of the systems. A second experiment evaluated gene normalization system performance using as input 4,097 combinations of gene mention systems and gene mention system-combining strategies. Gene mention system recall is shown to affect gene normalization system performance much more than does gene mention system precision, and high gene normalization performance is shown to be achievable with remarkably low levels of gene mention system precision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The software presented in this paper demonstrates the potential for novel discovery resulting from the structured evaluation of biomedical language processing systems, as well as the usefulness of such an evaluation framework for promoting collaboration between developers of biomedical language processing technologies. The code base is available as part of the BioNLP UIMA Component Repository on SourceForge.net.</p>","PeriodicalId":87404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1747-5333-3-1","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-3-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

Background: Improved evaluation methodologies have been identified as a necessary prerequisite to the improvement of text mining theory and practice. This paper presents a publicly available framework that facilitates thorough, structured, and large-scale evaluations of text mining technologies. The extensibility of this framework and its ability to uncover system-wide characteristics by analyzing component parts as well as its usefulness for facilitating third-party application integration are demonstrated through examples in the biomedical domain.

Results: Our evaluation framework was assembled using the Unstructured Information Management Architecture. It was used to analyze a set of gene mention identification systems involving 225 combinations of system, evaluation corpus, and correctness measure. Interactions between all three were found to affect the relative rankings of the systems. A second experiment evaluated gene normalization system performance using as input 4,097 combinations of gene mention systems and gene mention system-combining strategies. Gene mention system recall is shown to affect gene normalization system performance much more than does gene mention system precision, and high gene normalization performance is shown to be achievable with remarkably low levels of gene mention system precision.

Conclusion: The software presented in this paper demonstrates the potential for novel discovery resulting from the structured evaluation of biomedical language processing systems, as well as the usefulness of such an evaluation framework for promoting collaboration between developers of biomedical language processing technologies. The code base is available as part of the BioNLP UIMA Component Repository on SourceForge.net.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个用于大规模、灵活评估生物医学文本挖掘系统的开源框架。
背景:改进的评价方法已被确定为改进文本挖掘理论和实践的必要前提。本文提出了一个公开可用的框架,它有助于对文本挖掘技术进行全面、结构化和大规模的评估。该框架的可扩展性及其通过分析组件部件揭示系统范围特征的能力,以及它在促进第三方应用程序集成方面的有用性,都通过生物医学领域的示例得到了证明。结果:我们的评估框架是使用非结构化信息管理体系结构组装的。运用该方法对225个系统、评价语料库和正确性测度组合的基因提及识别系统进行了分析。研究发现,这三者之间的相互作用会影响系统的相对排名。第二个实验评估了基因规范化系统的性能,使用4097个基因提及系统和基因提及系统组合策略的组合作为输入。研究表明,基因提及系统召回对基因规范化系统性能的影响远大于基因提及系统精度的影响,而高的基因规范化性能可以在极低的基因提及系统精度水平下实现。结论:本文展示的软件展示了生物医学语言处理系统的结构化评估所带来的新发现的潜力,以及这种评估框架对促进生物医学语言处理技术开发人员之间协作的有用性。代码库是SourceForge.net上BioNLP UIMA组件存储库的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Two Similarity Metrics for Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): An Aid to Biomedical Text Mining and Author Name Disambiguation. The language of discovery. Bias associated with mining electronic health records. Literature-based Resurrection of Neglected Medical Discoveries. A cognitive task analysis of a visual analytic workflow: Exploring molecular interaction networks in systems biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1