Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in intensive care.

F A Rasulo, E De Peri, A Lavinio
{"title":"Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in intensive care.","authors":"F A Rasulo,&nbsp;E De Peri,&nbsp;A Lavinio","doi":"10.1017/S0265021507003341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial Doppler is an innovative, flexible, accessible tool for the bedside monitoring of static and dynamic cerebral flow and treatment response. Introduced by Rune Aaslid in 1982, it has become indispensable in clinical practice. The main obstacle to ultrasound penetration of the skull is bone. Low frequencies, 1-2 MHz, reduce the attenuation of the ultrasound wave caused by bone. Transcranial Doppler also provides the advantage of acoustic windows representing specific points of the skull where the bone is thin enough to allow ultrasounds to penetrate. There are four acoustic windows: transtemporal, transorbital, suboccipital and retromandibular. The identification of each intracranial vessel is based on the following elements: (a) velocity and direction; (b) depth of signal capture; (c) possibility of following the vessel its whole length; (d) spatial relationship with other vessels; and (e) response to homolateral and contralateral carotid compression. The main fields of clinical application of transcranial Doppler are assessment of vasospasm, detection of stenosis of the intracranial arteries, evaluation of cerebrovascular autoregulation, non-invasive estimation of intracranial pressure, measure of effective downstream pressure and assessment of brain death. Mean flow velocity is directly proportional to flow and inversely proportional to the section of the vessel. Any circumstance that leads to a variation of one of these factors can thus affect mean velocity. The main pathological condition affecting flow velocity is the vasospasm. Vasospasm is a frequent complication of subarachnoid haemorrhage, it often remains clinically silent and the factors that make it symptomatic are largely unknown. Threshold velocities above which vasospasm comes into place are well defined as regards the median cerebral artery, while there is no consensus for the other vessels. Nevertheless, an increase in velocity alone is not sufficient to arrive at a diagnosis of vasospasm; a condition of hyperaemia also presents with an increase in flow velocity. The Lindegaard Index has therefore been introduced, which is defined by the ratio between the mean flow velocity in the median cerebral artery and the mean flow velocity in the internal carotid artery. Criteria for diagnosis of a stenosis >50% of an intracranial vessel with transcranial Doppler include: (a) segmentary acceleration of flow velocity; (b) drop in velocity below the stenotic segment; (c) asymmetry; and (d) circumscribed flow disturbances (turbulence and musical murmur). The transcranial Doppler enables us to assess both components of self-regulation. The static component is measured by observing changes in flow velocity caused by pharmacologically induced episodes of hypertension and hypotension. The dynamic component of autoregulation can be measured using a method devised by Aaslid known as the 'cuff test'. A very effective and safe device for measuring cerebral autoregulation is the transient hyperaemic response test. This test is based on the compensatory vasodilatation of the arterioles, which occurs after brief compression of the common carotid. Csonyka proposed the following formula based on clinical observation for the calculation of cerebral perfusion pressure: CPP = MAP x FVd/FVm + 14. Brain death is defined as the irreversible cessation of all functions of the whole brain. The clinical criteria are usually considered sufficient to establish a diagnosis of brain death; however, they might not be sufficient in patients who have been on sedatives or when there are ethical or legal controversies. Many authors have demonstrated the existence of a transcranial Doppler pattern, which is typical of brain death.</p>","PeriodicalId":11873,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0265021507003341","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021507003341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

Transcranial Doppler is an innovative, flexible, accessible tool for the bedside monitoring of static and dynamic cerebral flow and treatment response. Introduced by Rune Aaslid in 1982, it has become indispensable in clinical practice. The main obstacle to ultrasound penetration of the skull is bone. Low frequencies, 1-2 MHz, reduce the attenuation of the ultrasound wave caused by bone. Transcranial Doppler also provides the advantage of acoustic windows representing specific points of the skull where the bone is thin enough to allow ultrasounds to penetrate. There are four acoustic windows: transtemporal, transorbital, suboccipital and retromandibular. The identification of each intracranial vessel is based on the following elements: (a) velocity and direction; (b) depth of signal capture; (c) possibility of following the vessel its whole length; (d) spatial relationship with other vessels; and (e) response to homolateral and contralateral carotid compression. The main fields of clinical application of transcranial Doppler are assessment of vasospasm, detection of stenosis of the intracranial arteries, evaluation of cerebrovascular autoregulation, non-invasive estimation of intracranial pressure, measure of effective downstream pressure and assessment of brain death. Mean flow velocity is directly proportional to flow and inversely proportional to the section of the vessel. Any circumstance that leads to a variation of one of these factors can thus affect mean velocity. The main pathological condition affecting flow velocity is the vasospasm. Vasospasm is a frequent complication of subarachnoid haemorrhage, it often remains clinically silent and the factors that make it symptomatic are largely unknown. Threshold velocities above which vasospasm comes into place are well defined as regards the median cerebral artery, while there is no consensus for the other vessels. Nevertheless, an increase in velocity alone is not sufficient to arrive at a diagnosis of vasospasm; a condition of hyperaemia also presents with an increase in flow velocity. The Lindegaard Index has therefore been introduced, which is defined by the ratio between the mean flow velocity in the median cerebral artery and the mean flow velocity in the internal carotid artery. Criteria for diagnosis of a stenosis >50% of an intracranial vessel with transcranial Doppler include: (a) segmentary acceleration of flow velocity; (b) drop in velocity below the stenotic segment; (c) asymmetry; and (d) circumscribed flow disturbances (turbulence and musical murmur). The transcranial Doppler enables us to assess both components of self-regulation. The static component is measured by observing changes in flow velocity caused by pharmacologically induced episodes of hypertension and hypotension. The dynamic component of autoregulation can be measured using a method devised by Aaslid known as the 'cuff test'. A very effective and safe device for measuring cerebral autoregulation is the transient hyperaemic response test. This test is based on the compensatory vasodilatation of the arterioles, which occurs after brief compression of the common carotid. Csonyka proposed the following formula based on clinical observation for the calculation of cerebral perfusion pressure: CPP = MAP x FVd/FVm + 14. Brain death is defined as the irreversible cessation of all functions of the whole brain. The clinical criteria are usually considered sufficient to establish a diagnosis of brain death; however, they might not be sufficient in patients who have been on sedatives or when there are ethical or legal controversies. Many authors have demonstrated the existence of a transcranial Doppler pattern, which is typical of brain death.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅多普勒超声在重症监护中的应用。
经颅多普勒是一种创新的、灵活的、可访问的床边监测静态和动态脑血流和治疗反应的工具。1982年由Rune Aaslid引入,它已成为临床实践中不可或缺的一部分。超声波穿透颅骨的主要障碍是骨头。低频率,1-2兆赫,减少骨骼造成的超声波衰减。经颅多普勒还提供了声学窗口的优势,声学窗口代表头骨的特定点,在这些点上,骨骼足够薄,可以让超声波穿透。有四个声窗:经颞、经眶、枕下和下颌后。每条颅内血管的识别基于以下要素:(a)速度和方向;(b)信号捕获深度;(c)全程跟随船舶的可能性;(d)与其他船只的空间关系;(e)对同侧和对侧颈动脉压迫的反应。经颅多普勒临床应用的主要领域有血管痉挛的评估、颅内动脉狭窄的检测、脑血管自身调节的评估、无创颅内压的估计、有效下游压力的测量和脑死亡的评估。平均流速与流量成正比,与容器的截面成反比。任何导致这些因素之一发生变化的情况都会影响平均速度。影响血流速度的主要病理状态是血管痉挛。血管痉挛是蛛网膜下腔出血的常见并发症,它通常在临床上保持沉默,使其有症状的因素在很大程度上是未知的。对于大脑正中动脉来说,超过血管痉挛的阈值速度是明确的,而对于其他血管则没有一致的看法。然而,单凭流速增加不足以诊断血管痉挛;充血的情况也表现为血流速度的增加。因此引入了Lindegaard指数,它是由大脑中动脉平均流速与颈内动脉平均流速之比来定义的。经颅多普勒诊断颅内血管狭窄>50%的标准包括:(a)段性流速加速;(b)狭窄段以下流速下降;(c)不对称;(d)受限的流动扰动(湍流和音乐杂音)。经颅多普勒使我们能够评估自我调节的两个组成部分。静态成分是通过观察药物诱导的高血压和低血压发作引起的血流速度变化来测量的。自动调节的动态成分可以使用Aaslid设计的称为“袖带测试”的方法来测量。短暂性充血反应试验是一种非常有效和安全的测量大脑自动调节的方法。这个测试是基于小动脉的代偿性血管扩张,在短暂压迫颈总动脉后发生。Csonyka根据临床观察提出脑灌注压计算公式:CPP = MAP x FVd/FVm + 14。脑死亡被定义为整个大脑所有功能的不可逆转的停止。临床标准通常被认为足以确定脑死亡的诊断;然而,对于服用镇静剂的患者或存在伦理或法律争议的患者,这些可能是不够的。许多作者已经证明了经颅多普勒模式的存在,这是典型的脑死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in a piglet model: readings are influenced by the colour of the cover Clinical sedation and bispectral index in burn children receiving gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Acute Normovolemic hemodilution during CABG induces diastolic dysfunction: A perioperative transesophageal echocardiographic study EuroNeuro 2010. Abstracts of the 6th EuroNeuro Congress. Porto, Portugal. February 4-6, 2010. 5th EuroNeuro 2008. Maastricht, The Netherlands. January 16-19, 2008. Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1