Effectiveness Evaluation of a Remote Accessibility Assessment System for Wheelchair Users Using Virtualized Reality

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2008-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.158
Jongbae Kim PhD , David M. Brienza PhD , Robert D. Lynch , Rory A. Cooper PhD , Michael L. Boninger MD
{"title":"Effectiveness Evaluation of a Remote Accessibility Assessment System for Wheelchair Users Using Virtualized Reality","authors":"Jongbae Kim PhD ,&nbsp;David M. Brienza PhD ,&nbsp;Robert D. Lynch ,&nbsp;Rory A. Cooper PhD ,&nbsp;Michael L. Boninger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Kim J, Brienza DM, Lynch RD, Cooper RA, Boninger ML. Effectiveness evaluation of a remote accessibility assessment system for wheelchair users using virtualized reality.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the value of the Remote Accessibility Assessment System (RAAS), a 3-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction technology designed to analyze accessibility of the target built environment in a virtualized reality, in assessing a built environment’s accessibility by calculating the congruence level between the RAAS and conventional in-person method.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Repeated-measures (within-subject) design.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A university research laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Three homes for people who use wheeled mobility devices.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Home physical environment was divided into several potential problem areas such as entrance, hallway, bathroom, and living room. Each area was identified by several tasks that might be performed in it. All possible tasks in each area within each home were evaluated using 2 methods: RAAS and the conventional in-person assessment. The evaluations were performed by a different home modification specialist for each method.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Conventional in-person assessments were cross-tabulated with assessments from RAAS, with which there are 4 possible assessment combinations. A true positive (checked–checked) occurs when the RAAS method checks the target task as problematic and it is also checked as problematic by the conventional in-person method. True negative (not checked–not checked), false positive (not checked–checked), and false negative (checked–not checked) were also identified as the same way.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The proportion of overall agreement was high at 94.1% and the overall sensitivity and specificity was 95.6% and 90.3%, respectively. A significant κ coefficient of .857 and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio of 104.062 to 404.921 were calculated and a high level of overall agreement rate was shown. A high </span><em>P</em><span> value (.868) of the McNemar test implied that there was no marginal homogeneity, that is, no tendency to identify the task incorrectly in the positive or negative direction.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This system proved that virtualized reality and 3D reconstruction technology may provide an effective means to investigate the architectural features of a built environment without an expert visiting the site. This system could become an efficient tool for the service provider and can provide expert service to underserved clients that would otherwise be unavailable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"89 3","pages":"Pages 470-479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.158","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000399930701739X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Kim J, Brienza DM, Lynch RD, Cooper RA, Boninger ML. Effectiveness evaluation of a remote accessibility assessment system for wheelchair users using virtualized reality.

Objective

To determine the value of the Remote Accessibility Assessment System (RAAS), a 3-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction technology designed to analyze accessibility of the target built environment in a virtualized reality, in assessing a built environment’s accessibility by calculating the congruence level between the RAAS and conventional in-person method.

Design

Repeated-measures (within-subject) design.

Setting

A university research laboratory.

Participants

Three homes for people who use wheeled mobility devices.

Intervention

Home physical environment was divided into several potential problem areas such as entrance, hallway, bathroom, and living room. Each area was identified by several tasks that might be performed in it. All possible tasks in each area within each home were evaluated using 2 methods: RAAS and the conventional in-person assessment. The evaluations were performed by a different home modification specialist for each method.

Main Outcome Measures

Conventional in-person assessments were cross-tabulated with assessments from RAAS, with which there are 4 possible assessment combinations. A true positive (checked–checked) occurs when the RAAS method checks the target task as problematic and it is also checked as problematic by the conventional in-person method. True negative (not checked–not checked), false positive (not checked–checked), and false negative (checked–not checked) were also identified as the same way.

Results

The proportion of overall agreement was high at 94.1% and the overall sensitivity and specificity was 95.6% and 90.3%, respectively. A significant κ coefficient of .857 and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio of 104.062 to 404.921 were calculated and a high level of overall agreement rate was shown. A high P value (.868) of the McNemar test implied that there was no marginal homogeneity, that is, no tendency to identify the task incorrectly in the positive or negative direction.

Conclusions

This system proved that virtualized reality and 3D reconstruction technology may provide an effective means to investigate the architectural features of a built environment without an expert visiting the site. This system could become an efficient tool for the service provider and can provide expert service to underserved clients that would otherwise be unavailable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于虚拟现实技术的轮椅远程无障碍评估系统的有效性评价
李建军,李建军,李建军,等。基于虚拟现实技术的轮椅远程可达性评估系统的有效性评价。目的通过计算远程可达性评估系统(RAAS)与传统面对面方法的一致性,确定远程可达性评估系统(RAAS)在评估虚拟现实中目标建筑环境可达性方面的价值。RAAS是一种三维图像重建技术,旨在分析虚拟现实中目标建筑环境的可达性。设计重复测量(主题内)设计。大学研究实验室。参与者为使用轮式移动设备的人提供了三个家。家庭物理环境被划分为几个潜在的问题区域,如入口、走廊、浴室和客厅。每个区域由可能在其中执行的几个任务确定。采用两种方法对每个家庭中每个区域的所有可能任务进行评估:RAAS和传统的面对面评估。评估由不同的家庭改造专家为每种方法执行。主要观察指标:将传统的面对面评估与RAAS评估交叉列表,其中有4种可能的评估组合。当RAAS方法将目标任务检查为有问题,并且传统的面对面方法也将其检查为有问题时,就会出现真阳性(已检查-已检查)。真阴性(未检查-未检查)、假阳性(未检查-已检查)和假阴性(检查-未检查)也以同样的方式识别。结果总体符合率为94.1%,总体敏感性和特异性分别为95.6%和90.3%。计算出显著的κ系数为0.857,优势比为104.062 ~ 404.921的95%置信区间,显示出较高的总体一致性。McNemar检验的高P值(.868)暗示不存在边际同质性,即不存在在积极或消极方向上错误识别任务的倾向。结论该系统证明了虚拟现实和三维重建技术可以提供一种无需专家实地考察建筑环境建筑特征的有效手段。该系统可以成为服务提供者的有效工具,并可以向服务不足的客户提供专家服务,否则这些客户将无法获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Leisure-time physical activity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide cohort study. Examining Pain Subgroups One and Five Years After Spinal Cord Injury: The Importance of Depression in Chronic Pain. Measurement Properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-10) in Individuals with Chronic Shoulder Pain. In-hospital Physical Activity Predicts Swallowing Function at Discharge in Patients with Hip Fracture: A Prospective Study in Convalescent Rehabilitation Wards (1) Running head In-Hospital Activity Predicts Swallowing. Understanding and Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Caregivers of Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury and Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1