Electrocardiographic intervals in the healthy geriatric population--what are the "normals"?

Latha G Stead, Lekshmi Vaidyanathan, Raquel M Schears, Rachel M Gilmore, Krishna C Vedula, Sandhya R Behera, M Fernanda Bellolio, Gerald T Gau, Wyatt W Decker
{"title":"Electrocardiographic intervals in the healthy geriatric population--what are the \"normals\"?","authors":"Latha G Stead,&nbsp;Lekshmi Vaidyanathan,&nbsp;Raquel M Schears,&nbsp;Rachel M Gilmore,&nbsp;Krishna C Vedula,&nbsp;Sandhya R Behera,&nbsp;M Fernanda Bellolio,&nbsp;Gerald T Gau,&nbsp;Wyatt W Decker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors compared the average electrocardiographic (ECG) intervals in a population of patients 80 years and older with published \"normal\" values. The medical records of patients who presented to the Mayo Clinic for health maintenance examinations and who had a routine ECG performed (N=702) were selected. Age; sex; rhythm; PR, QRS, and QTc intervals; incidence of cardiac disease; and presence of interval-prolonging medication were recorded. Reference ranges were estimated from the data and compared with standard cutoffs for prolonged intervals. Interval values were significantly higher in men. Reference ranges were established separately for both sexes based on the subset of 578 patients without a history of cardiac disease and not taking interval-prolonging medication. In all instances, the ranges were higher than the recommended cutoffs. The upper limits for prolonged PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were found to be significantly higher in a population of patients older than 80 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":55533,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","volume":"17 2","pages":"87-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors compared the average electrocardiographic (ECG) intervals in a population of patients 80 years and older with published "normal" values. The medical records of patients who presented to the Mayo Clinic for health maintenance examinations and who had a routine ECG performed (N=702) were selected. Age; sex; rhythm; PR, QRS, and QTc intervals; incidence of cardiac disease; and presence of interval-prolonging medication were recorded. Reference ranges were estimated from the data and compared with standard cutoffs for prolonged intervals. Interval values were significantly higher in men. Reference ranges were established separately for both sexes based on the subset of 578 patients without a history of cardiac disease and not taking interval-prolonging medication. In all instances, the ranges were higher than the recommended cutoffs. The upper limits for prolonged PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were found to be significantly higher in a population of patients older than 80 years.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康老年人群的心电图间隔——什么是“正常”?
作者将80岁及以上患者的平均心电图间隔与公布的“正常”值进行了比较。选取到梅奥诊所进行健康维护检查和常规心电图检查的患者病历(N=702)。年龄;性;节奏;PR、QRS和QTc间隔;心脏病发病率;并记录是否存在延长间隔的药物。从数据中估计出参考范围,并与较长时间间隔的标准截止值进行比较。男性的间隔值明显更高。根据578名无心脏病史且未服用延长间隔药物的患者,分别为两性建立了参考范围。在所有情况下,范围都高于建议的截止值。PR、QRS和QTc间隔延长的上限在80岁以上的患者群体中明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Society of Geriatric Cardiology Ethical Issues in the Management of Geriatric Cardiac Patients Ethical Issues in the Management of Geriatric Cardiac Patients Ethical Issues in the Management of Geriatric Cardiac Patients Treatment of Elderly Hypertensive Patients With a Delayed-Release Verapamil Formulation in a Community-Based Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1