Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Pub Date : 2008-04-01 Epub Date: 2008-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5
Nirav Y Raval, Pierre Squara, Michael Cleman, Kishore Yalamanchili, Michael Winklmaier, Daniel Burkhoff
{"title":"Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique.","authors":"Nirav Y Raval,&nbsp;Pierre Squara,&nbsp;Michael Cleman,&nbsp;Kishore Yalamanchili,&nbsp;Michael Winklmaier,&nbsp;Daniel Burkhoff","doi":"10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bioreactance, the analysis of intrabeat variations in phase of a transthoracic voltage in response to an applied high frequency transthoracic current, was recently introduced for noninvasive cardiac output measurement (NICOM). We evaluated NICOM compared to thermo- dilution (TD) in several clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>111 patients with a clinical indication for TD cardiac output (CO) measurement were recruited at five centers, including patients in cardiac catheterization laboratories, cardiac care units and intensive care units. CO measurements were made simulta- neously with TD and the bioreactance method and compared by regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For studies in the intensive care units, TD-based CO and NICOM were highly correlated (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) and did not differ significantly from each other (P = 0.55). Results in the cardiac catheterization laboratory were similar (r = 0.71, P < 0.001; P = 0.28 NICOM versus TD). In subsets of patients, NICOM was shown to be better corre- lated with TD-CO than CO obtained with the Fick method or with standard bioimpedance-based measurements of CO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, compared to TD, bioreactance- based NICOM has acceptable accuracy in challenging clinical environments. Availability of such a tool may allow clinicians to have information about CO in patients where this information is not currently available to help diagnosis and guide therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":"22 2","pages":"113-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5","citationCount":"209","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 209

Abstract

Objectives: Bioreactance, the analysis of intrabeat variations in phase of a transthoracic voltage in response to an applied high frequency transthoracic current, was recently introduced for noninvasive cardiac output measurement (NICOM). We evaluated NICOM compared to thermo- dilution (TD) in several clinical settings.

Methods: 111 patients with a clinical indication for TD cardiac output (CO) measurement were recruited at five centers, including patients in cardiac catheterization laboratories, cardiac care units and intensive care units. CO measurements were made simulta- neously with TD and the bioreactance method and compared by regression analysis.

Results: For studies in the intensive care units, TD-based CO and NICOM were highly correlated (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) and did not differ significantly from each other (P = 0.55). Results in the cardiac catheterization laboratory were similar (r = 0.71, P < 0.001; P = 0.28 NICOM versus TD). In subsets of patients, NICOM was shown to be better corre- lated with TD-CO than CO obtained with the Fick method or with standard bioimpedance-based measurements of CO.

Conclusions: On average, compared to TD, bioreactance- based NICOM has acceptable accuracy in challenging clinical environments. Availability of such a tool may allow clinicians to have information about CO in patients where this information is not currently available to help diagnosis and guide therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物阻抗技术在无创心输出量测量中的多中心评价。
目的:生物电抗,即经胸电压响应于高频经胸电流时心跳内相位变化的分析,最近被引入无创心输出量测量(NICOM)。我们在几个临床环境中比较了NICOM和热稀释(TD)。方法:在心导管实验室、心内科和重症监护病房等5个中心招募有TD心输出量(CO)测量临床指征的患者111例。用TD法和生物电抗法同时测定CO,并进行回归分析比较。结果:在重症监护病房的研究中,TD-based CO与NICOM高度相关(r = 0.78, P < 0.0001),彼此间无显著差异(P = 0.55)。心导管化验室结果相似(r = 0.71, P < 0.001;P = 0.28 NICOM vs TD)。在患者亚群中,NICOM与TD-CO的相关性优于Fick法或基于标准生物阻抗的CO测量结果。结论:平均而言,与TD相比,基于生物阻抗的NICOM在具有挑战性的临床环境中具有可接受的准确性。这种工具的可用性可以使临床医生获得有关CO患者的信息,这些信息目前还无法帮助诊断和指导治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
A Cohort, Semi-Randomized, open label quality improvement patient blood management (PBM) comparison of point of care viscoelastic coagulation monitors in cardiac surgery. Clinical validation of a novel accelerometer-based respiratory rate monitor. Heart rate variability as a marker of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in deeply sedated, prepubescent patients: a secondary analysis. Optic nerve sheath diameter as a real-time biomarker for epidural blood patch efficacy after post-dural puncture headache: a preliminary report. From promising prototypes to "instructions for use": embedding LLMs safely in perioperative and intensive care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1