Response pattern asymmetry of binocular vision vertical fusion amplitudes in a normal population.

Janet K Kim, Ashley M Hayden, Elvio A Sadun, J Sebag, Alfredo A Sadun
{"title":"Response pattern asymmetry of binocular vision vertical fusion amplitudes in a normal population.","authors":"Janet K Kim,&nbsp;Ashley M Hayden,&nbsp;Elvio A Sadun,&nbsp;J Sebag,&nbsp;Alfredo A Sadun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the maximum vertical fusion amplitudes in vertical directions (response pattern by respective higher eye), to investigate for possible asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) was measured in one hundred normal adults with normal single binocular vision using a computer based device that produced a gradually increasing, but optically distant test distance, Vertical fusion amplitudes in the vertical left- over-right (L/R, elevation of the left eye above the right eye) pattern direction were compared to the vertical fusion amplitudes in the vertical right-over-left direction pattern(R/L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean VFA was 4.08 +/-1.01 prism diopters, with vertical fusion amplitudes of 4.40 +/-1.44 prism diopters in the L/R direction and 3.75 +/-1.19 prism diopters in the R/L direction. There was no association between ocular dominance and the direction of greater VFA. Asymmetry in the vertical fusion response was found, with 77/100 subjects showing greater than a 10% difference between the means of the L/R and R/L measurements. The group with asymmetry had 17% greater mean VFA than the symmetric group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normal adults frequently have asymmetric directional vertical fusion amplitudes. The asymmetry appears to be due to the contribution of the direction with the greater VFA, rather than the result of both alternatives. These results are intriguing and bear further investigation. Possible explanations my be asymmetry of orbital anatomy or functional asymmetry of either muscular or neuronal origin. They do not appear to be due to the relative ocular dominance. Inherent VFA asymmetry should therefore be considered in all forms of vergence testing in the vertical direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":79564,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the maximum vertical fusion amplitudes in vertical directions (response pattern by respective higher eye), to investigate for possible asymmetry.

Methods: Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) was measured in one hundred normal adults with normal single binocular vision using a computer based device that produced a gradually increasing, but optically distant test distance, Vertical fusion amplitudes in the vertical left- over-right (L/R, elevation of the left eye above the right eye) pattern direction were compared to the vertical fusion amplitudes in the vertical right-over-left direction pattern(R/L).

Results: The mean VFA was 4.08 +/-1.01 prism diopters, with vertical fusion amplitudes of 4.40 +/-1.44 prism diopters in the L/R direction and 3.75 +/-1.19 prism diopters in the R/L direction. There was no association between ocular dominance and the direction of greater VFA. Asymmetry in the vertical fusion response was found, with 77/100 subjects showing greater than a 10% difference between the means of the L/R and R/L measurements. The group with asymmetry had 17% greater mean VFA than the symmetric group.

Conclusion: Normal adults frequently have asymmetric directional vertical fusion amplitudes. The asymmetry appears to be due to the contribution of the direction with the greater VFA, rather than the result of both alternatives. These results are intriguing and bear further investigation. Possible explanations my be asymmetry of orbital anatomy or functional asymmetry of either muscular or neuronal origin. They do not appear to be due to the relative ocular dominance. Inherent VFA asymmetry should therefore be considered in all forms of vergence testing in the vertical direction.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常人双眼视觉垂直融合振幅的反应模式不对称性。
目的:比较垂直方向上的最大垂直融合振幅(各自高眼的反应模式),探讨可能存在的不对称。方法:对100例正常成人单目视觉进行垂直融合振幅(VFA)测量,测量距离逐渐增大,但视距较远,比较左眼高于右眼垂直方向(L/R)和右眼高于右眼垂直方向(R/L)的垂直融合振幅。结果:平均VFA为4.08 +/-1.01棱镜屈光度,L/R方向垂直融合振幅为4.40 +/-1.44棱镜屈光度,R/L方向垂直融合振幅为3.75 +/-1.19棱镜屈光度。眼优势与大VFA方向无关联。发现垂直融合反应不对称,有77/100的受试者在L/R和R/L测量值的平均值之间存在大于10%的差异。不对称组的平均VFA比对称组高17%。结论:正常成人经常出现不对称的定向垂直融合振幅。不对称似乎是由于方向的贡献与更大的VFA,而不是两种选择的结果。这些结果很有趣,值得进一步研究。可能的解释是眼眶解剖结构的不对称或肌肉或神经来源的功能不对称。它们似乎不是由于相对的眼优势。因此,在垂直方向的所有形式的辐散测试中都应考虑固有的VFA不对称性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five simple rules for treating pediatric intermitttent exotropia strabismus. Future of medicine and the profession; universal serotonin addiction? exotropia five rules; safer strabismus surgery; pinealoma; MS Corectopia. A new modfied anchored suspension-recession (so-called "hang-back" technique for high risk strabismus surgery. Isolated inferior rectus paresis with falling eye phenomenon of the contralateral eye in a patient with pineal tumor: a case report. Incidental detection of bilateral corectopia by photo screening leads to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1