Utility of monitoring mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplant patients.

Mark Oremus, Johannes Zeidler, Mary H H Ensom, Mina Matsuda-Abedini, Cynthia Balion, Lynda Booker, Carolyn Archer, Parminder Raina
{"title":"Utility of monitoring mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplant patients.","authors":"Mark Oremus,&nbsp;Johannes Zeidler,&nbsp;Mary H H Ensom,&nbsp;Mina Matsuda-Abedini,&nbsp;Cynthia Balion,&nbsp;Lynda Booker,&nbsp;Carolyn Archer,&nbsp;Parminder Raina","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether monitoring concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the serum or plasma of persons who receive a solid organ transplant will result in a lower incidence of transplant rejections and adverse events versus no monitoring of MPA. To investigate whether the incidence of rejection or adverse events differs according to MPA dose or frequency, type of MPA, the form of MPA monitored, the method of MPA monitoring, or sample characteristics. To assess whether monitoring is cost-effective versus no monitoring.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The following databases were searched from their dates of inception (in brackets) until October 2007: MEDLINE (1966); BIOSIS Previews (1976); EMBASE (1980); Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1995); and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1995).</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Studies identified from the data sources went through two levels of screening (i.e., title and abstract, full text) and the ones that passed were abstracted. Criteria for abstraction included publication in the English language, study design (i.e., randomized controlled trial [RCT], observational study with comparison group, case series), and patient receipt of allograft solid organ transplant. Additionally, any form of MPA had to be measured at least once in the plasma or serum using any method of measurement (e.g., AUC0-12, C0). Furthermore, these measures had to be linked to a health outcome (e.g., transplant rejection). Certain biomarkers (e.g., serum creatinine, glomular filtration rate) and all adverse events were also considered health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The published evidence on MPA monitoring is inconclusive. Direct, head-to-head comparison of monitoring versus no monitoring is limited to one RCT in adult, kidney transplant patients. Inferences about monitoring can be made from some observational studies, although the evidence is equivocal for MPA dose and dose frequency, nonexistent for type of MPA, inconclusive for form of MPA monitored or method of monitoring, and nonexistent for cost-effectiveness. Some studies suggest gender and concomitant use of calcineurin inhibitors will affect pharmacokinetic parameters, but the impact of these findings has not been assessed in relation to monitoring versus no monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The state of knowledge about therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA in solid organ transplants is still in its infancy. Until there is more evidence on the utility of routine MPA monitoring in solid organ transplant recipients, patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders (e.g., public and private insurers) will have to decide on a case by case basis whether the possible but uncertain benefits are worth the extra time and expense of monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 164","pages":"1-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether monitoring concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the serum or plasma of persons who receive a solid organ transplant will result in a lower incidence of transplant rejections and adverse events versus no monitoring of MPA. To investigate whether the incidence of rejection or adverse events differs according to MPA dose or frequency, type of MPA, the form of MPA monitored, the method of MPA monitoring, or sample characteristics. To assess whether monitoring is cost-effective versus no monitoring.

Data sources: The following databases were searched from their dates of inception (in brackets) until October 2007: MEDLINE (1966); BIOSIS Previews (1976); EMBASE (1980); Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1995); and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1995).

Review methods: Studies identified from the data sources went through two levels of screening (i.e., title and abstract, full text) and the ones that passed were abstracted. Criteria for abstraction included publication in the English language, study design (i.e., randomized controlled trial [RCT], observational study with comparison group, case series), and patient receipt of allograft solid organ transplant. Additionally, any form of MPA had to be measured at least once in the plasma or serum using any method of measurement (e.g., AUC0-12, C0). Furthermore, these measures had to be linked to a health outcome (e.g., transplant rejection). Certain biomarkers (e.g., serum creatinine, glomular filtration rate) and all adverse events were also considered health outcomes.

Results: The published evidence on MPA monitoring is inconclusive. Direct, head-to-head comparison of monitoring versus no monitoring is limited to one RCT in adult, kidney transplant patients. Inferences about monitoring can be made from some observational studies, although the evidence is equivocal for MPA dose and dose frequency, nonexistent for type of MPA, inconclusive for form of MPA monitored or method of monitoring, and nonexistent for cost-effectiveness. Some studies suggest gender and concomitant use of calcineurin inhibitors will affect pharmacokinetic parameters, but the impact of these findings has not been assessed in relation to monitoring versus no monitoring.

Conclusions: The state of knowledge about therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA in solid organ transplants is still in its infancy. Until there is more evidence on the utility of routine MPA monitoring in solid organ transplant recipients, patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders (e.g., public and private insurers) will have to decide on a case by case basis whether the possible but uncertain benefits are worth the extra time and expense of monitoring.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实体器官移植患者霉酚酸监测的应用。
目的:研究监测接受实体器官移植患者血清或血浆中霉酚酸(MPA)的浓度与不监测MPA相比,是否会降低移植排斥反应和不良事件的发生率。探讨不良反应或排斥反应的发生率是否因MPA剂量或频率、MPA类型、MPA监测形式、MPA监测方法或样本特征的不同而不同。评估监测与不监测是否具有成本效益。数据来源:从数据库建立日期(括号内)至2007年10月检索以下数据库:MEDLINE (1966);BIOSIS预览(1976年);EMBASE (1980);Cochrane系统评价数据库(1995);和Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(1995)。审查方法:从数据源中确定的研究经过两个层次的筛选(即标题和摘要、全文),通过筛选的研究进行摘要。摘要标准包括英文出版物、研究设计(即随机对照试验[RCT]、对照组观察性研究、病例系列)和患者接受同种异体实体器官移植。此外,任何形式的MPA必须使用任何测量方法(例如AUC0-12, C0)在血浆或血清中至少测量一次。此外,这些措施必须与健康结果(例如,移植排斥反应)联系起来。某些生物标志物(如血清肌酐、肾小球滤过率)和所有不良事件也被视为健康结果。结果:已发表的MPA监测证据尚无定论。监测与不监测的直接对比仅限于一项成人肾移植患者的随机对照试验。从一些观察性研究中可以得出关于监测的推断,尽管MPA剂量和剂量频率的证据是模棱两可的,MPA类型的证据是不存在的,MPA监测的形式或监测方法的证据是不确定的,并且没有成本效益的证据。一些研究表明,性别和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂的同时使用会影响药代动力学参数,但这些研究结果的影响尚未评估与监测和不监测相关的影响。结论:我国对实体器官移植中MPA治疗药物监测的认识尚处于起步阶段。在有更多证据表明常规MPA监测在实体器官移植受者中的效用之前,患者、临床医生和其他利益相关者(例如,公共和私人保险公司)将不得不根据具体情况决定是否值得花费额外的时间和费用进行监测,这些可能但不确定的益处是否值得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Maternal and Child Health: An Updated Systematic Review. Data Linkage Strategies to Advance Youth Suicide Prevention. Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Systematic Review. Health Information Exchange. Diagnosis and Treatment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1