Re-prioritizing doctoral education in health administration and policy.

Myron D Fottler
{"title":"Re-prioritizing doctoral education in health administration and policy.","authors":"Myron D Fottler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among health administration programs, doctoral education has been a low priority for decades. Programs which are profitable from an economic perspective tend to be maintained or expanded while less profitable programs tend to be reduced. For a variety of reasons, doctoral programs tend to be viewed as less profitable than other programs. This paper analyses why doctoral programs are a low priority, the symptoms of this low priority, implications for the future of health administration education, and recommendations for enhancing that future.</p>","PeriodicalId":75078,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of health administration education","volume":"24 3","pages":"201-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of health administration education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among health administration programs, doctoral education has been a low priority for decades. Programs which are profitable from an economic perspective tend to be maintained or expanded while less profitable programs tend to be reduced. For a variety of reasons, doctoral programs tend to be viewed as less profitable than other programs. This paper analyses why doctoral programs are a low priority, the symptoms of this low priority, implications for the future of health administration education, and recommendations for enhancing that future.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新确定卫生行政和政策方面博士教育的优先次序。
在卫生管理项目中,博士教育几十年来一直处于较低的优先级。从经济角度来看有利可图的项目往往会得到维持或扩大,而利润较低的项目往往会减少。由于种种原因,博士项目往往被认为比其他项目利润更低。本文分析了博士课程不受重视的原因、这种不受重视的症状、对未来卫生管理教育的影响,以及加强未来卫生管理教育的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work-life balance among health administration faculty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Student perceptions of a teaching electronic medical record in Health Administration education. Faculty salaries in health administration: trends and correlates 2015-2021. Supporting Health System Transformation: The development of an integrated interprofessional curriculum inclusive of public health students. WORKPLACE INCIVILITY EXPERIENCED BY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION FACULTY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1