Validation of the use of calibration factors between the iodine concentration and the computed tomography number measured outside the objects for estimation of iodine concentration inside the objects: phantom experiment.
{"title":"Validation of the use of calibration factors between the iodine concentration and the computed tomography number measured outside the objects for estimation of iodine concentration inside the objects: phantom experiment.","authors":"Kentaro Takanami, Shuichi Higano, Kei Takase, Tomohiro Kaneta, Takayuki Yamada, Hiroki Ishiya, Issei Mori, Shoki Takahashi","doi":"10.1007/s11604-007-0220-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate the use of a calibration factor measured outside the object for estimating the iodine concentration inside the object to improve the accuracy of the quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Several known concentrations (0, 6, 9, and 12 mg I/ml) of iodine contrast material (CM) samples were placed inside and outside cylindrical acrylic phantoms of two sizes and were imaged under various combinations of the tube voltages and currents (kV/mAs-80/200, 100/200, 120/200, 140/200) to obtain K factors. The K factors were compared between the phantoms and among the tube voltages. Each CM concentration was estimated from the CT number using the K factor measured outside the phantom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The K factors varied between the phantoms or among the tube voltages (P < 0.05). Although there were statistically significant variations in K factors among the different regions in a phantom, the mean variation coefficient was 3%-4%. The mean error of the estimated concentration was -5.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CM concentration should be accurately estimated at the region within a patient's body using the K factor measured at the surface of the body regardless of body size and tube voltage.</p>","PeriodicalId":49640,"journal":{"name":"Radiation medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"237-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11604-007-0220-9","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-007-0220-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to validate the use of a calibration factor measured outside the object for estimating the iodine concentration inside the object to improve the accuracy of the quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).
Materials and methods: Several known concentrations (0, 6, 9, and 12 mg I/ml) of iodine contrast material (CM) samples were placed inside and outside cylindrical acrylic phantoms of two sizes and were imaged under various combinations of the tube voltages and currents (kV/mAs-80/200, 100/200, 120/200, 140/200) to obtain K factors. The K factors were compared between the phantoms and among the tube voltages. Each CM concentration was estimated from the CT number using the K factor measured outside the phantom.
Results: The K factors varied between the phantoms or among the tube voltages (P < 0.05). Although there were statistically significant variations in K factors among the different regions in a phantom, the mean variation coefficient was 3%-4%. The mean error of the estimated concentration was -5.5%.
Conclusion: The CM concentration should be accurately estimated at the region within a patient's body using the K factor measured at the surface of the body regardless of body size and tube voltage.