M. de Sèze , A. Ruffion , F. Haab , E. Chartier-Kastler , P. Denys , X. Game , G. Karsenty , J. Kerdraon , B. Perrouin-Verbe , C. Saussine , J.-M. Soler , G. Amarenco
{"title":"Suivi des patients après injection de toxine botulique intradétrusorienne","authors":"M. de Sèze , A. Ruffion , F. Haab , E. Chartier-Kastler , P. Denys , X. Game , G. Karsenty , J. Kerdraon , B. Perrouin-Verbe , C. Saussine , J.-M. Soler , G. Amarenco","doi":"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Injections of botulinum toxin into the detrusor is a major evolution for treatment of neurogenic bladder. They are now considered as a treatment of choice, safe and efficient, in refractory neurogenic overactivity in catheterized patient. To date, there are no consensual practical guidelines for the follow-up of patients having been treated by intradetrusor botulinum toxin, whatever the indication of the treatment, functional, that is, for improving continence and overactive bladder syndrome or organic, that is, for treatment of high-detrusor pressure and their deleterious impact of urinary tract. This lack of guidelines leads to heterogeneity of treatment management and limit the definition of optimal modalities of intradetrusor botulinum toxin treatment in neurogenic patients. The aim of your work, prepared jointly with the International Francophone Neuro-Urological expert study group (GENULF), aimed at putting forward well-informed specific recommendations for the follow-up of patients having been treated by intradetrusor botulinum toxin for functional or organic indication of neurogenic detrusor overactivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72206,"journal":{"name":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 315-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.03.003","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168605408000652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Injections of botulinum toxin into the detrusor is a major evolution for treatment of neurogenic bladder. They are now considered as a treatment of choice, safe and efficient, in refractory neurogenic overactivity in catheterized patient. To date, there are no consensual practical guidelines for the follow-up of patients having been treated by intradetrusor botulinum toxin, whatever the indication of the treatment, functional, that is, for improving continence and overactive bladder syndrome or organic, that is, for treatment of high-detrusor pressure and their deleterious impact of urinary tract. This lack of guidelines leads to heterogeneity of treatment management and limit the definition of optimal modalities of intradetrusor botulinum toxin treatment in neurogenic patients. The aim of your work, prepared jointly with the International Francophone Neuro-Urological expert study group (GENULF), aimed at putting forward well-informed specific recommendations for the follow-up of patients having been treated by intradetrusor botulinum toxin for functional or organic indication of neurogenic detrusor overactivity.