Community and health facility influences on contraceptive method choice in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Rob Stephenson, Andy Beke, Delphin Tshibangu
{"title":"Community and health facility influences on contraceptive method choice in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.","authors":"Rob Stephenson,&nbsp;Andy Beke,&nbsp;Delphin Tshibangu","doi":"10.1363/ifpp.34.062.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although a growing number of studies have examined how community factors influence contraceptive use, few have explored how such factors affect method choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 1998 South Africa Demographic and Health Survey and the 1998 Eastern Cape Facility Survey were used to examine community and health facility influences on the method choices of 1,165 women aged 15-49 who lived in the Eastern Cape. Relative risk ratios from multilevel multinomial models assessed how method choice varied between communities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The likelihood of using the pill or a more permanent method rather than the injection rose with the proportion of women in a community who controlled their earnings (risk ratios, 3.2 and 3.8, respectively). In communities with higher proportions of females with only a primary education, women were less likely to use the pill instead of the injection (0.1). Higher doctor staffing levels were associated with a greater likelihood of using the pill or a more permanent method (1.5 and 1.4), and having more expired methods in stock was associated with increased use of a more permanent method (2.1). Several facility factors were associated with a decreased likelihood of using the pill rather than the injection: higher numbers of community health workers in an area and higher numbers of facility nurses who had received training on HIV/AIDS in the last year (0.9 for each). Yet a substantial amount of variation in method choice was not accounted for by these variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research should emphasize the collection of community-level data on structural, behavioral and cultural factors to help explain the variation in method choice between communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":81537,"journal":{"name":"International family planning perspectives","volume":"34 2","pages":"62-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.34.062.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Context: Although a growing number of studies have examined how community factors influence contraceptive use, few have explored how such factors affect method choice.

Methods: Data from the 1998 South Africa Demographic and Health Survey and the 1998 Eastern Cape Facility Survey were used to examine community and health facility influences on the method choices of 1,165 women aged 15-49 who lived in the Eastern Cape. Relative risk ratios from multilevel multinomial models assessed how method choice varied between communities.

Results: The likelihood of using the pill or a more permanent method rather than the injection rose with the proportion of women in a community who controlled their earnings (risk ratios, 3.2 and 3.8, respectively). In communities with higher proportions of females with only a primary education, women were less likely to use the pill instead of the injection (0.1). Higher doctor staffing levels were associated with a greater likelihood of using the pill or a more permanent method (1.5 and 1.4), and having more expired methods in stock was associated with increased use of a more permanent method (2.1). Several facility factors were associated with a decreased likelihood of using the pill rather than the injection: higher numbers of community health workers in an area and higher numbers of facility nurses who had received training on HIV/AIDS in the last year (0.9 for each). Yet a substantial amount of variation in method choice was not accounted for by these variables.

Conclusion: Future research should emphasize the collection of community-level data on structural, behavioral and cultural factors to help explain the variation in method choice between communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区和卫生设施对南非东开普省避孕方法选择的影响。
背景:虽然越来越多的研究调查了社区因素如何影响避孕药具的使用,但很少有研究探讨这些因素如何影响避孕方法的选择。方法:利用1998年南非人口与健康调查和1998年东开普省设施调查的数据,检查社区和卫生设施对居住在东开普省的1,165名15-49岁妇女选择方法的影响。多层多项模型的相对风险比评估了不同社区之间方法选择的差异。结果:在一个控制收入的社区中,使用避孕药或更持久的方法而不是注射的可能性随着女性比例的增加而增加(风险比分别为3.2和3.8)。在女性只受过初等教育的比例较高的社区,女性不太可能使用避孕药而不是注射(0.1%)。较高的医生人员配备水平与使用避孕药或更持久的方法的可能性更大相关(1.5和1.4),库存过期方法较多与更持久方法的使用增加相关(2.1)。一些设施因素与使用药丸而不是注射的可能性降低有关:一个地区社区卫生工作者人数较多,去年接受过艾滋病毒/艾滋病培训的设施护士人数较多(每人0.9人)。然而,这些变量并不能解释方法选择的大量变化。结论:未来的研究应强调收集社区层面的数据,包括结构、行为和文化因素,以帮助解释不同社区在方法选择上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Danlou Tablet May Alleviate Vascular Injury Caused by Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia through Regulating FIH-1, HIF-1, and Angptl4. An Update to the Pilot Study of 177Lu-PSMA in Low Volume Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Psychometric properties of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (KKaPsy). The role of social support and parity on contraceptive use in Cambodia Early coital debut and associated HIV risk factors among young women and men in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1