Costs and effects of prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome and neural tube defects.

Community genetics Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-08-05 DOI:10.1159/000133308
Mirjam Hoogendoorn, Silvia M A A Evers, Peter C J I Schielen, Marianne L L van Genugten, G Ardine de Wit, André J H A Ament
{"title":"Costs and effects of prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome and neural tube defects.","authors":"Mirjam Hoogendoorn,&nbsp;Silvia M A A Evers,&nbsp;Peter C J I Schielen,&nbsp;Marianne L L van Genugten,&nbsp;G Ardine de Wit,&nbsp;André J H A Ament","doi":"10.1159/000133308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome and neural tube defects (NTD) with regard to costs per detected case and the number of screening-related miscarriages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The screening methods compared were risk assessment tests, i.e. serum tests and nuchal translucency measurement (NT), and invasive testing through chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis. Costs, the number of cases detected and screening-related miscarriages were calculated using a decision tree model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The costs per detected case of Down syndrome ranged from EUR 98,000 for the first-trimester (serum) double test to EUR 191,000 for invasive testing. If NTD detection was included, the (serum) triple test had the lowest costs, EUR 73,000, per detected case of Down syndrome or NTD. The number of screening-related miscarriages due to invasive diagnostic tests varied from 13 per 100,000 women for the (serum) first- and second-trimester combined test to 914 per 100,000 women for invasive testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering screening for both Down syndrome and NTD favors the triple test in terms of costs per detected case. Compared to invasive testing, risk assessment tests in general substantially lower screening-related miscarriages, which raises the question of whether invasive testing should still be offered in a screening program for Down syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"11 6","pages":"359-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000133308","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000133308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome and neural tube defects (NTD) with regard to costs per detected case and the number of screening-related miscarriages.

Methods: The screening methods compared were risk assessment tests, i.e. serum tests and nuchal translucency measurement (NT), and invasive testing through chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis. Costs, the number of cases detected and screening-related miscarriages were calculated using a decision tree model.

Results: The costs per detected case of Down syndrome ranged from EUR 98,000 for the first-trimester (serum) double test to EUR 191,000 for invasive testing. If NTD detection was included, the (serum) triple test had the lowest costs, EUR 73,000, per detected case of Down syndrome or NTD. The number of screening-related miscarriages due to invasive diagnostic tests varied from 13 per 100,000 women for the (serum) first- and second-trimester combined test to 914 per 100,000 women for invasive testing.

Conclusions: Considering screening for both Down syndrome and NTD favors the triple test in terms of costs per detected case. Compared to invasive testing, risk assessment tests in general substantially lower screening-related miscarriages, which raises the question of whether invasive testing should still be offered in a screening program for Down syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唐氏综合症和神经管缺陷产前筛查方法的成本和效果。
目的:评价唐氏综合征和神经管缺陷(NTD)产前筛查方法的成本和筛查相关流产的数量。方法:比较两种筛查方法,一种是风险评估试验,即血清试验和颈部透光测量(NT);另一种是侵入性试验,即绒毛膜绒毛取样(CVS)或羊膜穿刺术。使用决策树模型计算成本、发现病例数和筛查相关流产。结果:每个唐氏综合征检测病例的费用从妊娠早期(血清)双重检测的98,000欧元到侵入性检测的191,000欧元不等。如果包括NTD检测,则(血清)三重检测的成本最低,为每例唐氏综合征或NTD检测病例73,000欧元。由于侵入性诊断测试导致的与筛查相关的流产数量从(血清)妊娠早期和中期联合测试的每10万名妇女中的13名到侵入性测试的每10万名妇女中的914名不等。结论:考虑同时筛查唐氏综合征和NTD,就每个检测病例的成本而言,三重检测更有利。与侵入性测试相比,风险评估测试通常大大降低了筛查相关的流产,这就提出了是否应该在唐氏综合征筛查项目中提供侵入性测试的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thalassaemia and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase screening in 13- to 14-year-old students of the Sardinian population: preliminary findings. Alpha-thalassaemia in association with beta-thalassaemia patients in Malaysia: a study on the co-inheritance of both disorders. Anxiety related to genetic testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and cystic fibrosis in COPD and/or bronchiectasis patients. Cytochrome p450 enzyme polymorphism frequency in indigenous and native american populations: a systematic review. Genetic heterogeneity in a susceptible region for essential hypertension among demographically different local populations in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1