Tent photoscreening and patched HOTV visual acuity by school nurses: validation of the ASD-ABCD protocol. (Anchorage School District- Alaska Blind Child Discovery program).

Robert W Arnold, Lee Stark, Rachel Leman, Koni K Arnold, M Diane Armitage
{"title":"Tent photoscreening and patched HOTV visual acuity by school nurses: validation of the ASD-ABCD protocol. (Anchorage School District- Alaska Blind Child Discovery program).","authors":"Robert W Arnold,&nbsp;Lee Stark,&nbsp;Rachel Leman,&nbsp;Koni K Arnold,&nbsp;M Diane Armitage","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Novel objective tests of risk factors for amblyopia offer an alternative for preschool vision screening. We compared the merits of photoscreening versus portable patched acuity testing in elementary schools. Photoscreening may outperform routine acuity testing in pediatric offices; however, both have fairly good validity when performed by specialists in preschool vision screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>School nurses performed patched HOTV surround acuity testing and two types of photoscreening (MTI and Gateway DV-S20) in a portable tent near each classroom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1700 children (696 1st grade, 710 Kindergarteners and 271 special-needs pre-Kindergarten). 14% had comprehensive exams and another 65% had normal photoscreens combined with patched acuities of 20/20 or better OU. We estimate the overall sensitivity/specificity using AAPOS guidelines for the modalities to be 39%:99% for patched HOTV acuity, 77%:99% for MTI photoscreening, and 85%:98% for Gateway photoscreening. The specificity of acuity testing was particularly low in pre-K due to 33% unable to complete the test, but about 80% of initial acuity failures were able to pass with pinhole.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tent photoscreening in younger elementary school children was more sensitive and faster than patched acuity particularly in developmentally delayed pre-K children.</p>","PeriodicalId":79564,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","volume":"23 2","pages":"83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Novel objective tests of risk factors for amblyopia offer an alternative for preschool vision screening. We compared the merits of photoscreening versus portable patched acuity testing in elementary schools. Photoscreening may outperform routine acuity testing in pediatric offices; however, both have fairly good validity when performed by specialists in preschool vision screening.

Methods: School nurses performed patched HOTV surround acuity testing and two types of photoscreening (MTI and Gateway DV-S20) in a portable tent near each classroom.

Results: 1700 children (696 1st grade, 710 Kindergarteners and 271 special-needs pre-Kindergarten). 14% had comprehensive exams and another 65% had normal photoscreens combined with patched acuities of 20/20 or better OU. We estimate the overall sensitivity/specificity using AAPOS guidelines for the modalities to be 39%:99% for patched HOTV acuity, 77%:99% for MTI photoscreening, and 85%:98% for Gateway photoscreening. The specificity of acuity testing was particularly low in pre-K due to 33% unable to complete the test, but about 80% of initial acuity failures were able to pass with pinhole.

Conclusion: Tent photoscreening in younger elementary school children was more sensitive and faster than patched acuity particularly in developmentally delayed pre-K children.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校护士帐篷摄影筛查和HOTV视力补丁:ASD-ABCD方案的验证。(安克雷奇学区-阿拉斯加盲童发现计划)。
背景:弱视危险因素的新客观测试为学龄前视力筛查提供了另一种选择。我们比较了光筛和便携式贴片视力测试在小学的优点。光筛检可能优于儿科诊所的常规视力测试;然而,当由专家进行学前视力筛查时,两者都有相当好的效度。方法:学校护士在每个教室附近的便携式帐篷内进行补片HOTV环绕视力测试和两种类型的光筛查(MTI和Gateway DV-S20)。结果:1700名儿童(一年级696名,幼儿园710名,特殊需要学前班271名)。14%的人进行了全面检查,另外65%的人有正常的光幕,并有20/20或更好的视力。根据AAPOS指南,我们估计这些方法的总体敏感性/特异性分别为39%:99%,MTI光筛为77%:99%,Gateway光筛为85%:98%。在学龄前,视力测试的特异性特别低,有33%的患者无法完成测试,但大约80%的初始视力失败患者能够通过针孔测试。结论:篷式光筛对低年级小学生的敏感性和灵敏性均高于修补视力,特别是对发育迟缓的学龄前儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five simple rules for treating pediatric intermitttent exotropia strabismus. Future of medicine and the profession; universal serotonin addiction? exotropia five rules; safer strabismus surgery; pinealoma; MS Corectopia. A new modfied anchored suspension-recession (so-called "hang-back" technique for high risk strabismus surgery. Isolated inferior rectus paresis with falling eye phenomenon of the contralateral eye in a patient with pineal tumor: a case report. Incidental detection of bilateral corectopia by photo screening leads to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1