Olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Rong-San Jiang, Fung-Jou Lu, Kai-Li Liang, Jiun-Yi Shiao, Mao-Chang Su, Chung-Han Hsin, Wen-Kang Chen
{"title":"Olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.","authors":"Rong-San Jiang,&nbsp;Fung-Jou Lu,&nbsp;Kai-Li Liang,&nbsp;Jiun-Yi Shiao,&nbsp;Mao-Chang Su,&nbsp;Chung-Han Hsin,&nbsp;Wen-Kang Chen","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The olfactory loss in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis has been measured by different methods. However, the results have been variable and it is not clear whether functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) significantly improves olfactory function. This study was performed to evaluate the influences of FESS on olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis using three different types of olfactory tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), a single staircase phenyl ethyl alcohol odor detection threshold test (STT), and a short-term odor memory/discrimination test a day before and 6 months after FESS. A questionnaire inquiring about the patients' self-perception of olfactory function was administered also. Independent ratings of the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis before FESS were established from CT scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two (74.3%) of the patients reported that their olfactory function was impaired before surgery, and 68.6% of the patients reported impaired olfactory function after surgery, a difference that was not significant. No meaningful changes in any of the olfactory test scores were noted 6 or more months after FESS. Preoperatively, small correlations between CT scores and the symptom scores (r = 0.278; p = 0.024), threshold scores (r = -0.27; p = 0.031), and UPSIT scores (r = -0.36; p = 0.003) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with severe rhinosinusitis, FESS had little impact on the ability to smell, regardless of the method for assessing smell function. Subtle associations between olfactory function and the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis determined by CT were observed, however, preoperatively. The olfactory test measures were correlated with one another both pre- and postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3195","citationCount":"74","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

Abstract

Background: The olfactory loss in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis has been measured by different methods. However, the results have been variable and it is not clear whether functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) significantly improves olfactory function. This study was performed to evaluate the influences of FESS on olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis using three different types of olfactory tests.

Methods: Seventy patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), a single staircase phenyl ethyl alcohol odor detection threshold test (STT), and a short-term odor memory/discrimination test a day before and 6 months after FESS. A questionnaire inquiring about the patients' self-perception of olfactory function was administered also. Independent ratings of the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis before FESS were established from CT scans.

Results: Fifty-two (74.3%) of the patients reported that their olfactory function was impaired before surgery, and 68.6% of the patients reported impaired olfactory function after surgery, a difference that was not significant. No meaningful changes in any of the olfactory test scores were noted 6 or more months after FESS. Preoperatively, small correlations between CT scores and the symptom scores (r = 0.278; p = 0.024), threshold scores (r = -0.27; p = 0.031), and UPSIT scores (r = -0.36; p = 0.003) were observed.

Conclusion: In patients with severe rhinosinusitis, FESS had little impact on the ability to smell, regardless of the method for assessing smell function. Subtle associations between olfactory function and the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis determined by CT were observed, however, preoperatively. The olfactory test measures were correlated with one another both pre- and postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻内窥镜手术前后嗅觉功能的变化。
背景:慢性鼻窦炎患者的嗅觉丧失已经通过不同的方法进行了测量。然而,结果是可变的,功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)是否能显著改善嗅觉功能尚不清楚。本研究通过三种不同类型的嗅觉测试来评估FESS对慢性鼻窦炎患者嗅觉功能的影响。方法:70例慢性鼻窦炎患者分别于FESS前1天和FESS后6个月进行宾夕法尼亚大学气味识别测试(UPSIT)、单楼梯苯乙醇气味检测阈值测试(STT)和短期气味记忆/辨别测试。同时对患者的嗅觉功能自我知觉进行问卷调查。通过CT扫描建立FESS前慢性鼻窦炎严重程度的独立评分。结果:52例(74.3%)患者报告术前嗅觉功能受损,68.6%患者报告术后嗅觉功能受损,差异无统计学意义。FESS 6个月或更长时间后,嗅觉测试分数没有明显变化。术前,CT评分与症状评分相关性较小(r = 0.278;P = 0.024),阈值评分(r = -0.27;p = 0.031), UPSIT评分(r = -0.36;P = 0.003)。结论:在重度鼻窦炎患者中,FESS对嗅觉能力的影响很小,无论评估嗅觉功能的方法如何。然而,术前观察到嗅觉功能与慢性鼻窦炎严重程度之间的微妙关联。嗅觉测试结果在术前和术后均具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. The effect of nasal surgery on snoring. Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1