Impact of body mass index and Framingham risk score on coronary artery plaque.

Osaka city medical journal Pub Date : 2008-06-01
Hiroaki Takeshita, Yoshihisa Shimada, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Hiroki Nishioka, Shoichi Ehara, Toru Kataoka, Minoru Yoshiyama
{"title":"Impact of body mass index and Framingham risk score on coronary artery plaque.","authors":"Hiroaki Takeshita,&nbsp;Yoshihisa Shimada,&nbsp;Yoshiki Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hiroki Nishioka,&nbsp;Shoichi Ehara,&nbsp;Toru Kataoka,&nbsp;Minoru Yoshiyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is still unclear whether traditional risk factors for heart disease and body weight correlate with the progression of left main coronary artery (LMCA) atherosclerosis. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cross-sectional relation between conventional risk score or metabolic disorder and non-stenotic LMCA atherosclerosis using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed procedural and demographic data from 217 consecutive patients undergoing intervention for a left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery lesion, including their cardiovascular risk (Framingham risk score) and degree of adiposity. IVUS measurements for subclinical LMCA plaque were obtained in all patients and compared to their risk score (low, intermediate or high risk [< or =10%, 10-20%, and > or =20%, respectively]), with volumetric IVUS analyses being performed for the entire LMCA. Patients were further stratified by body weight (normal vs overweight/obesity [body mass index > or =25 kg/m2]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Plaque volume index was greater in patients with high and intermediate risk groups compared to the low risk group (plaque volume index; 9.8 +/- 2.9 mm3/mm and 10.1 +/- 3.0 mm3/mm vs. 8.3 +/- 2.7 mm3/mm, p=0.017 and p=0.0002, respectively). Plaque volume index was also greater in patients in the overweight/obesity group compared to the normal weight group (plaque volume index; 10.2 +/- 2.9 mm3/mm vs 9.1 +/- 3.0 mm3/mm, p=0.005). Linear regression analysis identified overweight/obesity (p=0.034) and high 10-year CAD risk (p=0.003) as independent predictors of increased LMCA plaque volume index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conventional coronary risk factors, as well as adiposity itself, related to the volume of coronary plaque at non-stenotic LMCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19613,"journal":{"name":"Osaka city medical journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"31-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osaka city medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is still unclear whether traditional risk factors for heart disease and body weight correlate with the progression of left main coronary artery (LMCA) atherosclerosis. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cross-sectional relation between conventional risk score or metabolic disorder and non-stenotic LMCA atherosclerosis using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Methods: We analyzed procedural and demographic data from 217 consecutive patients undergoing intervention for a left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery lesion, including their cardiovascular risk (Framingham risk score) and degree of adiposity. IVUS measurements for subclinical LMCA plaque were obtained in all patients and compared to their risk score (low, intermediate or high risk [< or =10%, 10-20%, and > or =20%, respectively]), with volumetric IVUS analyses being performed for the entire LMCA. Patients were further stratified by body weight (normal vs overweight/obesity [body mass index > or =25 kg/m2]).

Results: Plaque volume index was greater in patients with high and intermediate risk groups compared to the low risk group (plaque volume index; 9.8 +/- 2.9 mm3/mm and 10.1 +/- 3.0 mm3/mm vs. 8.3 +/- 2.7 mm3/mm, p=0.017 and p=0.0002, respectively). Plaque volume index was also greater in patients in the overweight/obesity group compared to the normal weight group (plaque volume index; 10.2 +/- 2.9 mm3/mm vs 9.1 +/- 3.0 mm3/mm, p=0.005). Linear regression analysis identified overweight/obesity (p=0.034) and high 10-year CAD risk (p=0.003) as independent predictors of increased LMCA plaque volume index.

Conclusions: Conventional coronary risk factors, as well as adiposity itself, related to the volume of coronary plaque at non-stenotic LMCA.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重指数和Framingham风险评分对冠状动脉斑块的影响。
背景:目前尚不清楚心脏病的传统危险因素和体重是否与左主干冠状动脉粥样硬化的进展相关。因此,本研究的目的是利用血管内超声(IVUS)评估常规风险评分或代谢紊乱与非狭窄性LMCA动脉粥样硬化之间的横断面关系。方法:我们分析了217例连续接受左前降支或左旋冠状动脉病变干预的患者的手术和人口统计学数据,包括他们的心血管风险(Framingham风险评分)和肥胖程度。对所有患者的亚临床LMCA斑块进行IVUS测量,并与他们的风险评分(低、中、高风险[分别<或=10%、10-20%和>或=20%])进行比较,并对整个LMCA进行体积IVUS分析。患者进一步按体重分层(正常vs超重/肥胖[体重指数>或=25 kg/m2])。结果:与低危组相比,高危组和中危组患者的斑块体积指数更高(斑块体积指数;9.8 +/- 2.9 mm3/mm和10.1 +/- 3.0 mm3/mm vs. 8.3 +/- 2.7 mm3/mm, p=0.017和p=0.0002)。与正常体重组相比,超重/肥胖组患者的斑块体积指数也更高(斑块体积指数;10.2 + / - 2.9 mm3 /毫米和9.1 + / - 3.0 mm3 /毫米,p = 0.005)。线性回归分析发现,超重/肥胖(p=0.034)和10年CAD高风险(p=0.003)是LMCA斑块体积指数增加的独立预测因素。结论:传统的冠状动脉危险因素,以及肥胖本身,与非狭窄性LMCA冠状动脉斑块的体积有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Significance of Perioperative Blood Coagulation Factor XIII in Pulmonary Resections. Comparison of the Clinical Courses of Patients with Influenza after Neuraminidase Inhibitors Treatment: A Postcard Survey of the 2013-2014 Influenza Season in Osaka. Association of the Clinical Subtype and Etiology for Delirium with the Outcome after Risperidone Monotherapy in Patients Having Cancer. Effects of Night Shift Work on Nighttime Blood Pressure among Healthy Young Female Medical Workers. Cardio-ankle Vascular Index Associated with Coronary Plaque Burden not Plaque Morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1