Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures.

Ryan G Miyamoto, Kevin M Kaplan, Brett R Levine, Kenneth A Egol, Joseph D Zuckerman
{"title":"Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures.","authors":"Ryan G Miyamoto,&nbsp;Kevin M Kaplan,&nbsp;Brett R Levine,&nbsp;Kenneth A Egol,&nbsp;Joseph D Zuckerman","doi":"10.5435/00124635-200810000-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the past 10 years, there has been a worldwide effort in all medical fields to base clinical health care decisions on available evidence as described by thorough reviews of the literature. Hip fractures pose a significant health care problem worldwide, with an annual incidence of approximately 1.7 million. Globally, the mean age of the population is increasing, and the number of hip fractures is expected to triple in the next 50 years. One-year mortality rates currently range from 14% to 36%, and care for these patients represents a major global economic burden. Surgical options for the management of femoral neck fractures are closely linked to individual patient factors and to the location and degree of fracture displacement. Nonsurgical management of intracapsular hip fractures is limited. Based on a critical, evidence-based review of the current literature, we have found minimal differences between implants used for internal fixation of displaced fractures. Cemented, unipolar hemiarthroplasty remains a good option with reasonable results. In the appropriate patient population, outcomes following total hip arthroplasty are favorable and appear to be superior to those of internal fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"16 10","pages":"596-607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"237","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200810000-00005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 237

Abstract

During the past 10 years, there has been a worldwide effort in all medical fields to base clinical health care decisions on available evidence as described by thorough reviews of the literature. Hip fractures pose a significant health care problem worldwide, with an annual incidence of approximately 1.7 million. Globally, the mean age of the population is increasing, and the number of hip fractures is expected to triple in the next 50 years. One-year mortality rates currently range from 14% to 36%, and care for these patients represents a major global economic burden. Surgical options for the management of femoral neck fractures are closely linked to individual patient factors and to the location and degree of fracture displacement. Nonsurgical management of intracapsular hip fractures is limited. Based on a critical, evidence-based review of the current literature, we have found minimal differences between implants used for internal fixation of displaced fractures. Cemented, unipolar hemiarthroplasty remains a good option with reasonable results. In the appropriate patient population, outcomes following total hip arthroplasty are favorable and appear to be superior to those of internal fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋部骨折的外科治疗:基于证据的文献综述。1:股骨颈骨折。
在过去的10年里,世界范围内所有医学领域都在努力将临床卫生保健决策建立在现有证据的基础上,这些证据是通过对文献的全面回顾所描述的。髋部骨折是世界范围内的一个重大卫生保健问题,每年约有170万例。在全球范围内,人口的平均年龄正在增加,髋部骨折的数量预计在未来50年将增加两倍。目前一年死亡率在14%至36%之间,对这些患者的护理是全球经济的主要负担。股骨颈骨折的手术选择与患者的个体因素以及骨折移位的位置和程度密切相关。髋关节囊内骨折的非手术治疗是有限的。基于对现有文献的批判性、循证性回顾,我们发现用于移位骨折内固定的植入物之间的差异很小。骨水泥、单极半关节置换术仍然是一种效果合理的好选择。在适当的患者群体中,全髋关节置换术后的结果是有利的,似乎优于内固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
Increasing Body Mass Index Not Associated With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary THA or TKA. Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates in Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: Large, Propensity Score-Matched Patient Cohorts. Advances in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Glenoid Implant Design. Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now. The Power of Preference Signaling: A Monumental Shift in the Orthopaedic Surgery Application Process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1