The operation called Verstehen.

T ABEL
{"title":"The operation called Verstehen.","authors":"T ABEL","doi":"10.1086/220318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The postulate of Verstehen is the main argument of social theorists who assert the existence of a dichotomy between the physical and the social sciences. An analysis of the operation of Verstehen shows that it does not provide new knowledge and that it cannot be used as a means of verification. Lacking the fundamental attributes of scientific method, even though it does perform some auxiliary functions in research, the fact of Verstehen cannot be used to validate the assumption of a dichotomy of the sciences.","PeriodicalId":86247,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of sociology","volume":"54 3","pages":"211-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1948-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/220318","citationCount":"220","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/220318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 220

Abstract

The postulate of Verstehen is the main argument of social theorists who assert the existence of a dichotomy between the physical and the social sciences. An analysis of the operation of Verstehen shows that it does not provide new knowledge and that it cannot be used as a means of verification. Lacking the fundamental attributes of scientific method, even though it does perform some auxiliary functions in research, the fact of Verstehen cannot be used to validate the assumption of a dichotomy of the sciences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这个行动叫做Verstehen。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minority-group status and the fertility of black Americans, 1970: a new look. Marriage and fertility in postfamine Ireland: a multivariate analysis. Transvestites in the middle ages. A funny thing happened on the way to the orifice: women in gynecology textbooks. Problems in the collection of opinion-research data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1