The human side of automation: experience in clinical pharmacology.

J R Powell
{"title":"The human side of automation: experience in clinical pharmacology.","authors":"J R Powell","doi":"10.1155/S1463924695000162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A vision of automation presented by the media is that robots are inherently smarter than humans. Robots whirl around efficiently doing a complex, tedious task. A single human monitors and programs many robots and markedly increases productivity and quality, while many previously employed, error-prone employees collect their unemployment benefit. My experience of automation from an industrial clinical pharmacology department is quite different fiom this. In an environment where workload and complexity increase progressively in the face of a fixed human and financial resource, seeking efficiency through automation has been synonymous with success, if not survival. In addition to using robots to automate physical processes, we automate intbrmation with computers and standardize repetitive, labour intensive tasks with more efficient processes. Direct by-products of the increased productivity through automation are enhanced creativity and job satisfaction. The irony to me is that automation is by its nature, very human. Betbre can describe automation in my environment I have to explain the nature of our work and the challenges We face. In our drug development environment, clinical pharma-cology is the customer of preclinical development in pharmacology, toxicology, drug metabolism and pharma-ceutics. We work with drug discovery and preclinical development to provide a clear phase I target for patient type, human dosage range estimate and route of administration. Clinical pharmacology customers are the phase II/III and IV therapeutic groups in gastrointestinal, cardio-vascular, infectious, central nervous systems, cancer, and respiratory diseases. We provide these groups an early estimate for drug safety, therapeutic activity, and dosage recommendations. International coordination is required between clinical pharmacology groups The overall complexity and required speed of our work is further challenged by the current re-engineering targets to increase productivity several tbld and decrease our development and FDA drug approval times. I hope this background picture demonstrates the acute need for efficiency in planning, research execution, decision making and flexibility to recycle our resource as needs change. Automation is not an interesting experiment it is central to our success! Glaxo has been a rapidly growing company for the past 15 years. The current clinical pharmacology department had its origins when a bioanalytical group was formed 10 years ago to service clinical studies. Seven years ago, pharmacokineticists were hired to service new formulations being developed for UK discovery drugs. Three years ago our mission expanded to bring new chemical entities into human phase I studies. The mission is now to advance or stop …","PeriodicalId":22600,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Automatic Chemistry","volume":"17 3","pages":"95-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/S1463924695000162","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Automatic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/S1463924695000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A vision of automation presented by the media is that robots are inherently smarter than humans. Robots whirl around efficiently doing a complex, tedious task. A single human monitors and programs many robots and markedly increases productivity and quality, while many previously employed, error-prone employees collect their unemployment benefit. My experience of automation from an industrial clinical pharmacology department is quite different fiom this. In an environment where workload and complexity increase progressively in the face of a fixed human and financial resource, seeking efficiency through automation has been synonymous with success, if not survival. In addition to using robots to automate physical processes, we automate intbrmation with computers and standardize repetitive, labour intensive tasks with more efficient processes. Direct by-products of the increased productivity through automation are enhanced creativity and job satisfaction. The irony to me is that automation is by its nature, very human. Betbre can describe automation in my environment I have to explain the nature of our work and the challenges We face. In our drug development environment, clinical pharma-cology is the customer of preclinical development in pharmacology, toxicology, drug metabolism and pharma-ceutics. We work with drug discovery and preclinical development to provide a clear phase I target for patient type, human dosage range estimate and route of administration. Clinical pharmacology customers are the phase II/III and IV therapeutic groups in gastrointestinal, cardio-vascular, infectious, central nervous systems, cancer, and respiratory diseases. We provide these groups an early estimate for drug safety, therapeutic activity, and dosage recommendations. International coordination is required between clinical pharmacology groups The overall complexity and required speed of our work is further challenged by the current re-engineering targets to increase productivity several tbld and decrease our development and FDA drug approval times. I hope this background picture demonstrates the acute need for efficiency in planning, research execution, decision making and flexibility to recycle our resource as needs change. Automation is not an interesting experiment it is central to our success! Glaxo has been a rapidly growing company for the past 15 years. The current clinical pharmacology department had its origins when a bioanalytical group was formed 10 years ago to service clinical studies. Seven years ago, pharmacokineticists were hired to service new formulations being developed for UK discovery drugs. Three years ago our mission expanded to bring new chemical entities into human phase I studies. The mission is now to advance or stop …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动化的人的一面:临床药理学经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
product news From the editor's desk Product news Product News Meeting Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1