Joseph K Han, Robert J Caughey, Charlie W Gross, Steve Newman
{"title":"Management of retrobulbar hematoma.","authors":"Joseph K Han, Robert J Caughey, Charlie W Gross, Steve Newman","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrobulbar hematoma (RH) is a complication that can result from both otolaryngic and ophthalmologic procedures. RH can occur during endoscopic sinus surgery and improper treatment can result in several morbidities, including visual loss. Despite serious consequences, management for RH is not well evaluated. However, lateral canthotomy with cantholysis is generally recommended. The objective of this study is to review the management for RH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed at our tertiary hospital from 1979 to 2006 for patients with the ICD-9 code for orbital hematoma. The demographic information, comorbidities, presentation, management, follow-up period, and outcomes were evaluated. Data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were identified with 13 male patients and an average age of 43 years (range, 11-80 years). The RH was broken into three categories: iatrogenic, six cases; trauma, eight cases; and spontaneous, eight cases. The most common symptom was diplopia followed by orbital pain. The average pretreatment and posttreatment tonometric pressures were 25.3 mm Hg (range, 11-60 mm Hg) and 14.5 mm Hg (range, 10-22 mm Hg), respectively. The average proptosis was 4.3 (range: 0-8) mm. Treatments were observation (13 cases), medical treatment alone (4 cases), and surgical treatment with and without medical treatment (5 cases). Sixty-eight percent of the patient's visual acuity improved with these treatments. Twenty-seven percent had no visual changes from the RH. The average follow-up was 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Traditionally, lateral canthotomy with cantholysis is recommended for the treatment for RH. However, in certain patients and settings, there may be an acceptable alternative option for the management of RH.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3217","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Abstract
Background: Retrobulbar hematoma (RH) is a complication that can result from both otolaryngic and ophthalmologic procedures. RH can occur during endoscopic sinus surgery and improper treatment can result in several morbidities, including visual loss. Despite serious consequences, management for RH is not well evaluated. However, lateral canthotomy with cantholysis is generally recommended. The objective of this study is to review the management for RH.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed at our tertiary hospital from 1979 to 2006 for patients with the ICD-9 code for orbital hematoma. The demographic information, comorbidities, presentation, management, follow-up period, and outcomes were evaluated. Data were analyzed.
Results: Twenty-two patients were identified with 13 male patients and an average age of 43 years (range, 11-80 years). The RH was broken into three categories: iatrogenic, six cases; trauma, eight cases; and spontaneous, eight cases. The most common symptom was diplopia followed by orbital pain. The average pretreatment and posttreatment tonometric pressures were 25.3 mm Hg (range, 11-60 mm Hg) and 14.5 mm Hg (range, 10-22 mm Hg), respectively. The average proptosis was 4.3 (range: 0-8) mm. Treatments were observation (13 cases), medical treatment alone (4 cases), and surgical treatment with and without medical treatment (5 cases). Sixty-eight percent of the patient's visual acuity improved with these treatments. Twenty-seven percent had no visual changes from the RH. The average follow-up was 5 years.
Conclusion: Traditionally, lateral canthotomy with cantholysis is recommended for the treatment for RH. However, in certain patients and settings, there may be an acceptable alternative option for the management of RH.
背景:球后血肿(RH)是耳鼻喉科和眼科手术均可导致的并发症。RH可在内窥镜鼻窦手术中发生,治疗不当可导致多种并发症,包括视力丧失。尽管后果严重,但RH的管理没有得到很好的评估。然而,通常推荐侧眦切开术加眦松解术。本研究的目的是回顾RH的管理。方法:对1979 ~ 2006年在我院三级医院就诊的眼眶血肿患者进行回顾性分析。评估了人口统计信息、合并症、表现、管理、随访期和结果。对数据进行分析。结果:22例患者,男性13例,平均年龄43岁(范围11 ~ 80岁)。RH分为三类:医源性6例;创伤8例;自发的,8例。最常见的症状是复视,其次是眼窝疼痛。治疗前和治疗后的平均血压计分别为25.3 mm Hg(范围11-60 mm Hg)和14.5 mm Hg(范围10-22 mm Hg)。平均预后4.3 mm(范围:0 ~ 8 mm)。治疗方法为观察(13例)、单纯药物治疗(4例)、手术治疗(5例)。通过这些治疗,68%的患者的视力得到了改善。27%的人没有RH引起的视觉变化。平均随访时间为5年。结论:传统上,推荐侧眦切开术加眦松解术治疗RH。然而,在某些患者和环境中,可能存在可接受的RH管理替代方案。