Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in the normal nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.

Guan-xia Xiong, Jie-Min Zhan, Hong-Yan Jiang, Jian-Feng Li, Liang-Wan Rong, Geng Xu, Gen Xu
{"title":"Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in the normal nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.","authors":"Guan-xia Xiong,&nbsp;Jie-Min Zhan,&nbsp;Hong-Yan Jiang,&nbsp;Jian-Feng Li,&nbsp;Liang-Wan Rong,&nbsp;Geng Xu,&nbsp;Gen Xu","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate airflow velocity, trace, distribution, and air pressure, as well as the airflow exchange between the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus in a normal subject using computational fluid dynamics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fluent software is used to simulate nasal cavity and paranasal sinus structure after CT scanning of a normal adult subject. Airflow velocity, pressure, distribution, and trace lines were calculated by Navier-Stokes equation and numerically visualized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Airflow in the common and middle meatus accounted for >50 and 30% of total nasal cavity flow. Flow velocity was maximal in the common meatus, followed by the middle meatus. Flow velocity and flux in each paranasal sinus was extremely low. The flow trace in the inferior and lower part of the common meatus was predominately straight in form. Flow was parabolic in the middle and superior meatus and the middle and upper parts of the common meatus. Air pressure was high at the front end of the inferior and middle turbinate and the uncinate process. There was little pressure difference/flow exchange between inner and outer aspects of the paranasal sinus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The major airflow forms are straight (lower common and inferior meatus) and parabolic (middle and upper common meatus and middle superior). Flow force is strongest at the front end of the inferior and middle turbinate and uncinate process. There is very little exchange between the paranasal sinus and the nasal cavity during stable airflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":"22 5","pages":"477-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3211","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate airflow velocity, trace, distribution, and air pressure, as well as the airflow exchange between the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus in a normal subject using computational fluid dynamics.

Methods: Fluent software is used to simulate nasal cavity and paranasal sinus structure after CT scanning of a normal adult subject. Airflow velocity, pressure, distribution, and trace lines were calculated by Navier-Stokes equation and numerically visualized.

Results: Airflow in the common and middle meatus accounted for >50 and 30% of total nasal cavity flow. Flow velocity was maximal in the common meatus, followed by the middle meatus. Flow velocity and flux in each paranasal sinus was extremely low. The flow trace in the inferior and lower part of the common meatus was predominately straight in form. Flow was parabolic in the middle and superior meatus and the middle and upper parts of the common meatus. Air pressure was high at the front end of the inferior and middle turbinate and the uncinate process. There was little pressure difference/flow exchange between inner and outer aspects of the paranasal sinus.

Conclusion: The major airflow forms are straight (lower common and inferior meatus) and parabolic (middle and upper common meatus and middle superior). Flow force is strongest at the front end of the inferior and middle turbinate and uncinate process. There is very little exchange between the paranasal sinus and the nasal cavity during stable airflow.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常鼻腔和鼻窦内气流的计算流体动力学模拟。
背景:本研究旨在利用计算流体力学的方法研究正常受试者鼻腔与鼻窦之间的气流速度、气流轨迹、气流分布、气压以及气流交换。方法:使用Fluent软件模拟正常成人CT扫描后的鼻腔和副鼻窦结构。用Navier-Stokes方程计算了气流的速度、压力、分布和轨迹线,并进行了数值可视化。结果:鼻腔中、共道气流分别占鼻腔总气流的50%和30%以上。普通通道流速最大,中间通道次之。各副鼻窦血流速度及流量极低。下下半段和下半段的血流轨迹以直型为主。中上肌及共肌中上部呈抛物线状血流。下鼻甲、中鼻甲前端及钩状突气压高。副鼻窦内外侧的压力差/流量交换很小。结论:主要气流形式为直流型(下共径和下径)和抛物线型(中、上共径和中上径)。下鼻甲前端、中鼻甲前端及钩状突处流力最强。在气流稳定时,鼻窦和鼻腔之间的交换很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. The effect of nasal surgery on snoring. Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1