Does nasal irrigation enter paranasal sinuses in chronic rhinosinusitis?

Kornkiat Snidvongs, Pattraporn Chaowanapanja, Songklot Aeumjaturapat, Supinda Chusakul, Puangmali Praweswararat
{"title":"Does nasal irrigation enter paranasal sinuses in chronic rhinosinusitis?","authors":"Kornkiat Snidvongs,&nbsp;Pattraporn Chaowanapanja,&nbsp;Songklot Aeumjaturapat,&nbsp;Supinda Chusakul,&nbsp;Puangmali Praweswararat","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal irrigation is widely used in treating sinonasal diseases. Not only does it remove static secretions and promote mucociliary clearance, but, in chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal flush is also a potential route for topical drug administration into paranasal sinuses. A clinical study was conducted to investigate how well nasal irrigation could reach paranasal sinuses with the ostiomeatal units blocked in chronic rhinosinusitis. This study was performed to (1) assess the ability of a nasal douche and spray to deliver a solution into the paranasal sinuses in chronic rhinosinusitis and (2) compare the performance of the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen patients, with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis, underwent nasal irrigation with 140 mg/mL of iodinated contrast solution by 40 mL of douching using an irrigation syringe in one side, and 10 mL of spraying in the other side. A computed tomography scan was undertaken for each patient to determine the volume and the distribution of staining in the nose and paranasal sinuses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only two patients had any staining, with a small amount present in a total of three maxillary sinuses (0.10 mL, 0.04 mL, and 0.13 mL). The mean volumes of paranasal sinus staining by nasal douche and nasal spray were 0.0093 and 0.01 mL, respectively. We found that the two techniques had a similar performance. Both of them delivered only a small amount of the solution, if any, into the sinuses (with a mean difference of -0.0007 mL; 95% CI, -0.02-0.02 mL; p = 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nasal douche and spray is not effective in delivering a nasal irrigation solution into paranasal sinuses in chronic rhinosinusitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3221","citationCount":"75","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

Abstract

Background: Nasal irrigation is widely used in treating sinonasal diseases. Not only does it remove static secretions and promote mucociliary clearance, but, in chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal flush is also a potential route for topical drug administration into paranasal sinuses. A clinical study was conducted to investigate how well nasal irrigation could reach paranasal sinuses with the ostiomeatal units blocked in chronic rhinosinusitis. This study was performed to (1) assess the ability of a nasal douche and spray to deliver a solution into the paranasal sinuses in chronic rhinosinusitis and (2) compare the performance of the two techniques.

Methods: Fourteen patients, with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis, underwent nasal irrigation with 140 mg/mL of iodinated contrast solution by 40 mL of douching using an irrigation syringe in one side, and 10 mL of spraying in the other side. A computed tomography scan was undertaken for each patient to determine the volume and the distribution of staining in the nose and paranasal sinuses.

Results: Only two patients had any staining, with a small amount present in a total of three maxillary sinuses (0.10 mL, 0.04 mL, and 0.13 mL). The mean volumes of paranasal sinus staining by nasal douche and nasal spray were 0.0093 and 0.01 mL, respectively. We found that the two techniques had a similar performance. Both of them delivered only a small amount of the solution, if any, into the sinuses (with a mean difference of -0.0007 mL; 95% CI, -0.02-0.02 mL; p = 0.94).

Conclusion: Nasal douche and spray is not effective in delivering a nasal irrigation solution into paranasal sinuses in chronic rhinosinusitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻腔冲洗是否进入鼻窦?
背景:鼻冲洗在鼻窦疾病治疗中应用广泛。它不仅可以清除静态分泌物,促进粘膜纤毛清除,而且在慢性鼻窦炎中,鼻腔冲洗也是局部给药进入鼻窦的潜在途径。我们进行了一项临床研究,探讨在慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻窦口部阻塞时,鼻腔冲洗对鼻窦的影响。本研究的目的是:(1)评估鼻腔灌洗和喷雾剂在慢性鼻窦炎中向鼻窦输送溶液的能力;(2)比较两种技术的性能。方法:双侧慢性鼻窦炎患者14例,用碘造影剂140 mg/mL鼻腔冲洗,一侧用冲洗注射器冲洗40 mL,另一侧喷淋10 mL。对每位患者进行计算机断层扫描,以确定鼻和鼻窦染色的体积和分布。结果:仅有2例患者有染色,在3个上颌窦(0.10 mL、0.04 mL和0.13 mL)中均有少量染色。鼻灌洗和鼻喷雾剂鼻窦染色平均体积分别为0.0093和0.01 mL。我们发现这两种技术具有相似的性能。他们都只将少量的溶液(如果有的话)送入鼻窦(平均差值为-0.0007 mL;95% CI, -0.02-0.02 mL;P = 0.94)。结论:鼻灌洗和鼻喷雾剂对慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻窦灌洗效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. The effect of nasal surgery on snoring. Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1