Word of mouth and physician referrals still drive health care provider choice.

Research brief Pub Date : 2008-12-01
Ha T Tu, Johanna R Lauer
{"title":"Word of mouth and physician referrals still drive health care provider choice.","authors":"Ha T Tu,&nbsp;Johanna R Lauer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sponsors of health care price and quality transparency initiatives often identify all consumers as their target audiences, but the true audiences for these programs are much more limited. In 2007, only 11 percent of American adults looked for a new primary care physician, 28 percent needed a new specialist physician and 16 percent underwent a medical procedure at a new facility, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). Among consumers who found a new provider, few engaged in active shopping or considered price or quality information--especially when choosing specialists or facilities for medical procedures. When selecting new primary care physicians, half of all consumers relied on word-of-mouth recommendations from friends and relatives, but many also used doctor recommendations (38%) and health plan information (35%), and nearly two in five used multiple information sources when choosing a primary care physician. However, when choosing specialists and facilities for medical procedures, most consumers relied exclusively on physician referrals. Use of online provider information was low, ranging from 3 percent for consumers undergoing procedures to 7 percent for consumers choosing new specialists to 11 percent for consumers choosing new primary care physicians</p>","PeriodicalId":87738,"journal":{"name":"Research brief","volume":" 9","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sponsors of health care price and quality transparency initiatives often identify all consumers as their target audiences, but the true audiences for these programs are much more limited. In 2007, only 11 percent of American adults looked for a new primary care physician, 28 percent needed a new specialist physician and 16 percent underwent a medical procedure at a new facility, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). Among consumers who found a new provider, few engaged in active shopping or considered price or quality information--especially when choosing specialists or facilities for medical procedures. When selecting new primary care physicians, half of all consumers relied on word-of-mouth recommendations from friends and relatives, but many also used doctor recommendations (38%) and health plan information (35%), and nearly two in five used multiple information sources when choosing a primary care physician. However, when choosing specialists and facilities for medical procedures, most consumers relied exclusively on physician referrals. Use of online provider information was low, ranging from 3 percent for consumers undergoing procedures to 7 percent for consumers choosing new specialists to 11 percent for consumers choosing new primary care physicians

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口口相传和医生推荐仍然推动着医疗保健提供者的选择。
医疗保健价格和质量透明度倡议的发起者通常将所有消费者视为其目标受众,但这些计划的真正受众要有限得多。根据卫生系统改革研究中心(HSC)的一项新的全国性研究,2007年,只有11%的美国成年人在寻找新的初级保健医生,28%的人需要新的专科医生,16%的人在新的医疗机构接受了医疗程序。在找到新供应商的消费者中,很少有人会主动购物或考虑价格或质量信息——尤其是在选择专家或医疗程序设施时。在选择新的初级保健医生时,一半的消费者依赖于朋友和亲戚的口碑推荐,但许多人也使用医生推荐(38%)和健康计划信息(35%),近五分之二的消费者在选择初级保健医生时使用多种信息来源。然而,在为医疗程序选择专家和设施时,大多数消费者完全依赖医生推荐。在线提供者信息的使用率很低,从接受手术的消费者占3%,到选择新的专家的消费者占7%,再到选择新的初级保健医生的消费者占11%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
If the price is right, most uninsured--even young invincibles--likely to consider new health insurance marketplaces. High and varying prices for privately insured patients underscore hospital market power. The surge in urgent care centers: emergency department alternative or costly convenience? Emergency preparedness and community coalitions: opportunities and challenges. Local public hospitals: changing with the times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1