Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Trends in Amplification Pub Date : 2009-03-01 Epub Date: 2008-12-11 DOI:10.1177/1084713808325412
Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida, Patrick M Zurek
{"title":"Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.","authors":"Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida, Patrick M Zurek","doi":"10.1177/1084713808325412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A critical review of studies of temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment is presented with the aim of assessing evidence for suprathreshold deficits. Particular attention is paid to the roles of variables-such as stimulus audibility, overall stimulus level, and participant's age-which may complicate the interpretation of experimental findings in comparing the performance of hearing-impaired (HI) and normal-hearing (NH) listeners. On certain temporal tasks (e.g., gap detection), the performance of HI listeners appears to be degraded relative to that of NH listeners when compared at equal SPL (sound pressure level). For other temporal tasks (e.g., forward masking), HI performance is degraded relative to that of NH listeners when compared at equal sensation level. A relatively small group of studies exists, however, in which the effects of stimulus audibility and level (and occasionally participant's age) have been controlled through the use of noise-masked simulation of hearing loss in NH listeners. For some temporal tasks (including gap-detection, gap-duration discrimination, and detection of brief tones in modulated noise), the performance of HI listeners is well reproduced in the results of noise-masked NH listeners. For other tasks (i.e., temporal integration), noise-masked hearing-loss simulations do not reproduce the results of HI listeners. In three additional areas of temporal processing (duration discrimination, detection of temporal modulation in noise, and various temporal-masking paradigms), further studies employing control of stimulus audibility and level, as well as age, are necessary for a more complete understanding of the role of suprathreshold deficits in the temporal-processing abilities of HI listeners.</p>","PeriodicalId":48972,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Amplification","volume":"13 1","pages":"4-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2880464/pdf/10.1177_1084713808325412.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Amplification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713808325412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A critical review of studies of temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment is presented with the aim of assessing evidence for suprathreshold deficits. Particular attention is paid to the roles of variables-such as stimulus audibility, overall stimulus level, and participant's age-which may complicate the interpretation of experimental findings in comparing the performance of hearing-impaired (HI) and normal-hearing (NH) listeners. On certain temporal tasks (e.g., gap detection), the performance of HI listeners appears to be degraded relative to that of NH listeners when compared at equal SPL (sound pressure level). For other temporal tasks (e.g., forward masking), HI performance is degraded relative to that of NH listeners when compared at equal sensation level. A relatively small group of studies exists, however, in which the effects of stimulus audibility and level (and occasionally participant's age) have been controlled through the use of noise-masked simulation of hearing loss in NH listeners. For some temporal tasks (including gap-detection, gap-duration discrimination, and detection of brief tones in modulated noise), the performance of HI listeners is well reproduced in the results of noise-masked NH listeners. For other tasks (i.e., temporal integration), noise-masked hearing-loss simulations do not reproduce the results of HI listeners. In three additional areas of temporal processing (duration discrimination, detection of temporal modulation in noise, and various temporal-masking paradigms), further studies employing control of stimulus audibility and level, as well as age, are necessary for a more complete understanding of the role of suprathreshold deficits in the temporal-processing abilities of HI listeners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评论文章:关于人工耳蜗听力障碍听者时间分辨率的文献综述:对阈上缺陷作用的批判性评估。
本研究对人工耳蜗听力障碍听者的时间分辨率研究进行了批判性回顾,旨在评估阈上缺陷的证据。在比较听力受损(HI)和听力正常(NH)听者的表现时,特别关注了变量的作用,如刺激的可听度、总体刺激水平和参与者的年龄,这些变量可能会使实验结果的解释复杂化。在某些时间任务(如间隙检测)上,在相同 SPL(声压级)的情况下,听力受损者的表现似乎比听力正常者的表现要差。对于其他时间任务(如前向掩蔽),在感觉水平相同的情况下,HI 听者的表现相对于 NH 听者会有所下降。然而,有一小部分研究通过使用噪声掩蔽模拟 NH 听者的听力损失,控制了刺激的可听度和水平(有时还包括参与者的年龄)的影响。在某些时间任务中(包括间隙检测、间隙持续时间辨别和在调制噪声中检测短暂音调),HI 听者的表现在噪声掩蔽的 NH 听者的结果中得到了很好的再现。而在其他任务(如时间整合)中,噪声掩蔽听力损失模拟不能再现 HI 听者的结果。在时间处理的另外三个方面(持续时间辨别、噪声中的时间调制检测和各种时间掩蔽范例),有必要通过控制刺激的可听度和水平以及年龄进行进一步研究,以便更全面地了解阈上缺陷在 HI 听力者时间处理能力中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Amplification
Trends in Amplification AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS. The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation. The master hearing aid. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1