{"title":"[Daily clinical practice: Biological testing in osteoporosis].","authors":"Jean-Claude Souberbielle, Catherine Cormier","doi":"10.1051/jbio:2008031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although biological testing has nothing to do with the diagnosis of osteoporosis, it can help the physician to: 1) identify secondary causes of low bone mass and/or fracture. There is however currently no consensus to define the biochemical parameters to be measured in this case. The cost-effectiveness of the biological evaluation, that is, measuring a minimum of parameters to detect a maximum of anomalies needs to be considered. Most experts agree that malignancy and especially a myeloma should be ruled out, and that an evaluation of calcium/phosphorus metabolism including the measurement of serum calcium, phosphate, PTH and 25 hydroxy-vitamin D should be performed. This allows to detect many anomalies including two very frequent conditions, primary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency. Note however that complementary testing is generally needed to identify other diseases; 2) evaluate efficacy and observance of some osteoporosis treatments especially oral bisphosphonates. In this case, the evolution of the blood or urine level of some markers of bone turnover over a 3-6 month period after the initiation of therapy will be considered. For example, a decrease of more than 30% in the serum concentration of CTX (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen) will be regarded as a significant change indicating that treatment has reduced bone resorption.</p>","PeriodicalId":80018,"journal":{"name":"Journal de la Societe de biologie","volume":"202 4","pages":"275-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/jbio:2008031","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de la Societe de biologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio:2008031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Although biological testing has nothing to do with the diagnosis of osteoporosis, it can help the physician to: 1) identify secondary causes of low bone mass and/or fracture. There is however currently no consensus to define the biochemical parameters to be measured in this case. The cost-effectiveness of the biological evaluation, that is, measuring a minimum of parameters to detect a maximum of anomalies needs to be considered. Most experts agree that malignancy and especially a myeloma should be ruled out, and that an evaluation of calcium/phosphorus metabolism including the measurement of serum calcium, phosphate, PTH and 25 hydroxy-vitamin D should be performed. This allows to detect many anomalies including two very frequent conditions, primary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency. Note however that complementary testing is generally needed to identify other diseases; 2) evaluate efficacy and observance of some osteoporosis treatments especially oral bisphosphonates. In this case, the evolution of the blood or urine level of some markers of bone turnover over a 3-6 month period after the initiation of therapy will be considered. For example, a decrease of more than 30% in the serum concentration of CTX (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen) will be regarded as a significant change indicating that treatment has reduced bone resorption.