Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Mohammad Shamim Hossein, Yeon Woo Jeong, Sun Woo Park, Joung Joo Kim, Eugine Lee, Kyeong Hee Ko, Huen Suk Kim, Yeun Wook Kim, Sang Hwan Hyun, Taeyoung Shin, Lou Hawthorne, Woo Suk Hwang
{"title":"Cloning missy: obtaining multiple offspring of a specific canine genotype by somatic cell nuclear transfer.","authors":"Mohammad Shamim Hossein,&nbsp;Yeon Woo Jeong,&nbsp;Sun Woo Park,&nbsp;Joung Joo Kim,&nbsp;Eugine Lee,&nbsp;Kyeong Hee Ko,&nbsp;Huen Suk Kim,&nbsp;Yeun Wook Kim,&nbsp;Sang Hwan Hyun,&nbsp;Taeyoung Shin,&nbsp;Lou Hawthorne,&nbsp;Woo Suk Hwang","doi":"10.1089/clo.2008.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.</p>","PeriodicalId":49217,"journal":{"name":"Cloning Stem Cells","volume":"11 1","pages":"123-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/clo.2008.0029","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cloning Stem Cells","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2008.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to evaluate two activation methods for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), namely, fusion and simultaneous activation (FSA, fusion medium contains calcium), versus fusion followed by chemical activation (F+CA, fusion medium does not contain calcium), and to evaluate the effects of parity of recipient dogs on the success of SCNT. Oocytes retrieved from outbred dogs were reconstructed with adult somatic cells collected from an 11-year-old female dog named Missy. In the FSA method, oocytes were fused and activated at the same time using two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec. In the F+CA method, oocytes were fused with two DC pulses of 1.75 kV/cm for 15 microsec, and then activated 1 h after fusion by 10 microM calcium ionophore for 4 m and cultured for 4 h in 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for postactivation. Activation method had a significant impact on the production efficiency of cloned dogs. There was a significant difference in full-term pregnancy rate and percentage of live puppies between the two methods (6.3% and 38.5% for FSA and F+CA, respectively). In our study, four out of five live offspring produced by F+CA survived versus FSA, which did not result in any surviving puppies. Overall, as few as 14 dogs and 54 reconstructed embryos were needed to produce a cloned puppy. In addition, the parity of recipient bitches had no effect on the success of SCNT in canine species. Both the nullipara and multipara bitches produced live puppies following SCNT-ET.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克隆missy:通过体细胞核移植获得特定犬基因型的多个后代。
本研究评估了体细胞核移植(SCNT)的两种激活方法,即融合和同时激活(FSA,融合介质含钙)与融合后化学激活(F+CA,融合介质不含钙),并评估了受体犬的胎次对SCNT成功的影响。从近交犬中提取的卵母细胞与从一只名叫Missy的11岁雌性犬身上收集的成年体细胞进行了重建。在FSA方法中,使用两个1.75 kV/cm的直流脉冲,同时融合和激活卵母细胞,持续15微秒。在F+CA法中,卵母细胞用两个1.75 kV/cm的直流脉冲融合15微秒,融合1 h后用10微米的钙离子载体活化4 m,在1.9 mM的6-二甲氨基嘌呤中培养4 h后活化。激活方法对克隆犬的生产效率有显著影响。两种方法的足月妊娠率和活仔率差异有统计学意义(分别为6.3%和38.5%)。在我们的研究中,与FSA相比,F+CA产生的5只活的后代中有4只存活了下来,而FSA没有产生任何存活的幼犬。总的来说,克隆小狗只需要14只狗和54个重建胚胎。此外,受体母狗的胎次对犬种SCNT的成功没有影响。在SCNT-ET后,未生育和多生育的母狗都能产下活的幼犬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
The Magical World of Cells The Mixed Enthusiasm for Animal Cloning BACK MATTER Cell Operations for Creating New Individuals Ascendant Cell Transplantation Therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1