Endurance and strength training have different benefits for people with peripheral arterial disease, but both improve quality of life

Sandeep Gupta
{"title":"Endurance and strength training have different benefits for people with peripheral arterial disease, but both improve quality of life","authors":"Sandeep Gupta","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70064-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Do treadmill training and resistance training improve the functional performance of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD)?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised, controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment and stratification for symptoms of intermittent claudication (IC).</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Tertiary hospital in the USA.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Participants with an ankle brachial index of 0.95 or less were recruited from vascular clinics and the community. Key exclusion criteria were critical limb ischaemia, foot ulcers, amputation, inability to attend or perform the interventions, and usual exercise comparable to the study regimens. Randomisation of 156 participants allotted 51 to treadmill training, 52 to resistance training and 53 to a control group.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The treadmill group performed supervised treadmill exercise 3 times per week for 6 months. Participants aimed to increase to 40 minutes by week 8, after which the speed or grade of the treadmill was progressed. Participants with IC were encouraged to exercise to near maximal leg symptoms. Asymptomatic participants exercised at a perceived exertion of 12 to 14 on the Borg scale. The resistance group also performed supervised exercise 3 times per week for 6 months, including 3 sets of 8 repetitions of resisted lower limb exercises. External resistance was maintained above 50% of 1 repetition maximum and perceived exertion at 12 to 14. The control group attended 11 sessions that were designed to provide contact with a health professional but not to change behaviour.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes were the change in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and the short physical performance battery (SPPB) at 6 months. The SPPB assesses walking speed, balance, and sit-to-stand performance. Secondary outcome measures were treadmill endurance, lower limb strength, endothelial function measured non-invasively at the brachial artery, habitual physical activity measured over 7 days via an accelerometer, a walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ), and the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to control, treadmill training significantly improved 6MW distance (by 36 m, 95% CI 15 to 57), total treadmill time (by 3.4 min, 95% CI 2 to 4.8), pain-free treadmill time (by 1.6 min, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.9), endothelial function, and the Distance domain of the WIQ. Compared to control, resistance training significantly improved total treadmill time (by 1.9 min, 95% CI 0.5 to 3.3), knee extension strength (by 80 N, 95% CI 37 to 124), and the Distance and Stair Climbing domains of the WIQ. Both regimens produced significant, 7.5-point improvements in the Physical Functioning domain of the SF-36.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Treadmill and resistance training have different benefits for people with peripheral arterial disease, but both improve quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"Page 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70064-9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Question

Do treadmill training and resistance training improve the functional performance of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD)?

Design

Randomised, controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment and stratification for symptoms of intermittent claudication (IC).

Setting

Tertiary hospital in the USA.

Participants

Participants with an ankle brachial index of 0.95 or less were recruited from vascular clinics and the community. Key exclusion criteria were critical limb ischaemia, foot ulcers, amputation, inability to attend or perform the interventions, and usual exercise comparable to the study regimens. Randomisation of 156 participants allotted 51 to treadmill training, 52 to resistance training and 53 to a control group.

Interventions

The treadmill group performed supervised treadmill exercise 3 times per week for 6 months. Participants aimed to increase to 40 minutes by week 8, after which the speed or grade of the treadmill was progressed. Participants with IC were encouraged to exercise to near maximal leg symptoms. Asymptomatic participants exercised at a perceived exertion of 12 to 14 on the Borg scale. The resistance group also performed supervised exercise 3 times per week for 6 months, including 3 sets of 8 repetitions of resisted lower limb exercises. External resistance was maintained above 50% of 1 repetition maximum and perceived exertion at 12 to 14. The control group attended 11 sessions that were designed to provide contact with a health professional but not to change behaviour.

Outcome measures

The primary outcomes were the change in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and the short physical performance battery (SPPB) at 6 months. The SPPB assesses walking speed, balance, and sit-to-stand performance. Secondary outcome measures were treadmill endurance, lower limb strength, endothelial function measured non-invasively at the brachial artery, habitual physical activity measured over 7 days via an accelerometer, a walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ), and the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire.

Results

Compared to control, treadmill training significantly improved 6MW distance (by 36 m, 95% CI 15 to 57), total treadmill time (by 3.4 min, 95% CI 2 to 4.8), pain-free treadmill time (by 1.6 min, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.9), endothelial function, and the Distance domain of the WIQ. Compared to control, resistance training significantly improved total treadmill time (by 1.9 min, 95% CI 0.5 to 3.3), knee extension strength (by 80 N, 95% CI 37 to 124), and the Distance and Stair Climbing domains of the WIQ. Both regimens produced significant, 7.5-point improvements in the Physical Functioning domain of the SF-36.

Conclusion

Treadmill and resistance training have different benefits for people with peripheral arterial disease, but both improve quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐力和力量训练对外周动脉疾病患者有不同的好处,但都能提高生活质量
跑步机训练和阻力训练能改善外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的功能表现吗?随机对照试验,对间歇性跛行(IC)症状进行盲法结局评估和分层。美国三级医院。踝关节肱指数为0.95或更低的参与者从血管诊所和社区招募。主要排除标准为严重肢体缺血、足部溃疡、截肢、无法参加或执行干预措施以及与研究方案相当的日常运动。156名参与者随机分配,51人进行跑步机训练,52人进行阻力训练,53人作为对照组。干预措施:跑步机组每周进行3次有监督的跑步机锻炼,持续6个月。参与者的目标是在第8周增加到40分钟,之后增加跑步机的速度或等级。IC患者被鼓励进行接近最大腿部症状的运动。无症状的参与者在博格量表上的感知运动为12到14。抵抗组每周进行3次有监督的运动,持续6个月,包括3组8次重复的下肢抵抗运动。外部阻力维持在1次重复最大值的50%以上,并在12至14时感觉到劳累。对照组参加了11次会议,旨在提供与健康专业人员的联系,但不改变行为。主要结果是6个月时6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和短物理性能电池(SPPB)的变化。SPPB评估行走速度、平衡和坐立表现。次要结果测量是跑步机耐力、下肢力量、无创肱动脉内皮功能测量、7天内通过加速度计测量的习惯性身体活动、行走障碍问卷(WIQ)和SF-36生活质量问卷。结果与对照组相比,跑步机训练显著改善了6MW距离(36 m, 95% CI 15 ~ 57)、总跑步时间(3.4 min, 95% CI 2 ~ 4.8)、无痛跑步时间(1.6 min, 95% CI 0.3 ~ 2.9)、内皮功能和WIQ的距离域。与对照组相比,阻力训练显著改善了跑步机总时间(1.9分钟,95% CI 0.5至3.3),膝关节伸展强度(80 N, 95% CI 37至124),以及WIQ的距离和爬楼梯范围。两种方案在SF-36的生理功能领域都产生了显著的7.5分的改善。结论跑步机和阻力训练对外周动脉疾病患者的疗效不同,但均能提高患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum Erratum Telerehabilitation: a coming of age Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome have weak hip muscles: a systematic review Passive mobilisation of shoulder region joints plus advice and exercise does not reduce pain and disability more than advice and exercise alone: a randomised trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1