[Therapeutic choices and prognosis related to teeth or implants].

Revue belge de medecine dentaire Pub Date : 2008-01-01
Hugo De Bruyn, Roeland De Moor
{"title":"[Therapeutic choices and prognosis related to teeth or implants].","authors":"Hugo De Bruyn,&nbsp;Roeland De Moor","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preservation of natural teeth is the ultimate goal of dentistry today. Regular screening for periodontal disease, followed by infection control whenever necessary, positively affects tooth preservation, the more when the patients complies with therapy and regular maintenance. The dentist is, however, often confronted with treatment dilemmas and has to decide whether to extract or preserve teeth, to extirpate or extract, to keep or to implant, to make removable or fixed prostheses. Decision making is depending on the prognosis of teeth and becomes more difficult when teeth are supporting prosthetic restorations because the question arises: \"How long will the teeth and the restoration survive?\". Systematic reviews have revealed that teeth and implants have a similar prognosis. They are prone to biological and technical complications, the latter determining long term prognosis. Implant survival rates are around 93% after 10 years but the survival of the construction ranges between 80% and 90% depending on the type and extension. Complications are reported in the order of 35%. Prosthetic restoration on natural teeth have a 10-year survival of 80-90% with 34% of complications. The present paper gives a brief overview of the prognosis of dental treatments and discusses arguments that may be of help to make treatment decision choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":77359,"journal":{"name":"Revue belge de medecine dentaire","volume":"63 4","pages":"154-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue belge de medecine dentaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preservation of natural teeth is the ultimate goal of dentistry today. Regular screening for periodontal disease, followed by infection control whenever necessary, positively affects tooth preservation, the more when the patients complies with therapy and regular maintenance. The dentist is, however, often confronted with treatment dilemmas and has to decide whether to extract or preserve teeth, to extirpate or extract, to keep or to implant, to make removable or fixed prostheses. Decision making is depending on the prognosis of teeth and becomes more difficult when teeth are supporting prosthetic restorations because the question arises: "How long will the teeth and the restoration survive?". Systematic reviews have revealed that teeth and implants have a similar prognosis. They are prone to biological and technical complications, the latter determining long term prognosis. Implant survival rates are around 93% after 10 years but the survival of the construction ranges between 80% and 90% depending on the type and extension. Complications are reported in the order of 35%. Prosthetic restoration on natural teeth have a 10-year survival of 80-90% with 34% of complications. The present paper gives a brief overview of the prognosis of dental treatments and discusses arguments that may be of help to make treatment decision choices.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[与牙齿或种植体相关的治疗选择和预后]。
保存天然牙齿是当今牙科的最终目标。定期进行牙周病筛查,并在必要时进行感染控制,对牙齿保存有积极影响,如果患者遵守治疗和定期保养,效果越好。然而,牙医经常面临治疗难题,必须决定是拔牙还是保留牙齿,是拔牙还是拔牙,是保留还是种植,是制作可移动的还是固定的假体。决策取决于牙齿的预后,当牙齿支持假体修复时,决策变得更加困难,因为问题出现了:“牙齿和修复体能存活多久?”系统回顾显示,牙齿和种植体具有相似的预后。他们容易出现生物和技术并发症,后者决定长期预后。种植体10年后的存活率约为93%,但根据种植体的类型和延伸,种植体的存活率在80%到90%之间。并发症的发生率约为35%。天然牙义齿修复10年生存率为80-90%,并发症发生率为34%。本文简要概述了牙科治疗的预后,并讨论了可能有助于做出治疗决策的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Value(s)]. Esthetic Dentistry [Occupational diseases in sugar workers. Results of an enquiry. 1926]. [The Industrial Accidents act (1903) and the birth of the Industrial Accidents Fund (1967)]. [Revision of the guidelines for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders approved by the "Council of the AADR" 3 March 2010].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1