Fungal pathogen (mis-) identifications: A case study with DNA barcodes on Melampsora rusts of aspen and white poplar

Nicolas Feau , Agathe Vialle , Mathieu Allaire , Philippe Tanguay , David L. Joly , Pascal Frey , Brenda E. Callan , Richard C. Hamelin
{"title":"Fungal pathogen (mis-) identifications: A case study with DNA barcodes on Melampsora rusts of aspen and white poplar","authors":"Nicolas Feau ,&nbsp;Agathe Vialle ,&nbsp;Mathieu Allaire ,&nbsp;Philippe Tanguay ,&nbsp;David L. Joly ,&nbsp;Pascal Frey ,&nbsp;Brenda E. Callan ,&nbsp;Richard C. Hamelin","doi":"10.1016/j.mycres.2009.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wide variation and overlap in morphological characters have led to confusion in species identification within the fungal rust genus <em>Melampsora</em>. The <em>Melampsora</em> species with uredinial–telial stages on white poplar and aspens are especially prone to misidentification. This group includes the <em>Melampsora populnea</em> species complex and the highly destructive pine twisting rust, <em>Melampsora pinitorqua</em>, which alternates between hosts in <em>Populus</em> section <em>Populus</em> and <em>Pinus</em>. Our objective was to compare morphologically based identification to genetic material extracted from <em>Melampsora</em> species pathogenic to aspen and white poplar. We compared morphometric traits and DNA barcodes obtained from internal transcribed spacer (<em>ITS</em>), large ribosomal RNA subunit (<em>28S</em>), and mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (<em>CO1</em>) sequences to delimit within this taxonomically difficult group. Eight different <em>Melampsora</em> species were initially defined based on host specificity and morphometric data. DNA barcodes were then overlaid on these initial species definitions. The DNA barcodes, specifically those defined on <em>ITS</em> and <em>28S</em> sequences, provided a highly accurate means of identifying and resolving <em>Melampsora</em> taxa. We highlighted species misidentification in specimens from Canadian herbaria related to either <em>Melampsora medusae</em> f. sp. <em>tremuloidae</em> or <em>Melampsora aecidioides</em>. Finally, we evidenced that the north-American species found on <em>Populus alba</em>, <em>M. aecidioides</em> is closely related but distinct from the four species of the <em>M. populnea</em> complex (<em>Melampsora larici-tremulae</em>, <em>Melampsora magnusiana</em>, <em>Melampsora pinitorqua</em>, and <em>Melampsora rostrupii</em>) found in Eurasia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19045,"journal":{"name":"Mycological research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mycres.2009.02.007","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953756209000495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Wide variation and overlap in morphological characters have led to confusion in species identification within the fungal rust genus Melampsora. The Melampsora species with uredinial–telial stages on white poplar and aspens are especially prone to misidentification. This group includes the Melampsora populnea species complex and the highly destructive pine twisting rust, Melampsora pinitorqua, which alternates between hosts in Populus section Populus and Pinus. Our objective was to compare morphologically based identification to genetic material extracted from Melampsora species pathogenic to aspen and white poplar. We compared morphometric traits and DNA barcodes obtained from internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large ribosomal RNA subunit (28S), and mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) sequences to delimit within this taxonomically difficult group. Eight different Melampsora species were initially defined based on host specificity and morphometric data. DNA barcodes were then overlaid on these initial species definitions. The DNA barcodes, specifically those defined on ITS and 28S sequences, provided a highly accurate means of identifying and resolving Melampsora taxa. We highlighted species misidentification in specimens from Canadian herbaria related to either Melampsora medusae f. sp. tremuloidae or Melampsora aecidioides. Finally, we evidenced that the north-American species found on Populus alba, M. aecidioides is closely related but distinct from the four species of the M. populnea complex (Melampsora larici-tremulae, Melampsora magnusiana, Melampsora pinitorqua, and Melampsora rostrupii) found in Eurasia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真菌病原体(错误)鉴定:以白杨和白杨黑腐菌的DNA条形码为例
真菌锈属(Melampsora)在形态特征上的广泛变异和重叠导致了物种鉴定的混乱。在白杨和白杨上具有尿道-端部阶段的Melampsora种特别容易被误认。这一类群包括Melampsora populnea物种复合体和极具破坏性的松树扭曲锈病Melampsora pinitorqua,它在杨科(Populus)和松科(Pinus)中交替发生。我们的目的是比较从致病性杨树和白杨的黑僵菌中提取的遗传物质的形态学鉴定。我们比较了形态学特征和从内部转录间隔段(ITS)、大核糖体RNA亚基(28S)和线粒体细胞色素氧化酶1 (CO1)序列中获得的DNA条形码,以确定这一分类困难的群体。根据宿主特异性和形态计量学数据,初步定义了8种不同的黑虫。DNA条形码随后被覆盖在这些最初的物种定义上。DNA条形码,特别是在ITS和28S序列上定义的DNA条形码,提供了一种高度准确的识别和分类方法。我们强调了在加拿大植物标本馆的标本中,与银耳虫科Melampsora medusae f.p . tremuloidae或aeciides有关的物种错误鉴定。最后,我们证明了在白杨上发现的北美种,M. aecidiides与在欧亚大陆发现的4种M. populnea复合体(Melampsora laricii -tremulae, Melampsora magnusiana, Melampsora pinitorqua和rostrupii)有密切的亲缘关系,但不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Identification of heavy metal regulated genes from the root associated ascomycete Cadophora finlandica using a genomic microarray Molecular and ultrastructural characterization of two ascomycetes found on sunken wood off Vanuatu Islands in the deep Pacific Ocean Trichoderma species form endophytic associations within Theobroma cacao trichomes A beauvericin hot spot in the genus Isaria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1