Characterization of the location and extent of myocardial infarction using heart vector analysis.

Ali Ghaffari, Mohammad Atarod, Masood Ghasemi
{"title":"Characterization of the location and extent of myocardial infarction using heart vector analysis.","authors":"Ali Ghaffari,&nbsp;Mohammad Atarod,&nbsp;Masood Ghasemi","doi":"10.1007/s10558-009-9065-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An innovative method was proposed on the basis of vectorcardiography to characterize the location and extent of moderate to large, relatively compact infarcts using ECG evidence. It is assumed that heart vector is proportional to relevant active depolarization area(s). The normal VCG was then used to examine our ideas based on the information of location, amplitude, and direction of heart vector at any instant that is included in it. The model-based comparison of cases under study and relevant normal VCGs gives region and extent of myocardial infarction. Three criteria were finally defined to evaluate the presented method based on Physionet database. EPD, which is the percentage discrepancy between the extent of the infarct as estimated from our proposed method and as determined from the gold standard. SO, which was defined as the overlap between the sets of infarct segments as estimated and as determined from the gold standard. And CED, which is the distance between the centroid (geometrical center) of the infarct as estimated from our method and as determined from the gold standard. Finally, we gained the values of EPD equal to 32, SO equal to 0.933 and CED equal to 1. The presented method is not applicable in cases of hypertrophy, Bundle Branch Block (BBB) and arrhythmia which can be a plan for future work.</p>","PeriodicalId":55275,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":"9 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-009-9065-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-009-9065-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An innovative method was proposed on the basis of vectorcardiography to characterize the location and extent of moderate to large, relatively compact infarcts using ECG evidence. It is assumed that heart vector is proportional to relevant active depolarization area(s). The normal VCG was then used to examine our ideas based on the information of location, amplitude, and direction of heart vector at any instant that is included in it. The model-based comparison of cases under study and relevant normal VCGs gives region and extent of myocardial infarction. Three criteria were finally defined to evaluate the presented method based on Physionet database. EPD, which is the percentage discrepancy between the extent of the infarct as estimated from our proposed method and as determined from the gold standard. SO, which was defined as the overlap between the sets of infarct segments as estimated and as determined from the gold standard. And CED, which is the distance between the centroid (geometrical center) of the infarct as estimated from our method and as determined from the gold standard. Finally, we gained the values of EPD equal to 32, SO equal to 0.933 and CED equal to 1. The presented method is not applicable in cases of hypertrophy, Bundle Branch Block (BBB) and arrhythmia which can be a plan for future work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用心脏矢量分析表征心肌梗死的位置和范围。
在矢量心动图的基础上提出了一种创新的方法,利用心电图证据来表征中度到大面积、相对致密性梗死的位置和范围。假设心脏矢量与相关的主动去极化面积成正比。然后使用正常的VCG来检查我们的想法,基于心脏矢量在任何时刻的位置,振幅和方向的信息。将研究病例与相关正常vcg进行模型比较,给出心肌梗死的区域和范围。最后定义了基于Physionet数据库的三个评价标准。EPD,即根据我们提出的方法估计的梗死范围与根据金标准确定的梗死范围之间的百分比差异。SO,定义为根据金标准估计和确定的梗死段组之间的重叠。CED是梗死的质心(几何中心)之间的距离根据我们的方法估计,根据金标准确定。最终得到EPD = 32, SO = 0.933, CED = 1。该方法不适用于肥厚、束支阻滞(BBB)和心律失常,可作为今后工作的规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Bioprinting of a Tissue Engineered Human Heart Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 2: From Fabrication to Optimization Square Root Design for Natural Frequency Module of Dynamic ECG Features—a Preliminary Study Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 1: From Conception to Materials Selection Biopolymers as Potential Carrier for Effervescent Reaction Based Drug Delivery System in Gastrointestinal Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1