Factors influencing cataract formation after Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy.

James C Bobrow
{"title":"Factors influencing cataract formation after Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy.","authors":"James C Bobrow","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The benign nature of Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) has recently been questioned because of increased cataract formation and other complications. This retrospective study includes 522 consecutive eyes of 275 individuals (group 1) on whom LPI was performed between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, for which at least 5 years of complete follow-up was available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were all operated on by a single surgeon using a Zeiss Meditec Nd:YAG laser for all procedures. Total energy delivered, degree of cataract at time of LPI and at last visit, interval to cataract surgery if needed, intraocular pressure (IOP), use of ocular and systemic medications, and associated medical and ocular conditions were recorded. One hundred-fifty eyes of 75 individuals without evidence of glaucoma were used for comparison of outcomes (group 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1A consisted of 146 eyes (27.9%) that underwent cataract surgery 5.9 (95% CI, 5.6-6.3) years after LPI. The remaining 376 eyes composed group 1B. Groups 1A and 1B differed significantly in patient age, grade of cataract at time of LPI, and length of follow-up. Groups 1 and 2 differed significantly in patient age and frequency of use of topical medication to control IOP, but not in frequency of cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LPI does not increase the incidence of cataract surgery, and cataract surgery should not be used as primary therapy for angle-closure glaucoma. Patients who have LPI are at greater risk of requiring therapy to control IOP, even if they have a successful procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23166,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2646425/pdf/1545-6110_v106_p093.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The benign nature of Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) has recently been questioned because of increased cataract formation and other complications. This retrospective study includes 522 consecutive eyes of 275 individuals (group 1) on whom LPI was performed between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, for which at least 5 years of complete follow-up was available.

Methods: Patients were all operated on by a single surgeon using a Zeiss Meditec Nd:YAG laser for all procedures. Total energy delivered, degree of cataract at time of LPI and at last visit, interval to cataract surgery if needed, intraocular pressure (IOP), use of ocular and systemic medications, and associated medical and ocular conditions were recorded. One hundred-fifty eyes of 75 individuals without evidence of glaucoma were used for comparison of outcomes (group 2).

Results: Group 1A consisted of 146 eyes (27.9%) that underwent cataract surgery 5.9 (95% CI, 5.6-6.3) years after LPI. The remaining 376 eyes composed group 1B. Groups 1A and 1B differed significantly in patient age, grade of cataract at time of LPI, and length of follow-up. Groups 1 and 2 differed significantly in patient age and frequency of use of topical medication to control IOP, but not in frequency of cataract surgery.

Conclusions: LPI does not increase the incidence of cataract surgery, and cataract surgery should not be used as primary therapy for angle-closure glaucoma. Patients who have LPI are at greater risk of requiring therapy to control IOP, even if they have a successful procedure.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nd:YAG激光周围虹膜切开术后白内障形成的影响因素。
目的:Nd:YAG激光外周虹膜切开术(LPI)的良性性质最近受到质疑,因为它增加了白内障的形成和其他并发症。本回顾性研究包括522只连续眼睛,275人(第一组),于1991年1月1日至2000年12月31日期间行LPI,至少有5年的完整随访。方法:所有患者均由一名外科医生使用蔡司Meditec Nd:YAG激光进行手术。记录总能量、LPI时和最后一次就诊时的白内障程度、需要白内障手术的间隔时间、眼压(IOP)、眼部和全身药物的使用以及相关的医疗和眼部状况。无青光眼证据的75例患者的150只眼睛用于比较结果(2组)。结果:1A组包括146只眼睛(27.9%),在LPI后5.9 (95% CI, 5.6-6.3)年接受白内障手术。剩下的376只眼睛组成1B组。1A组和1B组在患者年龄、LPI时白内障分级、随访时间等方面存在显著差异。组1和组2在患者年龄和使用局部药物控制IOP的频率上有显著差异,但在白内障手术的频率上无显著差异。结论:LPI不会增加白内障手术的发生率,白内障手术不应作为闭角型青光眼的主要治疗方法。LPI患者需要治疗控制IOP的风险更大,即使手术成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Utility of Color Duplex Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Masked Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Autoimmune Retinopathy: Current Concepts and Practices (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). The Relationship Between Ocular Itch, Ocular Pain, and Dry Eye Symptoms (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Erratum: Predictors of Intraocular Pressure After Phacoemulsification in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Eyes with Wide Versus Narrower Angles (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). The Effects of Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation on Anatomical and Functional Parameters in Patients with Primary Angle Closure: A Prospective Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1