Blink reflex recovery in central and peripherally originated movement disorders of the cranio-cervical area: a comparative study.

M Yaman, S Sahin, M Erdemir Kiziltan
{"title":"Blink reflex recovery in central and peripherally originated movement disorders of the cranio-cervical area: a comparative study.","authors":"M Yaman,&nbsp;S Sahin,&nbsp;M Erdemir Kiziltan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown that enhancement of blink reflex (BR) excitability exists in various movement disorders, notably those involving the cranio-cervical area. In this study the BR recovery curve of the late component (R2) and R2 area was evaluated to determine what changes occur under different conditions and the significance of these changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recovery curve of the blink reflex (BR) was studied in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS), post-facial syndrome (PFS), blepharospasm (BS), segmental cranio-cervical dystonia (SD), cervical dystonia without BS (CD), and healthy control subjects. Following initial comparisons between six groups where the increased excitability observed in BS, SD and CD were assumed to be of central origin and that of HFS and PFS of peripheral origin; two additional groups were established and compared in terms of recovery times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery values of 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 ms and grades for all groups were significantly different when compared to the control group. The most significant difference observed between the groups was at 200 msn and the smallest at 800 msn interstimuli intervals. The subjects within the group referred to as the 'central origined group' recovered faster than those in the 'peripherally origined group' although no statistical difference was found between the two groups at stimulus interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that the excitability changes observed among the groups can be attributed to a number of factors. Although the nature and anatomical substrate of the primary pathology involving the reflex cycle leads - to some extent - to differently enhanced excitability patterns, such differences were not considered statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 1","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that enhancement of blink reflex (BR) excitability exists in various movement disorders, notably those involving the cranio-cervical area. In this study the BR recovery curve of the late component (R2) and R2 area was evaluated to determine what changes occur under different conditions and the significance of these changes.

Methods: The recovery curve of the blink reflex (BR) was studied in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS), post-facial syndrome (PFS), blepharospasm (BS), segmental cranio-cervical dystonia (SD), cervical dystonia without BS (CD), and healthy control subjects. Following initial comparisons between six groups where the increased excitability observed in BS, SD and CD were assumed to be of central origin and that of HFS and PFS of peripheral origin; two additional groups were established and compared in terms of recovery times.

Results: Recovery values of 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 ms and grades for all groups were significantly different when compared to the control group. The most significant difference observed between the groups was at 200 msn and the smallest at 800 msn interstimuli intervals. The subjects within the group referred to as the 'central origined group' recovered faster than those in the 'peripherally origined group' although no statistical difference was found between the two groups at stimulus interval.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the excitability changes observed among the groups can be attributed to a number of factors. Although the nature and anatomical substrate of the primary pathology involving the reflex cycle leads - to some extent - to differently enhanced excitability patterns, such differences were not considered statistically significant.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中枢性和外周性颅颈区运动障碍的眨眼反射恢复:比较研究。
背景:以往的研究表明,眨眼反射(BR)兴奋性增强存在于各种运动障碍中,特别是涉及颅颈区的运动障碍。本研究对后期组分(R2)和R2面积的BR恢复曲线进行了评价,以确定在不同条件下发生了哪些变化,以及这些变化的意义。方法:研究面肌痉挛(HFS)、面后综合征(PFS)、眼睑痉挛(BS)、节段性颅颈肌张力障碍(SD)、无BS的颈肌张力障碍(CD)患者及健康对照的眨眼反射(BR)恢复曲线。在六组之间的初步比较中,假设BS, SD和CD的兴奋性增加是中心源性的,而HFS和PFS的兴奋性增加是外周源性的;另外建立两组,并在恢复时间方面进行比较。结果:与对照组相比,各组在200、400、600、800、1000 ms及等级的恢复值均有显著差异。两组间差异最大的是200 msn,最小的是800 msn。被称为“中心源组”的受试者比“外周源组”的受试者恢复得更快,尽管在刺激间隔内两组之间没有统计学差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,各组之间观察到的兴奋性变化可归因于许多因素。虽然涉及反射周期的主要病理的性质和解剖学基础在某种程度上导致了不同的兴奋性增强模式,但这种差异在统计学上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of gender on the EMG signal of the quadriceps femoris muscles and performance in high-intensity short-term exercise. Activity and asymmetry index of masticatory muscles in women with and without dysfunction temporomandibular. Scientific basis for learning transfer from movements to urinary bladder functions for bladder repair in human patients with CNS injury. Common peroneal and tibial nerve paralysis secondary to herpes zoster infection: a case report. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1